主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
Articles

A Network Perspective Measurement Method for Banking Systemic Risk

Expand
  • 1. School of Finance, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Dalian 116025, China;
    2. Center for Commodity Markets and Behavioral Decision Research, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Dalian 116025, China;
    3. Surry International Institute, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Dalian 116025, China

Received date: 2014-12-19

  Revised date: 2015-12-07

  Online published: 2016-05-24

Abstract

The interbank network is convenient for liquidity adjustment of the interbank market.But, the network configuration also increases risk contagion among the interbank market.However, the relationship between the network configuration and the systemic risk is a disputable issue in the research area.On one hand, the systemic risk is a typical small probability event which only happens in extreme circumstance.On the other hand, simulated interbank market network in the research area is different from real interbank market configuration.So building a realistic network model and researching the behavior of real network model in extreme circumstance are the key issues.Based on reality interbank network model, two evaluation parameters of the systemic risk: VaR and ES are presented in this paper.Firstly, Monte Carlo method is utilized to simulate the external impact of interbank system.Then, the systemic risk VaR and ES which can reflect the small probability characters of the systemic risk are estimated and the tail properties of interbank system loss are captured.Secondly, real bank parameters are utilized to calibrate three kinds of interbank network in simulation.Such a method ensures the reality and reliability of simulation results.Finally, three valuable conclusions are drawn: (1) External impact will trigger contagion.The interbank system loss will change from norm distribution to heavy tail distribution and then to bimodal distribution.(2) The contagion probability of high density interbank network is smaller than that of low density network, but the destruction is much higher.(3) The potential contagion will enlarge the systemic risk and default contagion effect will increase exponentially.A model which can evaluate the extent of the destruction of the systemic risk in extreme condition is presented.Furthermore, the simulation results comprehensively reveal the relationship between the network configuration and the systemic risk.

Cite this article

SUI Cong, TAN Zhao-lin, WANG Zong-yao . A Network Perspective Measurement Method for Banking Systemic Risk[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016 , 24(5) : 54 -64 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.05.007

References

[1] Iori G, Jafarey S, Padilla F.Systemic risk on the interbank market[J].Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2006, 61(4):525-542.

[2] Allen F, Gale D.Financial contagion[J].Journal of Political Economy, 2000, 108(1):1-33.

[3] Nier E, Yang Jing, Yorulmazer T, et al.Network models and financial stability[J].Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2007, 31(6):2033-2060.

[4] May R M, Arinaminpathy N.Systemic risk:The dynamics of model banking systems[J].Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2010, 7(46):823-838.

[5] Gai P, Kapadia S.Contagion in financial networks[J]. Proceedings:Macthematical,Physical and Engineering Sciences,2010,466(2120):2401-2423.

[6] 隋聪, 迟国泰, 王宗尧.网络结构与银行系统性风险[J].管理科学学报, 2014,17(4):57-70.

[7] Wells S.UK interbank exposures:Systemic risk implications[J].Financial Stability Review, 2002, 13(12):175-182.

[8] Lublóy Á.Domino effect in the Hungarian interbank market[J].Hungarian Economic Review, 2005, 52(4):377-401.

[9] Mistrulli P.E.Assessing financial contagion in the interbank market:Maximum entropy versus observed interbank lending patterns[J].Journal of Banking & Finance, 2011, 35(5):1114-1127.

[10] 黄聪, 贾彦东.金融网络视角下的宏观审慎管理——基于银行间支付结算数据的实证分析[J].金融研究, 2010(4):1-14.

[11] 马君潞, 范小云, 曹元涛.中国银行间市场双边传染的风险估测及其系统性特征分析[J].经济研究, 2007(1):68-78.

[12] 陈庭强, 何建敏.基于复杂网络的信用风险传染模型研究[J].中国管理科学, 2014, 22(11):1-10.

[13] 欧阳红兵, 刘晓东.中国金融机构的系统重要性及系统性风险传染机制分析——基于复杂网络的视角[J].中国管理科学, 2015, 23(10):30-37.

[14] Boss M, Elsinger H, Summer M, et al.Network topology of the interbank market[J].Quantitative Finance, 2004, 4(6):677-684.

[15] Soramäki K, Bech M L, Arnold J, et al.The topology of interbank payment flows[J].Physica A, 2007, 379(1):317-333.

[16] Becher C, Millard S, Soramäki K.The network topology of CHAPS Sterling[R].Working Paper UK:Bank of England, 2008.

[17] Krause A, Giansante S.Interbank lending and the spread of bank failures:A network model of systemic risk[J].Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2012, 83(3):583-608.

[18] Sheldon G, Maurer M.Interbank lending and systemic risk:an empirical analysis for Switzerland[J].Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics, 1998, 134(4):685-704.

[19] Eisenberg L, Noe T H.Systemic risk in financial systems[J].Management Science, 2001, 47(2):236-249.

[20] Barrat A, Barthelemy M, Pastor-Satorras R, et al.The architecture of complex weighted networks[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2004, 101(11):3747-3752.
Outlines

/