Raw material price fluctuation can induce the seller or the buyer to face the potential risk in the future transactions. In order to reduce the risk, the firms usually use price contracts to make them share the risk of the raw material price fluctuation. In this paper, a supply chain is considered consist of a supplier and a retailer, where the retailer buys the raw material from the supplier at the beginning of the lead time and the supplier delivers the raw material to the retailer some time later. A price flexibility contract is designed to share the profit risk between the supplier and the retailer. Using Stackelberg game the paper built mathematic model to optimize the procurement risk-sharing mechanism and provided the optimal parameters for the flexible supply contract. The results show that supply contract with proper parameters can improve the profit of the supplier and the retailer respectively. By analyzing the profit variance. It is also found that the optimal flexible supply contract can reduce the profit risk of the supplier and the retailer significantly.
MU Yin-ping, LIU Li-ming
. Procurement Policy and Risk Sharing under Price Flexibility Contract[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015
, 23(3)
: 108
-117
.
DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.03.013
[1] 沈沛龙, 邢通政. 国际油价波动与中国成品油价格风险研究[J]. 重庆大学学报, 2011, 17(1): 35-41.
[2] 钱成, 刘宇. 铁矿石定价机制与价格波动研究—与其它大宗商品价格波动比较[J]. 现代矿业, 2009, 481(5): 142-145.
[3] Li C L, Kouvelis P. Flexible and risk-sharing supply contracts under price uncertainty[J]. Management Science, 1999, 45(10): 1378-1397.
[4] Bassok Y, Anupindi R. Analysis of supply contracts with total minimum commitment[J]. IIE Transactions, 1997, 29(5): 373-381.
[5] Tsay A A, Lovejoy W S. Quantity flexibility contracts and supply chain performance[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 1999, 1(2): 89-111.
[6] Kleber R, Schulz T, Voigt G. Dynamic buy-back for product recovery in end-of-life spare parts procurement[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2012, 50(6): 1476-1488.
[7] Chiu C, Choi T, Tang C. Price, rebate, and returns supply contracts for coordinating supply chains with price-dependent demands[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2011, 20(1): 81-91.
[8] Fotopoulos S B, Hu Xiangling, Munson C L. Flexiblesupply contracts under price uncertainty[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 191 (1): 253-263.
[9] 王丽梅, 姚忠, 刘鲁. 现货供应不确定下的优化采购策略研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2011, 14(4): 24-35.
[10] 李建斌, 杨瑞娜. 现货价格和需求关联时期权组合合约模式下采购风险管理策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011, 19(1): 12-20.
[11] 李建斌, 杨瑞娜. 有限供应的现货市场与期权合约下的采购策略[J]. 管理科学学报, 2011, 14(7): 43-54.
[12] 叶青. 多部件采购外包的两阶段均衡投标策略[J]. 管理工程学报, 2012. 26(3): 22-27.
[13] 于辉, 陈剑, 于刚. 回购合同下供应链对突发事件的协调应对[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2005, 25(8): 38-43.
[14] 张菊亮, 陈剑. 销售商的努力影响需求变化的供应链的合约[J]. 中国管理科学, 2004, 12(4): 50-56.
[15] 郭佳, 陈功玉. 制造商需求波动条件下供应链信息分享价值[J]. 系统工程, 2010, 28(2): 82-89.
[16] 索寒生, 金以慧. 非对称信息下供需链中供应商的回购决策分析[J]. 控制与决策, 2004, 19(3): 335-338.
[17] 张钦, 达庆利, 沈厚才. 供应链中基于Stackelberg博弈EOQ模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2002, 10(3): 38-42.
[18] 张双武, 陈新林. 供应链采购订单变更及排期[J]. 系统工程, 2008, 26(4): 77-82.
[19] 王迎军. 顾客需求驱动的供应链合同问题综述[J]. 管理科学学报, 2005, 8(2): 68-76.
[20] 杨德礼, 郭琼, 何勇. 供应链合同研究进展[J]. 管理学报, 2006, 3(1): 117-125.
