企业数字化转型对创新生态系统的影响：基于市场规模动态的多agent模型

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.1987

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 企业数字化转型不仅影响了企业的创新绩效，还通过“自下而上”的作用机制影响着整个创新生态系统的演化。构建了一个多agent模型，在考虑市场规模动态的情况下研究企业数字化转型对创新生态系统的影响。数值实验和案例分析表明，企业数字化转型对创新生态系统的影响与市场规模有着密切的关联。成长型市场条件下，企业数字化转型有力地提升了整个创新生态系统的数字化程度、创新成功率和创新收益。稳定型和衰退型市场条件下，整个创新生态系统的数字化程度和创新成功率到达一定程度后会停滞不前，衰退型市场条件下创新收益还会逐步下降。这意味着并非所有的企业和产业都可以从数字化转型中获益，需要基于市场规模特征进行权变决策。

关键词: 数字化转型；创新生态系统；市场规模；多agent模型

Abstract: Digital transformation not only affects the innovation performance of enterprises, but also affects the evolution of the innovation ecosystem through the “bottom-up” mechanism. In this study, a multi-agent model is built to examine the impact of digital transformation on the innovation ecosystem considering the market size dynamics.Numerical simulations and cases analysis show that the impact of enterprise digital transformation on innovation ecosystem is closely related to market size. In a growing market, the digital transformation significantly enhances the digitization level, the success rate of cooperative innovation, and the innovation performance. In a stable or a recessionary market, the digitalization level and the success rate of innovation stagnate after reaching a certain level. Meanwhile, the innovation performance gradually declines in a recessionary market. The research results indicate that not all enterprises and industries can benefit from digital transformation and need contingency decisions based on the characteristics of market size.

Key words: digital transformation; innovation ecosystem; market size; multi-agent model

中图分类号:

N945
F273

杨伟, 吉梨霞, 周青. 企业数字化转型对创新生态系统的影响：基于市场规模动态的多agent模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(6): 223-232.

YANG Wei, JI Li-xia, ZHOU Qing. Impact of Firms’Digital Transformation on the Innovation Ecosystem：A Multi-agent Model Considering Dynamic of Market Size[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(6): 223-232.

