Efforts in cloud service technology research and development and compensation from failure applications are two key count-measures in order to improve the rate of adoption of cloud service in client market. The interactive mechanism between effort, demand and price is proposed according to the role of theirs in integrating cloud service supply chain in this paper, and the coordination of cloud service supply chain is studied based on cost distributions of efforts cost and compensation cost. The research shows that coordination and equilibriums can improve the profits of the whole supply chain and realize Pareto improvement, and different interactive mechanisms have different coordination scopes and conditions based on apportioning parameters of the costs, which can provide some advice for equilibriums making decision of efforts level and compensation promotion. Finally, numerical examples and experiments are applied to illustrate the validity of the proposed method.
LIANG Chang-yong, YE Chun-sen
. Research on Coordinating Cloud Service Supply Chain Based on the Apportioning Mechanism of the Cost of Effort and Compensation[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015
, 23(5)
: 82
-88
.
DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.05.011
[1] Jula A, Sundararajan E,Othman Z. Cloud computing service composition: A systematic literature review[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2014, 41(8): 3809-3824.
[2] Dha S. From outsourcing to cloud computing: Evolution of IT services[J]. Management Research Review, 2012, 35(8): 664-675.
[3] 冯芷艳,郭迅华,曾大军,等.大数据背景下商务管理研究若干前言课题[J].管理科学学报,2013,16(1):1-9.
[4] Gonçalves V, Ballon P. Adding value to the network: Mobile operators' experiments with software-as-a-service and platform-as-a-service models[J]. Telemetric and Informatics, 2011, 28(1):12-21.
[5] Lee S G,Chae S G. Drivers and inhibitors of SaaS adoption in Korea[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2013, 33(3): 429-440.
[6] Demirkan H, Delen D. Leveraging the capabilities of service-oriented decision support systems: Putting analytics and big data in cloud[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2013, 55(1): 412-421.
[7] Fan Ming, Kumar S, Andrew B. Short-term and long-term competition between providers of shrink-wrap software and software as a service[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009,196 (2):661-671.
[8] Benlian A, Marios K. Service quality in software-as-a-Service: Developing the SaaS quality measure and examining its role in usage continuance[J].Journal of Management Information Systems, 2011, 28(3): 85-126.
[9] Dorsch C, Häcke B. Combining models of capacity supply to handle volatile demand: The economic impact of surplus capacity in cloud service environments[J].Decision Support Systems, 2014, 58:3-14.
[10] Demirkan H, Cheng H K. The risk and information sharing of application service supply chain[J].European Journal of Operation Research, 2008, 187(2):756-784.
[11] Demirkan H, Cheng H K, Bandy S. Coordination strategies in a SaaS supply chain[J].Journal of Management Information Systems, 2010, 26(4):119-143.
[12] 郑惠莉,达庆利.移动互联网供应链协调机制研究[J].管理科学学报, 2005, 8(5):31-37.
[13] 但斌,宋寒,张旭梅.服务外包中双边道德风险的关系契约机理机制[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2010, 30(11):1944-1953.
[14] 任怀飞,张旭梅.ASP模式下关键业务应用服务外包中的激励契约研究[J].科研管理,2012,33(11):68-75.
[15] 李新明,廖貅武,刘洋.基于SaaS模式的服务供应链协调研究[J].中国管理科学, 2013, 21(2):98-106.
[16] Tsao Y, Sheen G. Effects of promotion cost sharing policy with the sales learning curve on supply chain coordination[J]. Computers & Operations Research,2012, 39(8):1872-1878.
[17] Taylor T A. Supply chain coordination under channel rebates with sales effort effects[J].management science, 2002, 48(8):992-1007.
[18] Ali S, Schneider S. Viewpoint cloud services certification[J]. Communications of the COM, 2013, 56(2):33-37.
