主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
Articles

Financing Decisions for Confirming Warehouse with Core Enterprise's Buyback Guarantee

Expand
  • Business School, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

Received date: 2015-12-10

  Revised date: 2016-03-31

  Online published: 2017-01-23

Abstract

Using core enterprise's credit for reference and confirming warehouse emerge as the times require to strengthen SMEs' credit condition make it easier for them to get financial support from banks. However, with the deterioration of market conditions, many SMEs go bankrupt and the core enterprise then undertake huge joint indemnity. In the supply chain, a bi-level Stackelberg game in which the bank acts as the leader, the manufacturer as the subleader, the retailor as the follower is formulated. Taking the retailer's bankruptcy probability into account, the manufacturer buys back a certain percentage of unsold products and retailer takes the acceptance draft as a settlement tool to finance products. By adopting backward induction method, the decision of the retailer's optimal order quantity, manufacturer's optimal buyback rate and the bank's optimal interest rate is analyzed. Through numerical examples, it is found that the increase of the buyback rate can encourage the retailer to order and improve the profit of the supply chain. However, the change of the buyback rate to the bank's profit is greatly influenced by the retailer's bankruptcy probability. Higher buyback rate can stimulate creditworthy retailer to order more, and thus increase the bank's profit. To the poor credit retailer, the increase of order quantity will make bank a greater probability to suffer from loss, with expected profit reducing at the same time. So, when adopting any form of buyback contract, special attention should be paid to the side effect of bringing manufacturer to assume partial risk of market fluctuation. When demand recession resulting in SMEs' failure to repay bank acceptance bills, core enterprise can not make a full compensation either. Before signing for confirming warehouse agreement, bank should focus on both SMEs and core enterprise's credit repayment ability, as well as strengthen fund supervision, to avoid misusing of credit. With more and more people are concerned about the supply chain finance, the risk it brings to the entire supply chain system should not be neglected.

Cite this article

WANG Zong-run, MA Zhen, ZHOU Yan-ju . Financing Decisions for Confirming Warehouse with Core Enterprise's Buyback Guarantee[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016 , 24(11) : 162 -169 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.11.019

References

[1] 钟远光, 周永务, 李柏勋,等.供应链融资模式下零售商的订货与定价研究[J]. 管理科学学报,2011, 14(6): 57-67.

[2] 王宗润, 田续燃, 陈晓红. 考虑隐性股权的应收账款融资模式下供应链金融博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015,25(9): 1-8.

[3] Yan Nina, Dai Hongyan, Sun Baowen. Optimal bi-level Stackelberg strategies for supply chain financing with both capital-constrained buyers and sellers[J]. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 2014, 30(6): 783-796.

[4] Dada M, Hu Qiaohai. Financing newsvendor inventory[J]. Operations Research Letters, 2008, 36(5): 569-573.

[5] Chen Xiangfeng, Wang Anyu. Trade credit contract with limited liability in the supply chain with budget constraints[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2012, 196(1): 153-165.

[6] 李毅学, 汪寿阳, 冯耕中.物流金融中季节性存货质押融资质押率决策[J]. 管理科学学报, 2011, 14(11):19-32.

[7] 熊熊, 马佳, 赵文杰, 等. 供应链金融模式下的信用风险评价[J]. 南开管理评论, 2009, 12(4): 92-98.

[8] Zhang Lang, Hu Haiqing, Zhang Dan. A credit risk assessment model based on SVM for small and medium enterprises in supply chain finance[J]. Financial Innovation, 2015, 1(1): 1-21.

[9] Pasternack B A. Optimal pricing and return policies for perishable commodities[J]. Marketing science, 2008, 27(1): 133-140.

[10] 刘家国, 吴冲. 基于报童模型的两级供应链回购契约协调研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2010, 18(4): 73-78.

[11] Wu Desheng. Coordination of competing supply chains with news-vendor and buyback contract[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013, 144(1): 1-13.

[12] 王玉洁. 供应链金融中保兑仓融资与运作决策[D]. 北京:北京交通大学, 2009.

[13] 吴泽莹. 基于供应链金融的保兑仓参与方策略与风险评价研究[D]. 重庆:重庆大学, 2014.

[14] Lee C H, Rhee B D. Trade credit for supply chain coordination[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 214(1): 136-146.

[15] 晏妮娜, 孙宝文. 考虑信用额度的仓单质押融资模式下供应链金融最优策略[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2011, 31(9): 1674-1679.

[16] 易雪辉, 周宗放. 基于供应链金融的银行贷款价值比研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2012, 20(1): 102-108.

[17] Raghavan N R S, Mishra V K. Short-term financing in a cash-constrained supply chain[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2011, 134(2): 407-412.

[18] van der Vliet K, Reindorp M J, Fransoo J C. The price of reverse factoring: Financing rates vs. payment delays[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2015, 242(3): 842-853.

[19] 孙喜梅, 赵国坤. 考虑供应链信用水平的存货质押率研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(7): 010.

[20] Jing Bing, Seidmann A. Finance sourcing in a supply chain[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2014, 58: 15-20.
Outlines

/