参考文献

［1］ Adamides E D, Karacapilidis N. Information technology support for the knowledge and social processes of innovation management［J］. Technovation, 2006, 26(1): 50-59.
［2］ Song L Z, Song M. The role of information technologies in enhancing R&D–marketing integration: An empirical investigation［J］. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2010, 27(3): 382-401.
［3］ Kleis L, Chwelos P, Ramirez R V, et al. Information technology and intangible Output: The impact of IT investment on innovation productivity［J］. InformationSystems Research, 2012, 23(1): 42-59.
［4］ Cui T, Ye H, Teo H H, et al. Information technology and open innovation: A strategic alignment perspective［J］.Information & Management, 2015, 52(3): 348-358.
［5］ Dong J Q, Netten J. Information technology and external search in the open innovation age: New findings from Germany［J］. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, 120: 223-231.
［6］ Gómez J, Salazar I, Vargas P. Does information technology improve open innovation performance? An examination of manufacturers in Spain［J］. Information Systems Research, 2017, 28(3): 661-675.
［7］ Kaufmann A, Lehner P, Tdtling F. Effects of the internet on the spatial structure of innovation networks［J］. Information Economics and Policy, 2003, 15(3): 402-424.
［8］ Rehm S-V, Goel L. Using information systems to achieve complementarity in SME innovation networks［J］. Information & Management, 2017, 54(4): 438-451.
［9］ Hermosilla M, Wu Y. Market size and innovation: The intermediary role of technology licensing［J］. Research Policy, 2018, 47(5): 980-991.
［10］ Gomes L A D V, Facin A L F, Salerno M S, et al. Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends［J］. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2018, 136: 30-48.
［11］ Hinings B, Gegenhuber T, Greenwood R. Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective［J］. Information and Organization, 2018, 28(1): 52-61.
［12］ Russell M G, Smorodinskaya N V. Leveraging complexity for ecosystemic innovation［J］. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2018, 136: 114-131.
［13］ Freeman C, Soete L. The economics of industrial innovation［M］. (3rd Edition). MA: MIT Press，1997.
［14］ Iansiti M, Levien R. Strategy as ecology［J］. Harvard Business Review, 2004, 82(3): 68-78, 126.
［15］ Roundy P T, Bradshaw M, Brockman B K. The emergence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: A complex adaptive systems approach［J］. Journal of Business Research, 2018, 86: 1-10.
［16］ Estrin J. Closing the innovation gap: Reigniting the spark of creativity in a global economy ［M］. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2009.
［17］ Fukuda K, Watanabe C. Japanese and US perspectives on the national innovation ecosystem［J］. Technology in Society, 2008, 30(1): 49-63.
［18］ Almirall E, Lee M, Majchrzak A. Open innovation requires integrated competition-community ecosystems: Lessons learned from civic open innovation［J］. Business Horizons, 2014, 57(3): 391-400.
［19］ Hess T, Matt C, Benlian A, et al. Options for formulating a digital transformation strategy［J］. MIS Quarterly Executive, 2016, 15(2): 123-139.
［20］ Li Feng. The digital transformation of business models in the creative industries: A holistic framework and emerging trends［J］. Technovation, 2020, 92-93(3-4): 102012
［21］杨伟, 刘婉. 表观遗传经济动态理论框架下制造企业互联网转型模式研究［J］. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(7): 78-84.Yang Wei, Liu Wan. Digital transformation models of manufacturing enterprises: From the perspective of epigenetic economic dynamics［J］. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2019, 36(7): 78-84.
［22］ Russell M G, Smorodinskaya N V. Leveraging complexity for ecosystemic innovation［J］. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2018, 136: 114-131.
［23］沈国兵, 袁征宇. 企业互联网化对中国企业创新及出口的影响［J］. 经济研究, 2020, 55(1): 33-48.Shen Guobing, Yuan Zhengyu. The effect of enterprise internetization on the innovation and export of Chinese enterprise［J］. Economic Research Journal, 2020, 55(1): 33-48.
［24］ Zhang Xi, Chen Hui, Wang Weiguang, et al. What is the role of IT in innovation? A bibliometric analysis of research development in IT innovation［J］. Behaviour& Information Technology, 2016, 35(12): 1130-1143.
［25］ Chen H, Chiang R H L, Storey V C. Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact［J］. MIS Quarterly, 2012, 36 (4): 1165-1188.
［26］ Mulkay B. How does competition affect innovation behavior in French firms?［J］. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2019, 51: 237-251.
［27］尹儇鹏, 徐选华, 陈晓红. 基于多主体仿真的大群体应急决策风险致因分析［J］. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(2): 208-219.Yin Xuanpeng, Xu Xuanhau, Chen Xiaohong. Risk-causing analysis of large group emergency decision-making based on multi-agent simulation［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science,2020,28(2):208-219.
［28］程永波, 宋露露, 陈洪转, 等. 复杂产品多主体协同创新最优资源整合策略［J］. 系统工程理论与实践, 2016, 36(11): 2867-2878.Chen Yongbo, Song Lulu, Chen Hongzhuan, et al. Study on optimal resources integration strategy in multi-agent innovation cooperation of complex products［J］. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2016,36(11): 2867-2878.
［29］ Kwon S, Motohashi K. How institutional arrangements in the national innovation system affect industrial competitiveness: A study of Japan and the U.S. with multiagent simulation［J］. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, 115: 221-235.
［30］ Carayannis E G, Provance M, Grigoroudis E. Entrepreneurship ecosystems: An agent-based simulation approach［J］. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2016, 41(3): 631-653.
［31］ Albino V, Carbonara N, Giannoccaro I. Innovation in industrial districts: An agent-based simulation model［J］. International Journal of Production Economics, 2006, 104(1): 30-45.
［32］ Davis J P, Eisenhardt K M, Bingham C B. Developing theory through simulation methods［J］. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(2): 480-499.
［33］ Berman S J. Digital transformation: Opportunities to create new business models［J］. Strategy & Leadership, 2012, 40(2): 16-24.
［34］ Chen C, Chen Y, Chen M. An aging theory for event life-cycle modeling［J］. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 2007, 37(2): 237-248.
［35］ Ma T, Nakamori Y. Agent-based modeling on technological innovation as an evolutionary process［J］. European Journal of Operational Research, 2005, 166(3): 741-755.
［36］ Walrave B, Talmar M, Podoynitsyna K S, et al. A multi-level perspective on innovation ecosystems for path-breaking innovation［J］. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2018, 136: 103-113.

[1]	杨莲, 石宝峰. 基于Focal Loss修正交叉熵损失函数的信用风险评价模型及实证[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(5): 65-75.
[2]	薛凯丽，范建平，匡海波，赵苗，吴美琴. 基于两阶段交叉效率模型的中国商业银行效率评价[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(10): 23-34.
[3]	于善丽, 迟国泰, 姜欣. 基于指标体系违约鉴别能力最大的小企业债信评级体系及实证[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(6): 38-50.
[4]	王治莹, 聂慧芳, 杨学亮. 考虑公众感知价值的突发性抢购事件演化博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(3): 71-79.
[5]	王治莹, 李勇建, 王伟康. 基于随机Petri网的突发事件信息演化模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(3): 113-121.
[6]	唐健, 郭海湘, 龚承柱, 诸克军. 基于拍卖机制的灾害多主体合作搜救仿真研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(1): 180-190.
[7]	程砚秋, 徐占东. 基于泰尔指数修正的ELECTRE III小企业信用评价模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(10): 22-33.
[8]	陈洪海. 基于病态指数循环分析的评价指标筛选研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(1): 184-193.
[9]	汪大金, 白建明. 基于系统柔性的MTS-MTO混合生产决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(9): 62-74.
[10]	张立辉, 邹鑫, 黄元生, 乞建勋. 重复性项目调度模型的时差分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(6): 95-103.
[11]	王晔, 唐加福, 赵林度. 考虑需求波动的单元装配系统构建问题的多目标模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(4): 57-66.
[12]	范建平, 肖慧, 樊晓宏. 考虑非期望产出的改进EBM-DEA三阶段模型——基于中国省际物流业效率的实证分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(8): 166-174.
[13]	赵志冲, 迟国泰. 基于似然比检验的工业小企业债信评级研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(1): 45-56.
[14]	王治莹, 岳朝龙. 舆情传播中考虑公众风险感知的多资源流应急优化调度[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(6): 115-123.
[15]	王洪波, 罗贺, 杨善林. 基于流形学习的非一致性判断矩阵排序方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(10): 147-155.