主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 99-107.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.02.011

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

具有多阶段任务需求的温备份系统可靠性分析

邱慧1, 闫相斌1, 翟庆庆2, 彭锐3   

  1. 1. 北京科技大学经济管理学院, 北京 100083;
    2. 上海大学管理学院, 上海 200444;
    3. 北京工业大学经济与管理学院, 北京 100124
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-13 修回日期:2019-02-20 发布日期:2021-03-04
  • 通讯作者: 翟庆庆(1990-),男(汉族),山东枣庄人,上海大学管理学院,特聘副教授,研究方向:系统可靠性,E-mail:zhaiqing59@126.com. E-mail:zhaiqing59@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(71531013,71671016)

Reliability Analysis of Warm Standby System with Phased Mission Requirements

QIU Hui1, YAN Xiang-bin1, ZHAI Qing-qing2, PENG Rui3   

  1. 1. School of Economics and Management, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 2000444, China;
    3. School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
  • Received:2018-10-13 Revised:2019-02-20 Published:2021-03-04

摘要: 实际工程中很多系统的任务都具有多个阶段,且不同阶段的外界环境及系统需求均可能发生变化,而工作元件可在任意阶段发生失效,为系统的可靠性分析与建模带来了挑战。为增加系统的可靠性,一种常用的设计方法是配置备份元件。针对多阶段任务下基于需求的温备份系统可靠性建模问题,首先提出了一种基于多值决策图的方法,其次给出了处于不同状态的元件可靠性计算公式,最后通过算例表明该模型适用于具有多阶段任务需求的温备份系统可靠性分析。

关键词: 多阶段任务系统(PMS), 温备份元件, 多值决策图, 系统可靠性

Abstract: In phased mission system, the environment and system requirements may change at different stages, and the working elements may fail at any stage, which brings challenges to the reliability analysis and modeling of the system. In order to increase the reliability of the system, a common design method is to configure standby components. Standby methods include hot standby, cold standby and warm standby. In hot standby mode, two or more systems deployed on different devices run simultaneously, one of them is the main working process, the other is the active standby process. When the working process fails, the standby process can take over the tasks of the working process immediately without requiring a start-up time. In order to achieve rapid takeover, hot standby mode needs to copy the tasks in the working process to thestandby process in real time. Using this kind of hot standby technology to ensure the reliability of the system also brings problems such as excessive energy consumption. The main disadvantage of cold standby is that it takes a long time to start the standby process to take over the task. Warm standby is the intermediate state between cold standby and hot standby. In standby state, energy consumption is lower than hot standby, and switching speed is higher than cold standby. From the point of view of reliability model, warm standby can be regarded as the promotion of hot standby and cold standby. The reliability modeling method of warm standby system can also be used in cold standby or hot standby system.
Multi-valued decision graph is a directed acyclic graph, which can reflect the relationship between component state and system state. Most of the existing studies only consider the multi-state of the system and use multi-value decision diagram to analyze the reliability of the system. Few literatures have studied the application of multivalued decision maps in phased mission system reliability analysis.
On the basis of the existing research, the problem of system reliability modeling is presented for phased mission systemwith warm standby components. In the reliability analysis of phased mission system with warm standby components, the multi-valued decision graph method is used to construct the reliability calculation formulas of components in different state distributions, and the model is applied through two examples. Finally, the results of the solution are compared with the simulation values, and the validity and accuracy of the model are verified by the comparison results. The reliability model constructed has certain guiding significance in improving the reliability of aviation systems, military equipment systems and other engineering systems with phased mission requirements.

Key words: phased mission system (PMS), warm standby component, multi-valued decision graph, system reliability

中图分类号: