考虑专家知识结构的不完备型多属性大群体决策方法

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2017.12.018

中国管理科学 ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (12): 167-178.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2017.12.018

考虑专家知识结构的不完备型多属性大群体决策方法

杜元伟, 王素素, 杨宁, 周雯

中国海洋大学管理学院, 山东青岛 266100

收稿日期:2016-03-10 修回日期:2016-05-19 出版日期:2017-12-20 发布日期:2018-02-10
通讯作者: 杜元伟(1981-),男(汉族),吉林白山人,中国海洋大学管理学院,教授,博士生导师,研究方向:管理决策、信息融合,E-mail:duyuanwei@ouc.edu.cn E-mail:duyuanwei@ouc.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（71462022，71261011）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项（201762026）；山东省软科学研究计划重点项目（2016RZE29001）；泰山学者工程专项经费资助项目

Multiple Attribute Large-group Decision-making Method with Incomplete Information by Considering Expert's Knowledge Structure

DU Yuan-wei, WANG Su-su, YANG Ning, ZHOU Wen

Management College, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China

Received:2016-03-10 Revised:2016-05-19 Online:2017-12-20 Published:2018-02-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 随着管理实践问题的日趋复杂，基于现代信息技术的大群体决策已成为近年来备受关注的重点研究课题。为了解决现有大群体决策方法中并未考虑专家知识结构影响的问题，首先从领域性、不完备性、可靠性三个视角对该类决策问题的性质和特征进行了描述和界定，并应用基本信任分配函数提出了不完备性推断信息的提取机理，然后以证据推理规则为技术基础，分别结合补偿性和非补偿性融合策略提出了对专家个体和专家群体的推断信息进行融合的方法和定理，在此基础上遵循先个体融合后群体融合的思路构建了考虑专家知识结构的大群体决策方法步骤，最后应用数值对比分析验证了提出方法的科学性和有效性。创新之处不仅体现在推断信息提取机理能够充分反映专家知识结构的影响，而且还体现在融合方法考虑了属性权重和专家可靠性的性质差异，可以反映属性信息之间的补偿性以及专家信息之间的非补偿性。这为提高和保证大群体决策的效率和效果将起到重要支撑作用。

关键词: 知识结构, 大群体决策, 多属性决策, 不完备性决策, 不确定性决策

Abstract: With management practice problems becoming more and more complex, the large-group decision making based on modern information technology has been a noteworthy research topic recently. The large-group decision making may be influenced by expert's knowledge structure,which is not considered in existing methods. In order to solve above problem, the properties and characteristics are described and defined from three perspectives such as territoriality, incompleteness and reliability, and the mechanism for extracting incomplete inference information is presented by applying basic belief assignment function. Then the methods and theorems are constructed for fusing inference information of individual expert and expert's group respectively with compensatory strategy and non-compensatory strategy, both of which are technologically based on evidence reasoning rule. The procedure of multiple attribute large-group decision-making method with incomplete information by considering expert's knowledge structure is proposed by following the fusion thought that "from individual fusion to group fusion". The numerical comparison analysis shows the proposed method is scientific and effective finally. The innovation points of the proposed method are not only to reflect the influences by expert's knowledge structure within the mechanism for extracting incomplete inference information, but also to distinguish the differences between expert reliabilities and attribute weights and reflect the compensatory among attributes and the non-compensatory among experts. This will play an important supporting role in improving and ensuring the efficiency and effectiveness of large group decision making.

Key words: knowledge structure, large-group decision making, multiple attribute decision-making, incomplete decision-making, decision making under uncertainty

中图分类号:

杜元伟, 王素素, 杨宁, 周雯. 考虑专家知识结构的不完备型多属性大群体决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(12): 167-178.

DU Yuan-wei, WANG Su-su, YANG Ning, ZHOU Wen. Multiple Attribute Large-group Decision-making Method with Incomplete Information by Considering Expert's Knowledge Structure[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017, 25(12): 167-178.

参考文献

[1] Zahir S. Clusters in a group:Decision making in the vector space formulation of the analytic hierarchy process[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1999, 112(3):620-634.

[2] 陈晓红,刘蓉. 改进的聚类算法及在复杂大群体决策中的应用[J]. 系统工程与电子技术,2006, 28(11):1695-1699.

[3] 徐选华,范永峰. 改进的蚁群聚类算法及在多属性大群体决策中的应用[J]. 系统工程与电子技术,2011, 33(2):346-349.

[4] Liu Bingsheng, Shen Yinghua, Chen Yuan, et al. A two-layer weight determination method for complex multi-attribute large-group decision-making experts in a linguistic environment[J]. Information Fusion,2015, 23:156-165.

[5] 田晓娟,王利东. 基于AFS理论的大群体决策中决策者权重确定方法[J]. 科学技术与工程,2015, 15(15):61-65.

[6] 张晓,樊治平. 一种基于证据推理的多指标多标度大群体决策方法[J]. 运筹与管理,2011, 20(2):15-20, 27.

[7] 张晓,樊治平. 基于前景随机占优的多属性多标度大群体决策方法[J]. 控制与决策,2014, 29(8):1429-1433.

