海外投资提升了企业环保支出？异质性分析与机制检验

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.1675

Abstract

Abstract:

Although a large number of academic literatures discusses the issue of overseas investment by Chinese companies from different perspectives， so far， there is no literature that analyzes the impact of overseas investment on corporate behavior from the perspective of corporate environmental awareness. The increasing number of Chinese overseas investment enterprises provides an opportunity for us to study this issue. The analysis and discussion of the impact of overseas investment on corporate environmental protection expenditure from the perspective of institutional distance can not only further expand and enrich the relevant research on overseas investment and corporate behavior in theory， but also provide a new perspective and theoretical basis for relevant government departments to formulate relevant policies to enhance the ability of enterprises to develop green and sustainable development.The relevant data of China’s listed companies from 2010 to 2019 and the two-way panel fixed effects model and the PSM-DID measurement method are used to test the impact of overseas investment on corporate environmental awareness and its dynamics， and further whether the heterogeneity of the company and the heterogeneity of the host country change this effect is examined. The research results show that the environmental awareness of overseas investment companies is significantly higher than that of other companies. The impact of overseas investment on corporate environmental awareness is dynamic， and it only help improve corporate environmental awareness after three years of investment. In the eastern region， private enterprises， and heavy-polluting industries， overseas investment has a stronger effect on corporate environmental awareness. When the institutional distance between the host country and China is higher， overseas investment is more conducive to improving corporate environmental awareness. It is conducive to causally identifying the logical relationship between overseas investment， institutional distance and corporate environmental awareness in this article.Accordingly， the following policy recommendations are put forward： First， in the context of complex international situation， the government should guide more enterprises to go global， regulate enterprises' overseas investment behavior， and adopt the reverse spillover effect and learning effect of enterprises in host countries and the institutional constraints of host countries on enterprises' behavior， and improve their own environmental protection efforts. Second， the government should formulate corresponding preferential policies to encourage enterprises to make more strategic long-term foreign investment rather than short-term profitable foreign investment. Third， government should strive to resolve the concerns of private enterprises in making foreign investment， improve the enthusiasm of Chinese private enterprises to go global， and use the interest competition and institutional supervision in the international market to improve the enthusiasm of enterprises in environmental protection. In addition， considering the high proportion of private enterprises in the market， in order to fully mobilize the enthusiasm of private enterprises to protect the environment， while fully releasing the economic vitality of private enterprises， the leadership of the Party should be integrated into all aspects of the governance of private enterprises， and the behavior of private enterprises should be regulated through the leadership of the Party and external systems， so as to promote private enterprises to operate in a more environmentally friendly way. Fourth， while guiding enterprises in the eastern region to invest abroad， the government should focus on promoting the opening up of the central and western regions and the improvement of the legal market， improve the ability of enterprises in the central and western regions to take advantage of the dual system advantages of the host country and China. Fifth， the government should properly guide heavy polluting enterprises to make foreign investment， protect the environmental interests of biochemical enterprises through international competition， and enhance the intensity of environmental protection expenditure of enterprises. Sixth， Chinese enterprises can invest in those countries with a higher distance from China's system， take advantage of the institutional constraints of the two countries， improve the international adaptability of enterprises， and improve the intensity of enterprises' environmental protection expenditure.

Key words: overseas investment, environmental protection expenditure, institutional distance, heterogeneity

CLC Number:

F276.6

Quanjing Wang, Wenzhi Li, Haijie Wang. Does Overseas Investment Improve Corporate Environmental Awareness? Empirical Test Based on Heterogeneity[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(12): 60-70.

