基于两阶段交叉效率模型的中国商业银行效率评价

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.1523

中国管理科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (10): 23-34.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.1523

• 论文 • 上一篇

基于两阶段交叉效率模型的中国商业银行效率评价

薛凯丽¹，范建平²，匡海波¹，赵苗²，吴美琴²

1.大连海事大学综合交通运输协同创新中心，辽宁大连116026；2.山西大学经济与管理学院，山西太原030006

收稿日期:2018-10-25 修回日期:2020-04-03 出版日期:2021-10-20 发布日期:2021-10-21
通讯作者: 吴美琴(1980—)，女(汉族)，山西太原人，山西大学经济与管理学院，副教授，研究方向：决策与评价，Email：wmq80@sxu.edu.cn. E-mail:wmq80@sxu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(71831002, 71672016)；山西省“服务产业创新学科群建设计划”项目(XKQ201801);山西省软科学研究计划项目(2017041008-3)

Efficiency Evaluation of China Commercial Banks Based on Two-stage Cross Efficiency Model

XUE Kaili¹, FAN Jianping², KUANG Haibo¹, ZHAO Miao², WU Meiqin²

1. Collaborative Innovation Center for Transport Studies, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China；2. School of Economics and Management, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China

Received:2018-10-25 Revised:2020-04-03 Online:2021-10-20 Published:2021-10-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了更好的评价我国商业银行的效率，在传统两阶段DEA模型中引入交叉效率，并对两阶段生产系统的内部结构进行优化，构建了考虑共享投入和非期望产出的两阶段交叉效率模型。最后结合中国16家商业银行2006-2015年的年度报表，分别应用传统的两阶段DEA模型和新模型评价样本银行的效率。结果表明：新模型比传统模型更客观、区分力更强，具有更强的稳定性，更适合用于评价我国商业银行的效率。

关键词: 两阶段DEA, 交叉效率, 商业银行效率

Abstract: With the rapid development of the China's economy, the healthy development of the Banks is crucial to the China's economy. Under the new situation, commercial banks are faced with various new challenges and opportunities. How to evaluate bank efficiency is the key step to improve bank competitiveness. In order to evaluate the efficiency of China's commercial banks better, the cross efficiency is introduced in the traditional two-stage DEA model, and the internal structure of the two-stage production system is optimized, then a two-stage cross efficiency model considering shared inputs and undesired outputs is constructed. Finally, combined with the 2006-2015 annual financial statement of 16 commercial banks in China, the traditional two-stage DEA model and the new model is used to evaluate the efficiency of the sample banks. The results show that the new model is more objective and more stable than the traditional model, and it is more suitable for evaluating the efficiency of commercial banks in China.

Key words: two-stage DEA, cross efficiency, commercial banks efficiency

中图分类号:

N945

薛凯丽，范建平，匡海波，赵苗，吴美琴. 基于两阶段交叉效率模型的中国商业银行效率评价[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(10): 23-34.

XUE Kaili, FAN Jianping, KUANG Haibo, ZHAO Miao, WU Meiqin. Efficiency Evaluation of China Commercial Banks Based on Two-stage Cross Efficiency Model[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(10): 23-34.