[8] 张晓,樊治平. 一种基于随机占优准则的多指标多标度大群体决策方法[J]. 系统工程,2010, 28(2):24-29.

[9] Liu Yang, Fan Zhiping, Zhang Xiao. A method for large group decision-making based on evaluation information provided by participators from multiple groups[J]. Information Fusion,2016, 29:132-141.

[10] Xu Xuanhua, Zhong Xiangyu, Chen Xiaohong, et al. A dynamical consensus method based on exit-delegation mechanism for large group emergency decision making[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2015, 86:237-249.

[11] Liu Bingsheng, Shen Yinghua, Chen Xiaohong, et al. A complex multi-attribute large-group PLS decision-making method in the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2014, 38(17-18):4512-4527.

[12] 徐选华,万奇锋,陈晓红,等. 一种基于区间直觉梯形模糊数偏好的大群体决策冲突测度研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(8):115-122.

[13] 江文奇,丁健美. 基于参考点的大群体信息融合方法[J]. 系统工程, 2013, 31(11):8-12.

[14] Jiang Yuan, Xu Zeshui, Yu Xiaohan. Group decision making based on incomplete intuitionistic multiplicative preference relations[J]. Information Sciences, 2015, 295:33-52.

[15] 李德毅,杜鹢. 不确定性人工智能[M]. 北京:国防工业出版社, 2005.

[16] Yang Jianbo, Xu Dongling. Evidential reasoning rule for evidence combination[J]. Artificial Intelligence,2013, 205:1-29.

[17] Fu Chao, Chin K. Robust evidential reasoning approach with unknown attribute weights[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2014, 59:9-20.

[18] Pipes R. Property and freedom[M]. New York:Knopf Doubleday, 1999.

[19] 杜元伟,杨娜. 大数据环境下双层分布式融合决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(5):144-154.

[20] 杜元伟,段万春,黄庆华,等. 基于头脑风暴原则的主观证据融合决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(3):130-140.

[21] 徐选华,王敏赛,陈晓红. 偏好冲突优化的多属性多阶段大群体决策方法[J]. 系统工程学报, 2014, 29(1):6.

[22] Chin K, Fu Chao, Wang Yingming. A method of determining attribute weights in evidential reasoning approach based on incompatibility among attributes[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,2015, 87:150-162.

[23] Kong Guilan, Xu Dongling, Yang Jianbo, et al. Combined medical quality assessment using the evidential reasoning approach[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, 42(13):5522-5530.

[24] Roselló L, Sánchez M, Agell N, et al. Using consensus and distances between generalized multi-attribute linguistic assessments for group decision-making[J]. Information Fusion, 2014, 17(0):83-92.

[25] Mkrtchyan L, Podofillini L, Dang V N. Bayesian belief networks for human reliability analysis:A review of applications and gaps[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2015, 139:1-16.

[26] Smets P. Combination of evidence in the transferable belief model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1990, 12(5):447-458.

考虑专家知识结构的不完备型多属性大群体决策方法

Multiple Attribute Large-group Decision-making Method with Incomplete Information by Considering Expert's Knowledge Structure

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	李鹏, 沈志杰. 基于Heronian平均算子的Pythagorean模糊不确定语言决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(1): 217-225.
[2]	张发明, 王伟明. 基于后悔理论和DEMATEL的语言型多属性决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(6): 201-210.
[3]	范建平, 刘胜男, 吴美琴. 单值Neutrosophic sets环境下基于参照系数的VIKOR方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(6): 136-145.
[4]	张健. 基于HTFWGBM算子的供应商选择模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(3): 137-143.
[5]	曾守桢, 穆志民. 基于混合加权距离的毕达哥拉斯模糊TOPSIS多属性决策方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(3): 198-205.
[6]	潘亚虹, 耿秀丽. 基于Mo-RVIKOR的混合多属性决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(12): 143-151.
[7]	余高锋, 李登峰, 吴坚, 叶银芳. 考虑决策者损失规避的异质信息多属性变权决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(9): 141-147.
[8]	李春好, 李巍, 何娟, 李孟姣, 马慧欣. 目标导向层次分析方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(9): 170-182.
[9]	陈国权, 吴凡. 学习迁移的系统理论:PPEE理论模型的建构和意义[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(9): 183-196.
[10]	徐海军, 田晓丽, 徐泽水. 基于犹豫模糊语言信息的前景决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(8): 179-185.
[11]	李春好, 李孟姣, 田硕. 属性集容量确定的夹挤式测度模式及其推算模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(3): 117-125.
[12]	杜涛, 冉伦, 李金林, 曹雪丽. 基于效率的组织多属性决策及实证研究：DEA-TOPSIS组合方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(7): 153-162.
[13]	李海涛, 罗党, 韦保磊. 不确定语言评价信息下大群体决策的MC-EMD方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(4): 164-173.
[14]	丁涛, 梁樑. 基于方案占优和排序稳健性的多属性决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(8): 132-138.
[15]	刘德海. 基于最大偏差原则的群体性事件应急管理绩效评价模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(4): 138-147.