Figures/Tables 8

References 38

1	王俏茹，刘达禹，刘廷宇.中国城市污染排放的俱乐部收敛特征及其动态演变［J］.中国管理科学，2024，32（3）：70-81.
	Wang Q R， Liu D Y， Liu T Y. The club convergence and its dynamic evolution of urban pollutant emissions in China［J］.Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2024，32（3）：70-81.
2	张明，薛林昭，王文文.排放权交易与竞争机制下跨界污染控制策略研究［J］.中国管理科学，2023，DOI：10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.0960 .
	Zhang M， Xue L Z， Wang W W. A study of control strategy about transboundary pollution under emission permit trading and competition mechanism［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science，2023，DOI：10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.0960 .
3	张琦，郑瑶，孔东民. 地区环境治理压力、高管经历与企业环保投资——一项基于《环境空气质量标准（2012）》的准自然实验［J］. 经济研究， 2019， 54（6）： 183-198.
	Zhang Q， Zheng Y， Kong D M. Local environmental governance pressure， executive's working experience and enterprise investment in environmental protection： A quasi-natural experiment based on China's “Ambient Air Quality Standards 2012”［J］. Economic Research Journal， 2019， 54（6）： 183-198.
4	Marano V， Tashman P， Kostova T. Escaping the iron cage： Liabilities of origin and CSR reporting of emerging market multinational enterprises ［J］. Journal of International Business Studies， 2017， 48（3）： 386-408.
5	Cheung Y L， Kong D， Tan W， et al. Being good when being international in an emerging economy： The case of China ［J］. Journal of Business Ethics， 2015， 130（4）： 805-817.
6	Marano V， Kostova T. Unpacking the institutional complexity in adoption of CSR practices in multinational enterprises［J］. Journal of Management Studies， 2016， 53（1）： 28-54.
7	昌忠泽，王昱博，李汉雄，等.中国制造业企业海外投资多元化对经营绩效的影响研究［J］.中国软科学，2024，（4）：122-130.
	Chang Z Z， Wang Y B， Li H X， et al. Research on the effect of OFDI diversification of Chinese manufacturing enterprises on business performance［J］. China Soft Science，2024，（4）：122-130.
8	毛其淋，许家云. 中国对外直接投资如何影响了企业加成率：事实与机制［J］.世界经济， 2016， 39（6）： 77-99.
	Mao Q L， Xu J Y. How outward foreign direct investment affects Chinese manufacturing firms' markups： Facts and mechanisms ［J］. World Economy， 2016， 39（6）： 77-99.
9	王全景. 海外投资提升了企业社会责任——基于动态性视角的实证检验［J］. 国际贸易问题， 2018（8）： 135-148.
	Wang Q J. Does overseas investment improve corporate social responsibility： Empirical test from a dynamic perspective［J］. International Trade Issues， 2018（8）： 135-148.
10	Morck R， Yeung B， Zhao M. Perspectives on China's outward foreign direct investment［J］. Journal of International Business Studies， 2008， 39（3）： 337-350.
11	刘宏，张蕾. 中国ODI逆向技术溢出对全要素生产率的影响程度研究［J］. 财贸经济， 2012（1）： 95-100.
	Liu H， Zhang L. Impacts of China's ODI reverse technology spillover on total factor productivity［J］. Finance and Trade Economics， 2012（1）： 95-100.
12	Zhang J， Chen S， Tan H. Is there a relationship between environmental performance and outward FDI？ A study of Chinese MNEs［J］. Multinational Business Review， 2023，32（1）：1-19.
13	Wu H， Chen J， Liu Y. The impact of OFDI on firm innovation in an emerging country［J］. International Journal of Technology Management， 2017， 74（1-4）： 167-184.
14	向宇，代沁雯.“双碳”目标下双向FDI协调发展的碳减排效应及其空间溢出［J］.金融经济学研究，2022，37（2）：105-121.
	Xiang Y， Dai Q W. The carbon emission reduction effect and spatial spillover of two-way FDI coordinated development under the “carbon peaking and carbon neutrality” goals［J］. Financial Economics Research，2022，37（2）：105-121.
15	刘丹阳，黄志刚.金融科技、OFDI与经济高质量发展——基于“双循环”相互促进的视角［J］.中国管理科学，2023，31（11）：151-164.
	Liu D Y， Huang Z G. Fintech， Outward FDI and high-quality economic development： Based on the perspective of “mutual promotion of dual circulation”［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science，2023，31（11）：151-164.
16	冯严超，王晓红，胡士磊.FDI、OFDI与中国绿色全要素生产率——基于空间计量模型的分析［J］.中国管理科学，2021，29（12）：81-91.
	Feng Y C， Wang X H， Hu S L. Effects of FDI and OFDI on green total factor productivity in China： An analysis based on spatial econometric models［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science，2021，29（12）：81-91.
17	董有德，夏文豪.外商直接投资与中国绿色全要素生产率——基于系统GMM和门槛模型的实证研究［J］.上海经济研究，2022（8）：94-106.
	Dong Y D， Xia W H. Foreign direct investment and green total factor productivity in China： An empirical study based on system GMM and threshold model［J］. Shanghai Economic Research，2022（8）：94-106.
18	Long W， Luo L， Sun H， et al. Does going abroad lead to going green？ Firm outward foreign direct investment and domestic environmental performance［J］. Business Strategy and the Environment， 2023，32（1）： 484-498.
19	Liu Y. The role of OFDI in home-country pollution： Insights from LMDI and 3SLS approaches［J］. Environmental Science and Pollution Research， 2023， 30（26）， 68636-68654.
20	Wang C， Wang L. Can outward foreign direct investment improve China’s green economic efficiency？［J］. Environmental Science and Pollution Research， 2023， 30（13）： 37295-37309.
