As far as financial supervision is considered, since the China Banking Regulatory Commission issued a policy to design financial products of commercial banks to generate revenue, the policy effect has been a stage of convergence. In this study, the operating process of banking financial products under the supervision environment is divided into two stages(innovative product design and innovative product market performance), and then two-stage DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) model is used to obtain the innovative efficiency of Chinese banking industry from 2004 to 2014. Results show that the innovative efficiency of banking products in the first stage and the market performance efficiency of financial products in the second stage basically showed a positive correlation. Also, there is a certain lag effect in the impact of financial supervision on the innovation of products from commercial banks. In addition, by calculating the improved input indexes of innovative efficiency over the years in the banking industry, it is found that the difference between the efficient year and the inefficient year. On this basis, some suggestions about the innovation supervision of banking products are offered from the perspective of regulators as well as the operating level of banks. Studies in the future can start with the angle of classification supervision to further investigate the different performance of innovative efficiency by comparing supervision policy of different types of banks made by the China Banking Regulatory Commission.
ZENG Wei, CHEN Shou, ZHOU Zhong-bao
. The Impact of Financial Supervision on Commercial Bank's Product Innovation-the Research Based on Two-stage DEA Model[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016
, 24(5)
: 1
-7
.
DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.05.001
[1] Chen Xiaogang, Skully M, Brown K. Banking efficiency in China:Application of DEA to pre-and post-deregulation eras:1993-2000[J]. China Economic Review, 2005, 16(3):229-45.
[2] Laurenceson J, Qin Fengming. Has minority foreign investment in China's banks improved their cost efficiency[J]. China & World Economy, 2008,16(3):57-74.
[3] Luo Dan, Yao Shujie.World financial crisis and the rise of Chinese commercia banks:An efficient analysis using DEA[J]. Applied Financial Economics, 2010, 20(19):15-30.
[4] Barth J R, Lin Chen, Ma Yue, et al. Do bank regulation, supervision and monitoring enhance or impede bank efficiency?[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2013, 37(8):2879-2892.
[5] Seiford L M, J Zhu. Profitability and marketability of the top 55 U.S. commercial banks[J]. Management Science,1999, 45(9):1270-1288.
[6] Wang Ke, Huang Wei, Wu Jie, et al. Efficiency measures of the Chinese commercial banking system using an additive two-stage DEA[J]. Omega, 2014, 44:5-20.
[7] Zha Yong, Liang Nannan, Wu Maoguo, et al. Efficiency evaluation of Banks in China:A dynamic two-stage slacks-based measure approach[J]. Omega, 2016, 60:60-72.
[8] 毕功兵,梁樑,杨锋.两阶段生产系统的DEA效率评价模型[J].中国管理科学, 2007, 15(2):92-96.
[9] 任祝景.两阶段DEA模型及其在商业银行经营效率中的应用[D].上海:上海交通大学, 2008.
[10] 周逢民,张会元,周海,孙佰清.基于两阶段关联DEA模型的我国商业银行效率评价[J].金融研究, 2010, (11):169-179.
[11] 王赫一,张屹山.两阶段DEA前沿面投影问题研究-兼对我国上市银行运营绩效进行评价[J]. 中国管理科学, 2012, 20(2):114-120.
[12] 刘德彬,马超群,周忠宝,等. 存在非期望输入输出的多阶段系统效率评价模型[J]. 中国管理科学,2015, 23(4):129-138.