主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 360-368.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2023.1421

• • 上一篇    

区块链赋能的低碳市场制造商产量竞争与碳减排技术合作

南江霞, 吴小勇, 张茂军()   

  1. 苏州科技大学商学院,江苏 苏州 215009
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-24 修回日期:2023-11-08 出版日期:2025-06-25 发布日期:2025-07-04
  • 通讯作者: 张茂军 E-mail:zhang1977108@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省社会科学基金项目(22GLB009);国家自然科学基金项目(72061007)

Production Competition and Emission Reduction Technology Cooperation between Manufacturers under the Low-carbon Market Based on Blockchain Technology

Jiangxia Nan, Xiaoyong Wu, Maojun Zhang()   

  1. School of Business,Suzhou University of Science and Technology,Suzhou 215009,China
  • Received:2023-08-24 Revised:2023-11-08 Online:2025-06-25 Published:2025-07-04
  • Contact: Maojun Zhang E-mail:zhang1977108@sina.com

摘要:

在区块链技术赋能的低碳市场,信息共享有利于制造商之间进行碳减排技术合作。本文构建了一个非合作-合作两型博弈模型,研究两个具有不同碳减排效率的制造商进行碳减排技术合作的同时进行产量竞争。首先,将制造商之间的产量竞争看成非合作博弈,将两个制造商的碳减排技术合作、减排投资成本分摊看成合作博弈问题;其次,通过极大极小值定理确定合作博弈联盟的特征函数,并利用Shapley值得到两个制造商的利润分配值;最后,将利润分配值作为非合作博弈的支付值求解纳什均衡,从而得到两个制造商最优的产量、减排水平、成本分摊比例以及利润。进一步,本文讨论了碳交易价格和减排效率等参数对制造商最优策略的影响。研究结果表明:(1)非合作-合作两型博弈可以求解供应链中产量竞争与碳减排技术合作共存问题,即不仅解决了制造商的最优运营决策,而且为供应链提供了协调机制。(2)当减排成本系数处于某阈值时,随着区块链运营成本的增加,制造商都会提高产量和减少碳排放量,且两个制造商提高减排效率都会增大该阈值。(3)碳交易价格影响不同碳减排效率的制造商的运营决策,即碳交易价格越高,对减排效率高的制造商越有利,而不利于减排效率低的制造商。

关键词: 区块链技术, 非合作-合作两型博弈, 供应链协调, 碳减排技术合作

Abstract:

With the rapid development of the economy, a significant increase in carbon emissions, and environment pollution issues have become increasingly serious. With the increasing emphasis on low-carbon economy, governments have implemented many carbon emission policies, such as carbon tax and cap-and-trade policies. In addition, emerging technologies are constantly evolving, such as a blockchain technology, which can promote information sharing due to its decentralized and transparent characteristics. When facing carbon emission regulations, more and more manufacturers are conducting low-carbon technology research and development (R&D) to fulfill their environmental responsibilities. However, low-carbon technology R&D requires long-term investment. Collaborative R&D of low-carbon technology among manufacturers is an effective way to not only save costs but also accelerate technological innovation in emission reduction. For example, in order to comply with stricter carbon emission controls, Volkswagen and Toyota share the technological R&D costs and are collaborating to develop battery electric vehicles and fuel cell vehicles. Therefore, in the low-carbon market empowered by blockchain technology, it is worthwhile to explore how manufacturers make production and emission reduction strategies when facing carbon emission regulations.A noncooperative-cooperative biform game model is constructed to examine the issues of simultaneous production competition and technology cooperation on carbon emission reduction (CER) between two manufacturers with different CER efficiency. Firstly, the production competition between two manufacturers is considered as a noncooperative game. Secondly, two manufacturers collaborate on emission reduction technology to share the investments, which can be considered as a cooperative game. The characteristic function of the cooperative game coalition is determined using maximum and minimum theorem. The profits of the coalition are distributed by using the Shapley value. Then, the profits of two manufacturers are obtained by the Nash equilibrium. In conclusion, the optimal solutions of noncooperative-cooperative biform game are determined, which includes optimal production, CER level, profit of each manufacturer, and emission reduction investment sharing ratio. Finally, how parameters such as blockchain operation cost, carbon price and emission reduction efficiency affect two manufacturers' optimal strategies is explored. The following results are found:The noncooperative-cooperative biform game not only solves the optimal operational strategies in the supply chain, but also coordinates the supply chain at the same time. When the emission reduction cost coefficient is at a certain threshold, as the increase of blockchain operation cost, manufacturers will increase production and emission reduction level, and the manufacturer with high CER efficiency and manufacturer with low CER efficiency improve CER efficiency will expand the threshold. The change of carbon price has different impacts on manufacturers with different CER efficiency. The manufacturer with high CER efficiency benefits from higher carbon price, and can make comprehensive decisions by weighing “carbon revenue”, sales profit, market share and other factors.

Key words: blockchain technology, noncooperative-cooperative biform game, supply chain coordination, emission reduction technology

中图分类号: