低碳背景下政府行为及供应链合作研发博弈分析

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.10.007

中国管理科学 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (10): 57-66.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.10.007

低碳背景下政府行为及供应链合作研发博弈分析

张汉江^1,2, 张佳雨^1,2, 赖明勇^1,2,3

1. 湖南大学经济与贸易学院, 湖南长沙 410079;
2. 湖南省物流信息与仿真技术重点实验室, 湖南长沙 410079;
3. 长沙理工大学经济管理学院, 湖南长沙 410114

收稿日期:2014-07-01 修回日期:2015-05-25 出版日期:2015-10-20 发布日期:2015-10-24
作者简介:张汉江(1962-),男(汉族),四川人,湖南大学经济与贸易学院教授,博士,研究方向:物流系统工程、供应链管理、产业组织理论.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金国际合作项目(71420107027);湖南省社科基金课题(2012YBA070)

The Game Analysis of the Supply Chain Cooperative R & D and the Government's Behavior under the Low-carbon Background

ZHANG Han-jiang^1,2, ZHANG Jia-yu^1,2, LAI Ming-yong^1,2,3

1. College of Economics and Trade, Hunan University, Changsha 410079, China;
2. Hunan Province Key Laboratory of logistics information and Simulation Technology, Changsha 410079, China;
3. Economics and Management School of Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha 410114, China

Received:2014-07-01 Revised:2015-05-25 Online:2015-10-20 Published:2015-10-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究了在低碳化背景下,考虑政府征收碳税的纵向供应链最优减排问题。通过建立供应链无减排研发、单独减排研发以及合作减排研发三种模型,采用逆向求解法,首先制造商制定最优减排量,然后供应链参与者决定各自的价格并得到各自的最优利润。通过对均衡结果分析得出,供应链合作研发的最优减排量大于单独研发最优减排量;供应链最优减排量与研发成本系数成负向关系,与分担比例成正向关系。最后用数值分析法证明了,制定合理碳税税率不仅促使最优减排量达到最大值,并且有利于供应链合作减排研发。最后联系实际为政府制定合理碳税税率,以及企业如何实现节能减排供应链协调提出了建议。

关键词: 物流与供应链管理, 低碳减排, 合作研发, 供应链协调, 碳税

Abstract: In the background of low-carbon,study the optimal emission reductions for vertical supply chain with a carbon tax levied by the Government. Through the three models of no reduction of R & D、manufacturer's reduction of R & D alone and cooperation reduction,the converse method is used to solve this problem.By this method,firstly the decision is made by the manufacturer on the optimal emission reductions;then the price of products as set by the supplier and the manufactarer respectively and then their own optimal profits are gained. Through the analysis of equilibrium,It's found that the optimal emission reductions under the supply chain's cooperation R & D is more than that by manufacturer's reduction alone;The optimal emission reductions have a negative relationship with R & D cost coefficient,and a positive relationship with share proportion.At last,a numerical analysis proves that the reasonable carbon tax rates not only maximize the emission reductions, but also is conducive to supply chain's cooperative reductions of R & D.

Key words: logistics and supply chain management, carbon emissions, cooperative research and development, supply chain coordination, carbon tax

中图分类号:

F224.32
F205

张汉江, 张佳雨, 赖明勇. 低碳背景下政府行为及供应链合作研发博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(10): 57-66.

ZHANG Han-jiang, ZHANG Jia-yu, LAI Ming-yong. The Game Analysis of the Supply Chain Cooperative R & D and the Government's Behavior under the Low-carbon Background[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(10): 57-66.

参考文献

[1] Lin Boqiang, Li Xuehui.The effect of carbon tax on per capita CO₂ emissions[J].Energy Policy,2011,39(9):5137-5146.

[2] Conefrey T, Gerald J D F, Valeri L M, et al.The impact of a carbon tax on economic growth and carbon dioxide emissions in Ireland[J]. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management,2013,56(7):934-952.

[3] Allan G, Lecca P, McGregor P, et al. The economic and environmental impact of a carbon tax for Scotland:A computable general equilibrium analysis[J].Ecological Economics,2014,100:40-50.

[4] Lu Chuanyi, Tong Qing, Liu Xuemei.The impacts of carbon tax and complementary policies on Chinese economy[J].Energy Policy,2010,38(11):7278-7285.

[5] 姚昕,刘希颖.基于增长视角的中国最优碳税研究[J].经济研究,2010,(11):48-58.

[6] 朱永彬,刘晓,王铮.碳税政策的减排效果及其对我国经济的影响分析[J].中国软科学,2010,(4):1-10.

[7] Meng S, Siriwardana M, McNeill J.The environmental and economic impact of the carbon tax in Australia[J].Environmental and Resource Economics,2013,54(3):313-332.

[8] Cachon G P.Retail store density and the cost of greenhouse gas emissions[J].Management Science,2013,60(8):1907-1925.

[9] Lukas E, Welling A.Timing and eco(nomic) efficiency of climate-friendly investments in supply chains[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2014,233(2):448-457.

[10] Martina R, de Preuxa L B, Wagner U J.The impact of a carbon tax on manufacturing:Evidence from microdata[J].Public Economics,2014, 117(9):1-14.

[11] 蔡圣华, 牟敦国, 方梦祥.二氧化碳强度减排目标下我国产业结构优化的驱动力研究[J].中国管理科学,2011,19(4):167-173.

[12] 李友东,赵道致,谢鑫鹏.考虑消费者低碳偏好的两级供应链博弈分析[J].内蒙古大学学报,2013,45(5):64-69.

[13] 张毅,夏炎.工业化过程中碳排放消费建设比的演变规律研究[J].中国管理科学,2012,20(2):159-166.

[14] Servaes H.The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value:The role of customer awareness[J].Management Science,2013,59(5):1045-1061.

[15] Benjaafar S,Li Yanzhi,Daskin M.Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains:Insights from simple models[J].Automation Science and Engineering,2013,10(1):99-116.

[16] 赖苹,曹国华,马文斌.基于节能减排技术研发的企业联盟合作模式选择[J].技术经济,2013,32(12):10-14.

[17] Jaber M Y, Glock C H, Saadany AMAE.Supply chain coordination with emissions reduction incentives[J].International Journal of Production Research, 2013,51(1):69-82.

[18] 黄守军,任玉珑,孙睿,等.基于碳减排调度的激励性厂网合作竞价机制设计[J].中国管理科学,2011,19(5):138-146.

[19] Theiben S, Spinler S.Strategic analysis of manufacturer-supplier partnerships:An ANP model for collaborative CO₂ reduction management[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2014,233(2):383-397.

[20] Tsai W H, Yang C H, Chang J C, et al.An activity-based costing decision model for life cycle assessment in green building projects[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2014,238(2):607-619.

[21] 张汉江,孟园,何酉子.公共财政补贴内生化与闭环供应链的短期均衡结果分析[J].系统工程,2013,31(08):55-59.

[22] 张汉江,李聪颖,姚琴,等.闭环供应链上的最优回收激励契约与政府补贴再制造政策的最优化[J].系统工程,2014,32(8):74-79.

低碳背景下政府行为及供应链合作研发博弈分析

The Game Analysis of the Supply Chain Cooperative R & D and the Government's Behavior under the Low-carbon Background

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	曹晓宁, 王永明, 薛方红, 刘晓冰. 供应商保鲜努力的生鲜农产品双渠道供应链协调决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(3): 109-118.
[2]	叶同, 关志民, 张大儒, 曲优. Nash讨价还价公平关切下基于低碳商誉的供应链联合减排与广告的动态优化与协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(3): 119-132.
[3]	刁心薇, 曾珍香, 孙丞. 混合碳政策下两产品供应链的协同研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(2): 149-159.
[4]	刘墨林, 但斌, 马崧萱. 考虑保鲜努力与增值服务的生鲜电商供应链最优决策与协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(8): 76-88.
[5]	刘阳, 田军, 冯耕中, 扈衷权. 基于期权契约的政企联合储备应急物资模型与利润分配机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(8): 162-171.
[6]	张旭梅, 王大飞, 任廷海, 官子力, 但斌. 考虑消费者策略行为的供应链两周期定价与契约设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(7): 132-145.
[7]	王珊珊, 张李浩, 范体军. 基于碳减排技术的竞争供应链投资均衡策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(6): 73-82.
[8]	李巍, 张汉江, 杨柳. 基于市场划分的再制造许可费对定价策略的影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(6): 94-103.
[9]	张玉华, 戴更新, 孙浩, 韩广华, 王磊. 基于信任的供应预测信息共享策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(5): 112-121.
[10]	张云丰, 王勇, 龚本刚, 但斌. 需求受销售价格与变质时间影响的时滞变质品供应链协调研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(3): 142-151.
[11]	扈衷权, 田军, 冯耕中. 基于看跌期权契约的应急物资采购储备模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(2): 69-79.
[12]	代建生. 零售商的资金约束对协调契约的影响分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(10): 98-108.
[13]	王芹鹏. 考虑参考减排努力水平效应的联合减排与竞争动态策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(10): 172-182.
[14]	林晶, 王健, 郑敏. 买方抗衡势力下双渠道促销合作微分博弈研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(9): 80-92.
[15]	王绪金, 马骋. 多层供应链外包模式的选择及其协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(8): 151-161.