The existing approaches aren't able to solve the decision problems that evidence sourses are subjective or objective evidence sourses that can't obtain efficient information, and thus we have to look for help from subjecitve knowledge, experience and intuition. In order to solve above problems, the flexible knowledge matrice given by relative estimation modes with complementary judgments are established to derive subjective inference information from decision experts, and a subjective evidence deriving model is constructed to obtain Basic Probability Assignment (BPA) functions from flexible knowledge matrice. After that, four priciples in Brain Storming, i.e., delayed evaluation, independently thinking, quality ensured by quanity, as well as combined to improvment, are introduced to the procedure of deriving subjective evidences, and a integrating and decision making method is proposed to recognize the most possible alternative in the frame of discernment. A numerical comparison analysis and a case simulation analysis are respectively presented to demonstrate the proposed method to be scientific, efficient, and feasible finally.
DU Yuan-Wei, DUAN Wan-Chun, HUANG Qing-Hua, YANG Na
. DecisionMaking Method for Integrating Subjective Evidences Based on Brain Storming Principles[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015
, 23(3)
: 130
-140
.
DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.03.016
[1] Jones L, Beynon M J, Holt C A, et al. An application of the dempster-shafer theory of evidence to the classification of knee function and detection of improvement due to total knee replacement surgery [J]. Journal of biomechanics, 2006, 39(13): 2512-2520.
[2] Deng Yong, Shi Wenkang, Zhu Zhenfu, et al. Combining belief functions based on distance of evidence [J]. Decision Support Systems, 2004, 38(3): 489-493.
[3] 白剑林, 王煜. 一种解决D-S理论证据冲突的有效方法 [J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2009, 31(9): 2106-2109.
[4] 邢清华, 刘付显. 基于证据折扣优化的冲突证据组合方法 [J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2009, 31(5): 1158-1161.
[5] 孙钦清, 廉飞宇, 张元. 一种新的处理冲突证据的方法 [J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2009, 45(35): 101-103.
[6] 刘海燕, 赵宗贵, 刘熹. D-S证据理论中冲突证据的合成方法 [J]. 电子科技大学学报, 2008, 37(5): 701-704.
[7] Jiroušek R. Local computations in dempster-shafer theory of evidence [J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2012, 53(8): 1155-1167.
[8] Xia Meimei, Xu Zeshui. Group decision making based on intuitionistic multiplicative aggregation operators [J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2013,37(7):5120-5133.
[9] 毕鹏程, 席酉民, 王益谊. 群体思维理论的发展及其实证研究综述 [J]. 管理科学学报, 2004, 7(4): 75-84.
[10] Asher L, Collins L M. Assessing synchrony in groups: Are you measuring what you think you are measuring? [J]. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2012, 138(3): 162-169.
[11] Dibagi S G. Brain storming and association in mathematics education [J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, 31: 774-777.
[12] 杜元伟, 孙永河, 段万春. 主观证据交互式提取及融合方法 [J]. 控制与决策, 2011, 26(05): 732-736.
[13] Paksoy A, Göktürk M. Information fusion with dempster-shafer evidence theory for software defect prediction [J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2011, 3:600-605.
[14] Du Yuanwei, Wang Kan, Duan Wanchun. Recognition method for key knowledge subjects in knowledge network [J]. International Review on Computers and Software, 2012, 7(5): 25-34.
[15] Dong Yucheng, Zhang Guiqing, Hong W C, et al. Consensus models for AHP group decision making under row geometric mean prioritization method [J]. Decision Support Systems, 2010, 49(3): 281-289.
[16] Glöckner A, Pachur T. Cognitive models of risky choice: Parameter stability and predictive accuracy of prospect theory [J]. Cognition, 2012, 123(1): 21-32.
[17] Mikhailov L. Deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgements [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2003, 134(3): 365-385.
[18] 王众托. 关于知识管理若干问题的探讨 [J]. 管理学报, 2004, 1(01): 18-24.