21	Chen D， Zhao X， Wu S. Research on the environmental effects of foreign direct investment： Taking environmental regulations as adjusting variable［J］. AgBioForum， 2023， 25（1）： 215-228.
22	Quang P T. Assessment of impacts of inward and outward fdis on environmental protection in Vietnam［J］. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management， 2023，25（2）： 1-18.
23	Liu H Y， Zhang Q X， Wang Y L， et al. The impact of OFDI on firm pro-environmental behavior： Evidence from China［J］. Advances in Climate Change Research， 2023， 14（5）： 778-788.
24	高伟，王全景. 海外直接投资与股票流动性——基于动态性和异质性的实证分析［J］. 西南民族大学学报（人文社会科学版）， 2021. 42（1）： 98-108.
	Gao W， Wang Q J. Overseas direct investment and stock liquidity： An empirical analysis based on dynamics and heterogeneity［J］. Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities （Humanities and Social Sciences Edition）， 2021， 42（1）： 98-108.
25	王全景，温军. 地方官员变更与企业创新——基于融资约束和创新贡献度的路径探寻［J］. 南开经济研究， 2019（3）： 198-225.
	Wang Q J， Wen J. Change of local officials and enterprise innovation： A path exploration based on financing constraints and innovation contribution degree［J］. Nankai Economic Research， 2019（3）： 198-225.
26	张功富. 政府干预、环境污染与企业环保投资——基于重污染行业上市公司的经验证据［J］. 经济与管理研究， 2013（9）： 38-44.
	Zhang G F. Government intervention， environmental pollution and enterprise environmental protection investment： Empirical evidence based on listed companies in heavily polluting industries［J］. Economics and Management Research， 2013（9）： 38-44.
27	唐国平，李龙会，吴德军. 环境管制、行业属性与企业环保投资［J］. 会计研究， 2013（6）： 83-89+96.
	Tang G P， Li L H， Wu D J. Environmental regulation， industry attribute and enterprise environmental protection investment［J］. Accounting Research， 2013（6）： 83-89+96.
28	王舒扬，吴蕊，高旭东，等. 民营企业党组织治理参与对企业绿色行为的影响［J］. 经济管理， 2019， 41（8）： 40-57.
	Wang S Y， Wu R， Gao X D， et al. The influence of party organization governance participation in private enterprises on corporate green behavior［J］. Economic Management， 2019， 41（8）： 40-57.
29	王建明. 环境信息披露、行业差异和外部制度压力相关性研究——来自我国沪市上市公司环境信息披露的经验证据［J］. 会计研究， 2008（6）： 54-62+95.
	Wang J M. Research on the correlation between environmental information disclosure， industry differences and external institutional pressure： Empirical evidence from the environmental information disclosure of Shanghai listed companies in China［J］. Accounting Research， 2008（6）： 54-62+95.
30	宗芳宇，路江涌，武常岐. 双边投资协定、制度环境和企业对外直接投资区位选择［J］. 经济研究， 2012， 47（5）： 71-82+146.
	Zong F Y， Lu J Y， Wu C Q. Bilateral investment treaty， institutional environment and location choice of enterprises' FDI［J］. Economic Research Journal， 2012， 47（5）： 71-82+146.
31	王永钦，杜巨澜，王凯. 中国对外直接投资区位选择的决定因素：制度、税负和资源禀赋［J］. 经济研究， 2014， 49（12）： 126-142.
	Wang Y Q， Du J L， Wang K. The determinants of location choice of China's OFDI： System， tax burden and resource endowment［J］. Economic Research Journal， 2014， 49（12）： 126-142.
32	朱婕，任荣明. 东道国制度环境、双边投资协议与中国企业跨国并购的区位选择［J］. 世界经济研究， 2018（3）： 109-126+136-137.
	Zhu J， Ren R M. Institutional environment of host country， bilateral investment agreement and location choice of Chinese enterprises' cross-border M&A［J］. World Economic Research， 2018（3）： 109-126+136-137.
33	宋林，彬彬，乔小乐. 制度距离对中国海外投资企业社会责任影响研究——基于国际经验的调节作用［J］. 北京工商大学学报（社会科学版）， 2019， 34（2）： 90-103.
	Song L， Bin B， Qiao X L. A study on the impact of institutional distance on corporate social responsibility in Chinese overseas investment： The moderating effect based on international experience［J］. Journal of Beijing Technology and Business University （Social Sciences Edition）， 2019， 34（2）： 90-103.
34	Dong Y， Tian J， Wen Q. Environmental regulation and outward foreign direct investment： Evidence from China［J］. China Economic Review， 2022， 76： 101877.
35	Zhang Z B， Dong， W Y， Tang Z Y. The carbon reduction effect of China’s outward foreign direct investment for carbon neutrality target［J］. Environmental Science and Pollution Research， 2022， 29（55）： 83956-83968.
36	赵宸宇，李雪松. 对外直接投资与企业技术创新——基于中国上市公司微观数据的实证研究［J］. 国际贸易问题， 2017（6）： 105-117.
	Zhao C Y， Li X S. Foreign direct investment and enterprise technological innovation： An empirical study based on micro data of Chinese listed companies［J］. International Trade Issues， 2017（6）： 105-117.
37	谢东明. 地方监管、垂直监管与企业环保投资——基于上市A股重污染企业的实证研究［J］. 会计研究， 2020（11）： 170-186.
	Xie D M. Local regulation， vertical regulation and enterprise environmental protection investment： An empirical study based on listed A-share heavily polluting enterprises［J］. Accounting Research， 2020（11）： 170-186.
38	韩永辉，王贤彬，韦东明，等. 双边投资协定与中国企业海外并购——来自准自然实验的证据［J］. 财经研究， 2021， 47（4）： 33-48.
	Han Y H， Wang X B， Wei D M， et al. Bilateral investment treaties and Chinese companies' overseas mergers and acquisitions： Evidence from quasi-natural experiments［J］. Research of Finance and Economics， 2021， 47（4）： 33-48.

