Under the requirement of constructing multi-level capital market, it is the effective derivatives-spots hedging mechanism that contributes to the well-developed financial market in our country. The function of providing risk-hedging for investors under futures-spots system requests more than price and volatility synchronously between them, but at the microscopic level, that is, on the level of order liquidity. The investors such as arbitragers and hedgers under high-frequency circumstances build trading records of stock index future market and spot market together. And whether there is a an arbitrage opportunity, the order liquidity of these two types of assets will change earlier than prices. If in any circumstance, the convergence of order liquidity will be reflected in securities of these two categories, the abnormal basis risk can hardly occur. This makes a contribution to the establishment of healthy "walk-the-dog" effect between stock index and stock index futures. Based on high-frequency trading data of futures and spots, order liquidity has been constructed and an effective method has been provided to test whether there is "walking-the-dog" effect to keep close relation between futures and spots under order liquidity level in usual days. Theorem 1 provides the theoretical foundation of test method in this paper. Volume-clock method is used in high-frequency trading data and dominants to chronic-clock is depicted in this paper. In empirical study, using high-frequency trading data of SS300 index futures and spot index, it's proved that there is closing "walking-dog" relation between index futures and spot index in our market under order liquidity level. It is not easy to achieve a small quantity of profits from high-frequency futures-spot arbitrage by digging high-frequency trading orders. Secondly, the adjustments on changes of stocks' prices imposed by traders' information can be reflected by return measured by trading volume, which is closer to normal distribution than return measured by time.
LIU Rui-zhi, ZHOU Yong
. “Walking-the-Dog”Effect under Order Liquidity in Futures and Spots Market——Based on High-Frequency Trading Data with Volume-Clock[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016
, 24(4)
: 19
-26
.
DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.04.003
[1] Stoll H R,Whaley R E. Program trading and expiration-day effects[J]. Financial Analysts Journal,1987,43(2):16-28.
[2] Stoll H R,Whaley R E. Expiration-day effects of the all ordinaries share price index futures: Empirical evidence and alterbative settlement procedures[J]. Australin Journal of Management, 1997,22(2):139-174.
[3] Robert A J. Derivative security markets, market manipulation, and option pricing theory[J].Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1994, 29(2): 241-261.
[4] Chow K C, Yung H H M, Zhang Hua. Expiration day effects: The case of Hong Kong[J]. Journal of Futures Markets, 2003,23(1):67-86.
[5] 姚亚伟,廖士光. 股指期货与股票现货市场竞争关系研究_来自中国的经验证据[J].证券市场导报,2011,(9),43-50.
[6] 方匡南,蔡振忠. 我国股指期货价格发现功能研究[J].统计研究,2012,29(5):73-78.
[7] 周伍阳,李攀艺. 我国股指期货市场期现联动型操纵行为研究[J].财会月刊,2013,(16):21-23.
[8] Hong Yongmiao, Liu Yanhui,Wang Shouyang. Granger causality in risk and detection of extreme risk spillover between financial markets[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2009,150(2):271-287.
[9] Hong Yongmiao. A test for volatility spillover with applications to exchange rates[J].Journal of Econometrics, 2001, 103(1):183-224.
[10] 张兵,范致镇,李心丹.中美股票市场的联动性研究[J].经济研究,2010,(11):141-151.
[11] 李志辉,王颖.中国金融市场间风险传染效应分析[J].现代财经,2012,(7):20-36.
[12] Easley D, de Prado M L, O'Hara M. The volume clock: Insights into the high frequency paradigm[J].Journal of Portfolio Management, 2012a,39(1):19-29.
[13] Easley D, de Prado M L, O'Hara M. Flow toxicity and liquidity in a high frequent World[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2012b, 25(5):1457-1493.
[14] Easley D,Engle R F, O'Hara M,et al. Time-varying arrival rates of informed and uninformed traders[J]. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2008, 6(2):171-207.
[15] Easley D, de Prado M L, O'Hara M.Bulk volume classification.Working Paper, 2012c.
[16] Easley D, de Prado M L, O'Hara M. The microstructure of the flash crash: Flow Toxicity, liquidity crashes and the probability of informed trading[J].Journal of Portfolio Management,2011,37(2):118-128.
[17] 刘文文,张合金.测量高频交易领域中的指令流毒性—基于我国沪深300指数期货的实证研究[J].中国经济问题,2013,(1):81-90.