参考文献

[1] Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E L. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units [J] . European Journal of Operational Research, 1978(2): 429-444.
[2] Sherman H D, Gold F. Bank branch operating efficiency: Evaluation with data envelopment analysis [J] . Journal of Banking & Finance, 1985, 9(2): 297-315.
[3] Yang C C. An enhanced DEA model for decomposition of technical efficiency in banking [J] . Annals of Operations Research, 2014, 214(1): 167-185.
[4] Kao C, Liu S T. Multi-period efficiency measurement in data envelopment analysis: The case of Taiwanese commercial banks [J] . Omega, 2014, 47(47): 90-98.
[5] 夏琼, 杨峰, 吴华清. “三重底线”下中国商业银行经营效率及其影响因素分析 [J] .中国管理科学, 2019, 27(8): 26-36.Xia Qiong, Yang Feng, Wu Huaqing. The operational efficiency and analysis of influencing factors of Chinese commercial bank: Perspective of “triple bottom line” [J] . Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(8): 26-36.
[6] 王旭, 蓝以信, 王应明. 考虑规模与时滞双重效应的中国商业银行运营效率分析 [J] . 中国管理科学, 2020, https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.0465.Wang Xu, Lan Yixin, Wang Yingming. The operational efficiency of Chinese commercial banks in consideration of Scale effect and time-lag effect [J] . Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.0465.
[7] Seiford L M, Zhu J. Profitability and marketability of the top 55 U.S. commercial banks [J] . Management Science, 1999, 45(9): 1270-1288.
[8] Fukuyama H, Weber W L. Measuring Japanese bank performance: A dynamic network DEA approach [J] . Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2015, 44(3): 249-264.
[9] Wang Ke, Huang Wei, Wu Jie, et al. Efficiency measures of the Chinese commercial banking system using an additive two-stage DEA [J] . Omega, 2014, 44(2): 5-20.
[10] Zha Yong, Liang Nannan, Wu Maoguo, et al. Efficiency evaluation of banks in China: A dynamic two-stage slacks-based measure approach [J] . Omega,2016,60: 60-72.
[11] Xie Jianhui, Zhu Xiaoxuan, Liang Liang. A multiplicative method for estimating the potential gains from two-stage production system mergers [J] . Annals of Operations Research, 2020, 288(1): 475-493.
[12] Zha Yong, Liang Liang. Two-stage cooperation model with input freely distributed among the stages [J] . European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 205(2): 332-338.
[13] Li Lin, Dai Qianzhi, Huang Haijun, et al. Efficiency decomposition with shared inputs and outputs in two-stage DEA [J] . Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2016, 25(1): 23-38.
[14] Hu Xiaoyan, Cheng Xijun, Ma Lijun. Efficiency evaluation of commercial banks based on two-stage DEA model considering undesirable outputs [J] . Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2013, 30(4): 462-471.
[15] An Qingxian, Chen Haoxun, Wu Jie, et al. Measuring slacks-based efficiency for commercial banks in China by using a two-stage DEA model with undesirable output [J] . Annals of Operations Research, 2015, 235(1): 13-35.
[16] Liu Wenbin, Zhou Zhongbao, Ma Chaoqun, et al. Two-stage DEA models with undesirable input-intermediate-outputs [J] . Omega, 2015, 56: 74-87.
[17] 薛凯丽. 考虑共享投入和非期望产出的我国商业银行效率评价 [D] . 山西大学, 2017.Xue Kaili. Efficiency evaluation of China commercial banks considering shared inputs and undesirable outputs [D] . Shanxi University, 2017.
[18] Zhou Xiaoyang, Xu Zhongwen, Chai Jian, et al. Efficiency evaluation for banking systems under uncertainty: A multi-period three-stage DEA model [J] . Omega, 2019, 85: 68-82.
[19] Sexton T R， Silkman R H， Hogan A J. Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions [J] . New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986, 1986(32): 73-105.
[20] Kao C, Liu S T. Cross efficiency measurement and decomposition in two basic network systems [J] . Omega, 2019, 83: 70-79.
[21] Doyle J, Green R. Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, meanings and uses [J] . Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1994, 45(5): 567-578.
[22] Lim S. Minimax and maximin formulations of cross-efficiency in DEA [J] . Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2012, 62(3): 726-731.
[23] Maddahi R, Jahanshahloo G R, Lotfi F H, et al. Optimising proportional weights as a secondary goal in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation [J] . International Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 19(2): 234-245.
[24] 李春好, 苏航, 佟轶杰,等. 基于理想决策单元参照求解策略的DEA交叉效率评价模型 [J] . 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(2): 116-122.Li Chunhao, Su Hang, Tong Yijie, et al. DEA cross-efficiency evaluation model by the solution Strategy referring to the ideal DMU [J] . Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(2): 116-122.
[25] Lin Ruiyue, Chen Zhipeng, Xiong Wentao. An iterative method for determining weights in cross efficiency evaluation [J] . Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2016, 101: 91-102.
[26] Liang Liang, Wu Jie, Cook W D, et al. The DEA game cross-efficiency model and its Nash equilibrium [J] . Operations Research, 2008, 56(5): 1278-1288.
[27] Wang Yingming, Chin K S. The use of OWA operator weights for cross-efficiency aggregation [J] . Omega, 2011, 39(5): 493-503.
[28] Wu Jie, Sun Jiasen, Liang Liang. DEA cross-efficiency aggregation method based upon Shannon entropy [J] . International Journal of Production Research, 2012, 50(23): 6726-6736.
[29] Angiz M Z, Mustafa A, Kamali M J. Cross-ranking of decision making units in data envelopment analysis [J] . Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2013, 37(1-2): 398-405.
[30] 刘文丽, 王应明, 吕书龙. 基于交叉效率和合作博弈的决策单元排序方法 [J] . 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(4): 163-170.Liu Wenli, Wang Yingming, Lv Shulong. Ranking decision making units based on cross-efficiency and cooperative game [J] . Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(4): 163-170.
[31] 黄衍, 王应明, 林健. 基于广义梯形模糊数相似度的交叉效率集结 [J] . 系统工程理论与实践, 2020, 40(1): 240-250.Huang Yan, Wang Yingming, Lin Jian. The aggregation of cross efficiency matrix by generalized trapezoid fuzzy similarity theory [J] . Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2020, 40(1): 240-250.
[32] Chen Lei, Wang Yingming, Huang Yan. Cross-efficiency aggregation method based on prospect consensus process [J] . Annals of Operations Research, 2020, 288(1): 115-135.
[33] 陈凯华, 官建成. 共享投入型关联两阶段生产系统的网络DEA效率测度与分解 [J] . 系统工程理论与实践, 2011, 31(7): 1211-1221.Chen Kaihua, Guan Jiancheng. Network DEA-based efficiency measurement and decomposition for a relational two-stage production system with shared inputs [J] . Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2011, 31(7): 1211-1221.
[34] Chen Yao, Cook W D, Li Ning, et al. Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA [J] . European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 196(3): 1170-1176.