变量类型	变量名称	变量符号	变量定义
被解释变量	企业环保支出	Envirpro	企业当年的环保支出占企业资产规模的百分比
解释变量	海外直接投资	Oversea	若企业在样本期间内某一年进行海外投资，则把企业当年及之后年份定义为海外投资企业，Oversea =1；否则，Oversea=0。
控制变量	企业层面
	股权集中度	CR	当年前十大股东持股数量之和/总股数
	董事人数	DSRS	当年年末董事会所有董事人数
	独董人数	DDRS	当年年末独立董事人数
	两权分离	LQFL	所有权和经营权分离的程度
	两职合一	LZHY	董事长和总经理是否为同一人，若是，LZHY=1，否则，0
	净资产收益率	ROE	息税前利润总额/净资产平均总额
	财务杠杆	CWGG	企业年末总负债/总资产
	企业风险	ZHGG	企业当年普通股每股利润变动率/销售量变动率
	流动比率	LDR	企业年末流动资产/流动负债
	企业规模	Size	企业年末总资产的自然对数
	企业属性	Nature	根据企业实际控制人性质生成虚拟变量
	行业集中度	HHI	利用行业内企业营业收入逐年计算赫芬达尔指数
	行业ROA	INDROA	以总资产为权重，行业内企业总资产报酬率加权取均值
	行业LEV	INDLEV	以总资产为权重，行业内企业总资产负债率加权取均值

