需求受销售价格与变质时间影响的时滞变质品供应链协调研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.03.015

中国管理科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3): 142-151.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.03.015

需求受销售价格与变质时间影响的时滞变质品供应链协调研究

张云丰^1,2, 王勇², 龚本刚¹, 但斌²

1. 安徽工程大学管理工程学院, 安徽芜湖 241000;
2. 重庆大学经济与工商管理学院, 重庆 400030

收稿日期:2018-09-16 修回日期:2019-05-09 出版日期:2020-03-20 发布日期:2020-04-08
通讯作者: 张云丰(1982—),男(汉族),安徽无为人,安徽工程大学管理工程学院,副教授,博士,硕士生导师,研究方向:物流与供应链管理,E-mail:zhanga-hgcdx@163.com. E-mail:zhanga-hgcdx@163.com
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金重大资助项目（15ZDB169）；国家自然科学基金资助项目（71672015，71671001）；安徽省哲学社科规划基金资助项目（AHSKQ2018D09）；安徽省自然科学基金资助项目（1708085QG168）；安徽省高校自然科学研究重点资助项目（KJ2018ZD0101）

Supply Chain Coordination for Non-instantaneous Deteriorating Item with Demand Dependent on Sales Price and Deterioration Time

ZHANG Yun-feng^1,2, WANG Yong², GONG Ben-gang¹, DAN Bin²

1. School of Management Engineering, Anhui Polytechnic University, Wuhu 241000, China;
2. School of Economics and Business Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China

Received:2018-09-16 Revised:2019-05-09 Online:2020-03-20 Published:2020-04-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在由单个生产商和单个销售商组成的两级时滞变质品供应链中，销售商面临的市场需求受销售价格和物品变质时间影响。分别建立分散决策与集中决策下的时滞变质品供应链定价与补货模型，得到两种决策模式下的销售价格与订货批量均衡解。通过比较两种决策模式发现，集中决策下的销售价格更低且订货批量和预期利润更高。引入数量折扣契约对时滞变质品供应链进行协调，并借助常相对风险规避型效用函数和纳什讨价还价理论来分配协调后的预期利润增量。通过数值算例演示了决策变量求解过程，敏感性分析给出了时滞变质品特性参数变动时对决策变量产生的影响。

关键词: 供应链协调, 时滞变质品, 数量折扣, 收益分配

Abstract: In a two-echelon non-instantaneous deteriorating items supply chain consisted of a single producer and a single retailer, the demand faced by the retailer depends on sales price and deteriorating time of the items. Non-instantaneous deteriorating items is selected which is widely existing in reality as the research object, and the time-varying demand function is constructed in accordance with the characteristics of consumer demand. The pricing and replenishment model of non-instantaneous deteriorating items supply chain under decentralized and centralized decision-making is established, and the equilibrium solutions of sales price and order quantity under two decision-making modes are obtained. By comparing the two decision modes, it is found that the sales price is lower and the order quantity and expected profit are higher under the centralized decision. Therefore, centralized decision-making is superior to decentralized decision-making from the point of view of supply chain system with non-instantaneous deteriorating items, and from the perspective of social welfare. In order to guarantee the expected profit and social welfare under centralized decision-making, the quantity discount contract is introduced to coordinate non-instantaneous deteriorating items supply chain, and the increment of expected profit after coordination is allocated with the help of the utility function of constant relative risk aversion and Nash's bargaining theory. A numerical example is given to demonstrate the process of solving the decision variables. The sensitivity analysis shows the influence on the decision variables caused by the variation of the characteristic parameters of the non-instantaneous deteriorating items.

Key words: supply chain coordination, non-instantaneous deteriorating item, quantity discount, profit distribution

中图分类号:

F253.2

张云丰, 王勇, 龚本刚, 但斌. 需求受销售价格与变质时间影响的时滞变质品供应链协调研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(3): 142-151.

ZHANG Yun-feng, WANG Yong, GONG Ben-gang, DAN Bin. Supply Chain Coordination for Non-instantaneous Deteriorating Item with Demand Dependent on Sales Price and Deterioration Time[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(3): 142-151.