基于两阶段交叉效率模型的中国商业银行效率评价

Efficiency Evaluation of China Commercial Banks Based on Two-stage Cross Efficiency Model

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 13

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	刘金培, 杨宏伟, 陈华友, 周礼刚. 基于交叉效率DEA与群体共识的区间乘性语言偏好关系群决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(2): 190-198.
[2]	熊曦, 关忠诚, 杨国梁, 郑海军. 嵌套并联结构两阶段DEA下科技创新效率测度与分解[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(3): 206-216.
[3]	张冉, 冉伦, 杜涛, 李金林. 考虑满意度的两阶段DEA固定成本分摊方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(2): 138-149.
[4]	刘文丽, 王应明, 吕书龙. 基于交叉效率和合作博弈的决策单元排序方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(4): 163-170.
[5]	成达建, 薛声家. 基于交叉效率新计算方法的区间效率值排序[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(7): 191-196.
[6]	曾薇, 陈收, 周忠宝. 金融监管对商业银行产品创新影响——基于两阶段DEA模型的研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(5): 1-7.
[7]	李春好, 苏航, 佟轶杰, 孙永河. 基于理想决策单元参照求解策略的DEA交叉效率评价模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(2): 116-122.
[8]	崔玉泉, 张宪, 芦希, 李琳琳. 随机加权交叉效率下的资源分配问题研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(1): 121-127.
[9]	张启平, 刘业政, 姜元春. 决策单元交叉效率的自适应群评价方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(11): 62-71.
[10]	张启平, 刘业政, 姜元春. 决策单元交叉效率的自适应群评价方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(11): 62-71.
[11]	纪建悦, 孔胶胶. 利益相关者关系视角下考虑非期望产出的商业银行效率问题研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013, 21(6): 30-37.
[12]	李春好, 苏航. 基于交叉评价策略的DEA全局协调相对效率排序模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013, 21(3): 137-145.
[13]	王赫一, 张屹山. 两阶段DEA前沿面投影问题研究——兼对我国上市银行运营绩效进行评价 [J]. 中国管理科学, 2012, (2): 114-120.