Variable	N	Mean	SD	Min	Median	Max
Envirpro	4827	14.633	1.921	0.000	14.535	20.299
Oversea	4827	0.100	0.297	0.000	0.000	1.002
CR	4827	57.285	15.623	22.582	57.088	94.737
DSRS	4827	8.895	1.816	4.010	8.968	19.026
DDRS	4827	3.272	0.639	0.000	2.977	8.052
LQFL	4827	5.602	8.270	-35.351	0.000	40.284
LZHY	4827	1.795	0.405	1.010	1.994	2.018
ROE	4827	-0.006	1.894	-75.306	0.059	26.833
CWGG	4827	1.568	1.372	-0.741	1.115	7.594
ZHGG	4827	2.853	3.574	-2.509	1.683	18.713
LDR	4827	2.081	2.937	0.000	1.335	68.968
Size	4827	22.416	1.169	18.804	21.984	27.851
Nature	4827	0.526	0.498	0.000	0.993	1.003
HHI	4827	0.099	0.096	0.015	0.071	1.009
Indroa	4827	0.040	0.045	-0.226	0.038	0.876
Indlev	4827	0.453	0.107	0.173	0.421	1.465

变量	(1)	(2)	(3)	(4)	(5)
Oversea	0.348^*	0.268^**	0.256^**	0.258^***	0.240^***
Oversea	(1.71)	(2.46)	(2.51)	(2.91)	(2.58)
CR		0.203	0.206	0.345	0.893^**
CR		(0.89)	(0.60)	(1.13)	(2.40)
DSRS		-0.025^***	-0.033^***	-0.026^***	0.005
DSRS		(-3.53)	(-3.92)	(-3.36)	(0.72)
DDRS		0.020	-0.083	-0.084	-0.423^*
DDRS		(0.36)	(-0.99)	(-1.08)	(-1.82)
LQFL		-0.004	0.016	0.008	0.081^***
LQFL		(-0.55)	(1.04)	(0.78)	(3.87)
LZHY		-0.009	-0.110^**	-0.104^**	0.326^***
LZHY		(-0.23)	(-2.03)	(-2.06)	(4.80)
ROE			0.094	0.084	0.232
ROE			(1.26)	(1.19)	(1.47)
CWGG			0.959^***	0.817^***	0.663^***
CWGG			(9.71)	(9.37)	(7.48)
ZHGG			-0.327	-0.014	-0.311
ZHGG			(-0.87)	(-0.03)	(-0.88)
LDR			-0.544^***	-0.486^***	-0.126^***
LDR			(-18.31)	(-19.91)	(-6.18)
Size				-0.347	0.106
Size				(-0.65)	(0.17)
Nature				0.030	-0.004
Nature				(1.16)	(-0.14)
HHI					-0.931^**
HHI					(-2.29)
Indroa					-0.140
Indroa					(-0.31)
Indlev					-0.848^*
Indlev					(-1.70)
年份	控制	控制	控制	控制	控制
个体	控制	控制	控制	控制	控制
Cons	17.517^***	6.592^***	10.605^***	8.709^***	7.169^***
Cons	(6.43)	(5.14)	(5.64)	(4.99)	(3.94)
N	4827	4018	3902	3629	3629
R²	0.128	0.132	0.138	0.142	0.167
F	4.15	3.00	3.74	6.58	12.50

