承销商与发行人的信息不对称程度测算——基于双边随机前沿模型

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.0535

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文基于双边随机前沿模型对2005-2018年我国新股发行市场上承销商和发行人之间的信息不对称程度进行了实证测算。研究结果表明：承销商和发行人所掌握的信息因素对承销费用率的形成具有重要影响；在承销费用率的议定过程中，承销商具有绝对的信息优势，并使费用率平均增加0.85%；承销商信息优势随新股定价制度改革而增强，这是近些年新股发行费用率不断上升的原因之一；高声誉和无政府关系背景的承销商在信息掌握上具有更多优势。降低企业发行成本需改善承销市场的信息分布，逐步减少对新股定价的过多限制。

关键词: 新股发行, 信息不对称, 双边随机前沿模型

Abstract: The underwriting expense ratio of China's IPO market has been rising in recent years, which is the main cost burden in the listing process. Information asymmetry is the main factor affecting the negotiation of underwriting expense ratio. Therefore, based on the two-tier stochastic frontier model, the degree of information asymmetry between underwriters and issuers in China's IPO market is measured, and then the reasons for the rising underwriting expense rate are explored.
Based on China's IPO data from 2005 to 2018, the estimation results of the two-tier stochastic frontier model show that the information factor between the issuer and the underwriter can explain 76% of the total variance; the information factor has an important impact on the negotiation of the underwriting expense rate. Further analysis of the surplus extracted by issuers and underwriters shows that: (1) the underwriters have an absolute information advantage in the process of fee bargaining, and they can increase the final underwriting expense rate by an average of 0.85% by virtue of their own information advantages. (2) The degree of information asymmetry between underwriters and issuers has been enhanced with the reform of the IPO institution. This is because the dual restrictions on the pricing of new shares and the closing price of the first day make the underwriters' ability and effort not reflected. This enhanced the information advantage of the underwriters. (3) Underwriters with high reputation, no government relationship or background will have stronger information advantages and be more able to raise prices in the negotiation of the underwriting expense rate.
The conclusions of this study have two inspirations: (1) The information asymmetry between underwriters and issuers is one of the main reasons for the rising underwriting rate in China. This information asymmetry mainly comes from the enhancement of information advantage of underwriters. To reduce the cost of listing companies, it is necessary to build a mechanism that can tap the information of underwriters. (2) The regulatory authorities should consider canceling the restriction on the first day closing price of new shares at an appropriate time. The restrictions on the first day return of new shares is the protection of underwriters, which is not conducive to the bargaining position of enterprises in the underwriting market and increases the issuance burden of enterprises.

Key words: IPO, information asymmetry, two-tier stochastic frontier model

中图分类号:

F832.5

谭德凯, 田利辉. 承销商与发行人的信息不对称程度测算——基于双边随机前沿模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(4): 192-201.

TAN De-kai, TIAN Li-hui. Measurement of Information Asymmetry between Underwriters and Issuers——Based on Two-tier Stochastic Frontier Model[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(4): 192-201.

参考文献

[1] Ritter J R, Welch I. A review of IPO activity, pricing, and allocations[J]. Journal of Finance, 2002, 57(4):1795-1828.
[2] 田利辉. 金融管制、投资风险和新股发行的超额抑价[J]. 金融研究,2010,(4):85-100.
[3] 徐光鲁,马超群,刘伟,等. 信息披露与IPO首日回报率[J]. 中国管理科学,2018,26(10):10-19.
[4] Welch I. Seasoned offerings, imitation costs, and the underpricing of initial public offerings[J]. Journal of Finance, 1989, 14(2):421-449.
[5] Rock K. Why new issues are underpriced[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1986, 15(1):187-212.
[6] Baron D P. A model of the demand for investment banking advising and distribution services for new issues[J]. Journal of Finance, 1982, 37(4):955-976.
[7] 张学勇,廖理,罗远航. 券商背景风险投资与公司IPO抑价——基于信息不对称的视角[J]. 中国工业经济,2014,(11):90-101.
[8] 黄张凯,刘津宇,马光荣. 地理位置、高铁与信息:来自中国IPO市场的证据[J]. 世界经济,2016,(10):127-149.
[9] 黄顺武,俞凯,贾捷. 询价制下IPO定价的演化博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学,2018,26(12):78-89.
[10] Aigner D, Lovell K, Schmidt P. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production models[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1977, (6):21-37.
[11] 刘煜辉,沈可挺. 是一级市场抑价,还是二级市场溢价——关于我国新股高抑价的一种检验和一个解释[J]. 金融研究,2011,(11):183-196.
[12] Kumbhakar S C, Parmeter C F. The effects of match uncertainty and bargaining on labor market outcomes:Evidence from firm and worker specific estimates[J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2009, 31(1):1-14.
[13] 卢洪友,连玉君,卢盛峰. 中国医疗服务市场中的信息不对称程度测算[J]. 经济研究,2011,(4):94-106.
[14] 黄顺武,贾捷,汪文隽. 基于双边随机边界模型的IPO抑价分解研究——来自中国创业板的证据[J]. 中国管理科学,2017,25(2):21-29.
[15] 唐齐鸣,陈辉,文守兰. 定价偏差与IPO抑价之谜:基于双边随机前沿模型[J]. 金融学季刊,2018,12(2):22-52.
[16] 刘江会. 我国承销商声誉与承销服务费用关系的研究[J]. 财经研究,2004,30(4):108-118.
[17] 杨记军,赵昌文. 定价机制、承销方式与发行成本:来自中国IPO市场的证据[J]. 金融研究,2006,(5):51-60.
[18] 黄亮华,谢德仁. 核准制下IPO市场寻租研究——基于发审委员和承销商灰色关联视角[J]. 中国工业经济,2016,(3):20-35.
[19] 余峰燕,梁琪. 地方关系承销与市场定价有效性研究——基于承销商独立性视角[J]. 金融研究,2017,(5):143-159.
[20] 郭泓,赵震宇. 承销商声誉对IPO公司定价、初始和长期回报影响实证研究[J]. 管理世界,2006,(3):122-128.
[21] 许荣,蒋庆欣,李星汉. 信息不对称程度增加是否有助于投行声誉功能发挥?——基于中国创业板制度实施的证据[J]. 金融研究,2013,(7):166-179.
[22] Chen Donghua, Guan Yuyan, Zhang Tianyu, et al. Political connection of financial intermediaries:evidence from China's IPO market[J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2017, 76(1):15-31.
[23] Chen Chao, Shi Haina, Xu Haoping. The IPO underwriting market share in China:Do ownership and quality matter?[J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2014, 46(1):177-189.