参考文献

[1] 张云丰,王勇,龚本刚,等.需求依赖销售价格与变质时间的三级时滞易变质品供应链协调[J].计算机集成制造系统,2019,25(5):1272-1282.
[2] Ferguson M E, Ketzenberg M E. Information sharing to improve retail produce freshness of perishable[J].Production and Operations Management, 2006,15(1):57-73.
[3] 吴庆,但斌,钱宇,等.努力水平影响损耗的低值易逝品TPL协调合同[J].管理科学学报,2014,17(12):15-26.
[4] Ghare P M, Schrader G F. A model for an exponentially decaying inventory[J]. Journal of Production Research, 1963, 21(5):449-460.
[5] Wu Kunshan, Ouyang Liangyuh, Yang Chihte. An optimal replenishment policy for non-instantaneous deteriorating items with stock-dependent demand and partial backlogging[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2006, 101(2):369-384.
[6] Ouyang Liangyuh, Wu Kunshan, Yang Chihte. A study on an inventory model for non-instantaneous deteriorating items with permissible delay in payments[J]. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 2006, 51(4):637-651.
[7] Chang C, Teng J, Goyal S K. Optimal replenishment policies for non-instantaneous deteriorating items with stock-dependent demand[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2010, 123(1):62-68.
[8] Soni H N. Optimal replenishment policies for non-instantaneous deteriorating items with price and stock sensitive demand under permissible delay in payment[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013, 146(1):259-268.
[9] Maihami R, Abadi I N K. Joint control of inventory and its pricing for non-instantaneously deteriorating items under permissible delay in payments and partial backlogging[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2012, 55(5-6):1722-1733.
[10] Shan N, Soni H N, Patel K A. Optimizing inventory and marketing policy for non-instantaneous deteriorating items with generalized type deterioration and holding cost rates[J]. Omega, 2013, 41(2):421-430.
[11] Chung K, Cárdenas-Barrón L E, Ting P. An inventory model with non-instantaneous receipt and exponentially deteriorating items for an integrated three layer supply chain system under two levels of trade credit[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2014, 155(5):310-317.
[12] Zhang Jianxiong, Wang Yu, Lu Lihao, et al.. Optimal dynamic pricing and replenishment cycle for non-instantaneous deterioration items with inventory-level-dependent demand[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2015, 170:872-880.
[13] Tiwari S, Cárdenas-Barrón L E, Khanna A, et al.. Impact of trade credit and inflation on retailer's ordering policies for non-instantanous deteriorating items in a two-warehouse environment[J].International Journal of Production Economics, 2016, 176:154-179.
[14] 董坤祥,侯文华,陈宗泽,等.信用期下时滞变质品供应链库存和定价的Stackelberg均衡策略[J].运筹与管理,2015,24(6):76-85.
[15] 李贵萍,段永瑞,霍佳震,等.持有成本和变质率时变的非立即变质品库存策略[J].中国管理科学,2015,23(8):122-131.
[16] Zhang Guoqing. The multi-product newsboy problem with supplier quantity discounts and a budget constraint[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 206(2):350-360.
[17] Zhang Qinghong, Luo Jianwen, Duan Yongrui. Buyer-vendor coordination for fixed lifetime product with quantity discount under finite production rate[J]. International Journal of System Science, 2016, 47(4):821-834.
[18] Nie Tengfeng, Du Shaofu. Dual-fairness supply chain with quantity discount contracts[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 258(2):491-500.
[19] Venegas B B, Ventura J A. A two-stage supply chain coordination mechanism considering price sensitive demand and quantity discount[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2018, 264(2):524-533.
[20] 赵泉午,熊中楷,杨秀苔,等.易逝品两级供应链中的数量折扣问题研究[J].系统工程学报,2005,20(3):318-322.
[21] 张钦红,骆建文.不对称信息下易腐物品供应链最优数量折扣合同研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2007,27(12):23-28,35.
[22] 赵正佳.需求不确定且依赖于价格下全球供应链数量折扣及其组合契约[J].管理工程学报,2015,29(3):90-99.
[23] 张云丰,王勇,孙海雷,等.数量折扣激励下考虑缺货的改良品供应链协调[J].计算机集成制造系统,2016,22(3):813-821.
[24] 许甜甜,肖条军.基于数量折扣的时滞变质物品库存协调模型[J].系统工程理论与实践,2013,33(7):1690-1698.
[25] 王勇,孙海雷,陈晓旭.基于数量折扣的改良品供应链协调策略[J].中国管理科学,2014,22(4):51-57.

需求受销售价格与变质时间影响的时滞变质品供应链协调研究

Supply Chain Coordination for Non-instantaneous Deteriorating Item with Demand Dependent on Sales Price and Deterioration Time

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	曹晓宁, 王永明, 薛方红, 刘晓冰. 供应商保鲜努力的生鲜农产品双渠道供应链协调决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(3): 109-118.
[2]	叶同, 关志民, 张大儒, 曲优. Nash讨价还价公平关切下基于低碳商誉的供应链联合减排与广告的动态优化与协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(3): 119-132.
[3]	刘墨林, 但斌, 马崧萱. 考虑保鲜努力与增值服务的生鲜电商供应链最优决策与协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(8): 76-88.
[4]	刘阳, 田军, 冯耕中, 扈衷权. 基于期权契约的政企联合储备应急物资模型与利润分配机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(8): 162-171.
[5]	张旭梅, 王大飞, 任廷海, 官子力, 但斌. 考虑消费者策略行为的供应链两周期定价与契约设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(7): 132-145.
[6]	张玉华, 戴更新, 孙浩, 韩广华, 王磊. 基于信任的供应预测信息共享策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(5): 112-121.
[7]	扈衷权, 田军, 冯耕中. 基于看跌期权契约的应急物资采购储备模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(2): 69-79.
[8]	代建生. 零售商的资金约束对协调契约的影响分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(10): 98-108.
[9]	王芹鹏. 考虑参考减排努力水平效应的联合减排与竞争动态策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(10): 172-182.
[10]	林晶, 王健, 郑敏. 买方抗衡势力下双渠道促销合作微分博弈研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(9): 80-92.
[11]	王绪金, 马骋. 多层供应链外包模式的选择及其协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(8): 151-161.
[12]	王永龙, 付恒, 方新, 蹇明. 突发性产出下的供应链协调应对策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(7): 137-146.
[13]	杜文意, 刘晓婧, 唐小我. 基于融资需求的损失厌恶零售商订货策略及供应链协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(3): 96-104.
[14]	何彦东, 王旭, 周福礼, 周林. 基于双边努力因素的网购供应链协调研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(2): 83-92.
[15]	张云丰, 王勇, 龚本刚, 但斌. 考虑订货协调成本与数量折扣的改良品供应链水平协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(12): 55-66.