变量	（1）Envirpro	(2)Git+1	(3)Git+2	(4)ESG	(5)ENV
Oversea_share	1.239^***
Oversea_share	(3.61)
Oversea		4.350^***	1.872^***	0.597^***	0.905^***
Oversea		(7.03)	(7.51)	(2.78)	(2.47)
控制变量	控制	控制	控制	控制	控制
年份	控制	控制	控制	控制	控制
个体	控制	控制	控制	控制	控制
Cons	9.358^***	40.522^***	41.134^***	2.825	5.454^***
Cons	(4.29)	(18.83)	(21.61)	(1.24)	(2.75)
N	3629	3608	3215	2652	3629
R²	0.172	0.196	0.154	0.144	0.107
F	19.24	100.38	67.66	121.48	101.31

变量	(1) PSM 1∶1	(2) PSM 1∶3
Before1	0.360	-0.149
Before1	(0.60)	(-0.79)
Before2	0.895	0.100
Before2	(1.27)	(0.39)
Treat	0.155	0.201
Treat	(0.82)	(0.89)
Time	-0.008	0.130
Time	(-0.13)	(0.95)
Treat×Time	0.808^***	0.904^***
Treat×Time	(8.03)	(5.86)
控制变量	控制	控制
年份	控制	控制
Cons	-6.579^***	-8.503^***
Cons	(-15.68)	(-14.35)
N	1026	1662
R²	0.268	0.307
F	44.60	66.70

Does Overseas Investment Improve Corporate Environmental Awareness? Empirical Test Based on Heterogeneity

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 38

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

变量	（一）区域位置		（二）产权性质		（三）行业
变量	(1)东部	(2)非东部	(3)国有	(4)非国有	(5)重污染	(6)非重污染
TreatTime*	2.692^**	-0.088	0.543	0.870^**	0.633^**	0.309
TreatTime*	(2.25)	(-0.20)	(1.47)	(2.43)	(2.57)	(1.17)
控制变量	控制	控制	控制	控制	控制	控制
年份	控制	控制	控制	控制	控制	控制
Bdiff检验	2.780^** (0.023)		-0.327^** (0.018)		0.324^** (0.016)
Cons	-6.123^***	-2.156^***	-1.367^***	-1.629^***	-2.810^***	-1.161^***
Cons	(-20.43)	(-15.15)	(-13.46)	(-13.02)	(-14.89)	(-11.97)
N	574	449	432	591	535	487
R²	0.268	0.308	0.188	0.175	0.179	0.116
F	34.88	52.57	23.24	22.63	26.32	14.66

变量	(1)OECD国家	(2)非OECD国家	(3)“一带一路”国家	(4)“非一带一路”国家
Treat×Time	2.973^**	0.057	1.901^***	0.070
Treat×Time	(2.33)	(1.05)	(4.45)	(1.28)
控制变量	控制	控制	控制	控制
年份	控制	控制	控制	控制
Bdiff检验	2.916^*** (0.007)		1.821^*** (0.001)
Cons	2.996^***	2.760^**	2.868^***	3.044^*
Cons	(2.65)	(2.57)	(2.58)	(1.79)
N	386	850	478	758
R²	0.152	0.145	0.158	0.244
F	18.196	21.688	15.822	25.465

变量	（一）公司治理		（二）媒体关注度		（三）股票流动性
变量	(1) AC1	(2) Envirpro	(3) MC	(4) Envirpro	(5) Amihud	(6) Envirpro
Treat×Time	-2.567^**		0.210^***		-1.145^***
Treat×Time	(-2.27)		(11.71)		(-2.87)
AC1		-1.028^***
AC1		(-3.06)
MC				8.850^***
MC				(4.46)
Amihud						-1.994^***
Amihud						(-3.68)
Sobel	2.023^**(0.043)		1.664^*(0.096)		1.846^*(0.065)
控制变量	控制	控制	控制	控制	控制	控制
年份	控制	控制	控制	控制	控制	控制
Cons	7.255^***	7.531^***	0.609	0.100	4.055^***	-3.014
Cons	(3.34)	(13.48)	(1.32)	(0.15)	(5.37)	(-1.44)
N
R²	0.165	0.225	0.154	0.108	0.113	0.023
F	44.165	41.645	29.544	83.476	73.205	96.499

[1]	Yu Zhang,Xiang Gao,Junrong Zhang,Cuihong Yang. The Effects of Anti-dumping on China's Export from the Perspective of Enterprise Heterogeneity [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(7): 45-53.
[2]	Baomei Ma,Sifeng Liu,Jian Liu. Service Mechanism and Pricing Based on Fairness Preference of Regular Customers for Non-Monopoly System [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(2): 141-151.
[3]	Tao Jiang,Li Gao,Lu Liu,Xudong Chai. Information Heterogeneity in a Queue: Pricing Decision in Waiting Service Systems with Word-of-mouth [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(10): 123-132.
[4]	SONG Yan, LIU Yue-ting, ZHANG Lu-guang. Heterogeneous Institutional Investors and Corporate Reputation:Social Responsibility: Intermediate Effect Test Based on Corporate Social Responsibility [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(7): 103-114.
[5]	CHEN Ting-qiang, WANG Jie-peng, YANG Xiao-guang. Bilayer-Coupled Network Evolution Model of Counterparty Credit Risk Contagion in the CRT Market [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(4): 260-274.
[6]	Wei LIU,Ke XU. A Game Analysis on the Impact of External Knowledge on Process Innovation Considering Manufacturer's Heterogeneity [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(12): 175-184.
[7]	Hua CHEN,Xiao-ya ZHENG,Rong CHEN,Nai-ju SHI. An Interest Rate Term Structure Model Based on the Hypothesis of Irrational Traders: A Theoretical and Empirical Study [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(12): 79-86.
[8]	CHEN Guo-quan, WANG Jing-yi, LIN Yan-ling, LIU Wei, ZHOU Qi-wei, XU Fen. A Study on the Model of Multi-individual Learning from Experience: From the Perspectives of Information Heterogeneity and Analytic Method Heterogeneity [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(1): 187-199.
[9]	WANG Zheng-xin, LI Dan-dan,. Nonlinear Effects of Financial Inclusion on the Industrial Structure in China: An Empirical Analysis Based on a PSTR Model [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(8): 69-81.
[10]	PENG Hui, SHEN Neng. The Impact of Network Practices on Green Supply Chain Knowledge Sharing in Aggregation Scenarios——Taking Eco-industrial Park as An Example [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(6): 233-243.
[11]	SONG Yan, ZHANG Ming. Research on High-quality Development Considering Inter Regional Environmental Investment Strategy Interaction [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(3): 66-75.
[12]	ZHANG Zi-jian, ZHANG Ling-ling. Marketing Strategy Choice and Pricing for Complementary Products in Supply Chain with Heterogeneous Consumers [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(7): 160-170.
[13]	LINGHU Da-zhi, WU Xin-li, YE Fei. Carbon Quota Allowance & Trading Mechanism Considering Double Heterogeneity [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(3): 176-187.
[14]	ZHU Li, CAO Jie, GU Jun, ZHENG Yi. Dynamic Routing-allocation Optimization of Post-disaster Emergency Resource Considering Heterogeneous Behaviors [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(12): 151-161.
[15]	ZHOU Qi, YOU Zuo-wei, LIU Shan-cun, HAN Jing-ti. Study on Insider Manipulation with Belief Heterogeneity [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(10): 77-87.