中国管理科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (9): 128-139.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.0165cstr: 32146.14.j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.0165
陈金晓1, 陈剑2
收稿日期:2020-02-07
修回日期:2020-05-08
出版日期:2022-09-20
发布日期:2022-09-01
通讯作者:
陈金晓(1983-),男(汉族),浙江台州人,中国社会科学院,博士,研究方向:供应链管理,Email:jincheng0830@126.com.
E-mail:jincheng0830@126.com
基金资助:CHEN Jin-xiao1, CHEN Jian2
Received:2020-02-07
Revised:2020-05-08
Online:2022-09-20
Published:2022-09-01
Contact:
陈金晓
E-mail:jincheng0830@126.com
摘要: 供应链涉及多个利益主体,优化供应链的全局效益需要成员企业的协调来实现。效率评估的非参数法应用广泛,但是单纯的效率优化未考虑资源的可替代性和再分配,忽视了投入(产出)结构调整释放的优化空间。对于效率分解,取折衷或单边最优的方案不完全符合企业追求各自利益最大化的目标。本文针对两级供应链的利润优化问题建立一般化的分析框架,同时考虑了技术进步和资源可替代性的影响,对成员企业的利润博弈展开讨论,探讨了合作博弈如何促成供应链实现集权模式下的最优。通过建立议价模型得出了纳什均衡基础上的成员企业最优利润组合,并给出了实现最优分配方案的中间产品均衡定价。
中图分类号:
陈金晓,陈剑. 供应链的利润博弈与均衡定价[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(9): 128-139.
CHEN Jin-xiao,CHEN Jian. Supply Chain Profit Game and Equilibrium Pricing[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(9): 128-139.
| [1] 陈剑. 低碳供应链管理研究[J]. 系统管理学报, 2012, 21(6): 721-728,735.Chen Jian. Study on supply chain management in a low-carbon era[J]. Journal of Systems & Management, 2012, 21(6): 721-728,735. [2] Kaplan R S, Norton D P. The balanced score card-measures that drive performance[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1992, 1: 71-79. [3] 马士华, 李华焰, 林勇. 平衡记分法在供应链绩效评价中的应用研究[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2002(4): 5-10.Ma Shihua, Li Huayan, Lin Yong. An application research of supply chain performance measurement using balanced scorecard[J]. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2002(4): 5-10. [4] Saaty T L. The analytic hierarchy process[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980. [5] Zadeh L A. Fuzzy sets[J]. Information and Control, 1965, 8(3): 338-353. [6] Buckley J J. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1985, 17(3): 233-247. [7] Zahedi F. The analytic hierarchy process: A survey of the method and its applications[J]. Interfaces, 1986, 16(4): 96-108. [8] Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2(6): 429-444. [9] Seiford L M, Zhu J. Profitability and marketability of the top 55 U.S. commercial banks[J]. Management Science, 1999, 45(9): 1270-1288. [10] Kao C, Hwang S-N. Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 185(1): 418-429. [11] 毕功兵, 梁樑, 杨锋. 两阶段生产系统的DEA效率评价模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2007, 15(2): 92-96.Bi Gongbing, Liang Liang, Yang Feng. A DEA-based efficiency-measuring model for a two-stage production system. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2007, 15(2): 92-96. [12] Liang Liang, Yang Feng, Cook W D, et al. DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2006, 145: 35-49. [13] Chen Yao, Du Juan, Sherman H D, et al. DEA model with shared resources and efficiency decomposition[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 207(1): 339-349. [14] Wu Desheng. BiLevel programming data envelopment analysis with constrained resource[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 207(2): 856-864. [15] 陈凯华, 官建成. 共享投入型关联两阶段生产系统的网络DEA效率测度与分解[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2011, 31(7): 1211-1221.Chen Kaihua, Guan Jiancheng. Network DEA-based efficiency measurement and decomposition for a relational two-stage production system with shared inputs[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2011, 31(7): 1211-1221. [16] Fre R, Grosskopf S. Productivity and intermediate products: A frontier approach[J]. Economics Letters, 1996, 50(1): 65-70. [17] 夏琼, 杨锋, 梁樑, 等. 多阶段混联生产系统的DEA效率评价[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2011, 31(2): 291-296.Xia Qiong, Yang Feng, Liang Liang, et al. DEA efficiency evaluation to multi-stage parallel-series production systems[J]. Systems Engineering — Theory & Practice, 2011, 31(2): 291-296. [18] 韩松, 苏熊. 中国商业银行结构效率研究: 基于复杂网络DEA模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(8): 1-9.Han Song, Su Xiong. Study on structure efficiency of Chinese commercial banking: Basing on complex network DEA model[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(8): 1-9. [19] Chen Yao, Liang Liang, Yang Feng. A DEA game model approach to supply chain efficiency[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2006, 145(1): 5-13. [20] Du Juan, Liang Liang, Chen Yao, et al. A bargaining game model for measuring performance of two-stage network structures[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 210(2): 390-397. [21] Mahmoudi R, Emrouznejad A, Rasti-Barzoki M. A bargaining game model for performance assessment in network DEA considering sub-networks: a real case study in banking[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2019, 31: 6429-6447. [22] 熊曦, 关忠诚, 杨国梁, 等. 嵌套并联结构两阶段DEA下科技创新效率测度与分解[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(3): 206-216.Xiong Xi, Guan Zhongcheng, Yang Guoliang, et al. Measuring S&T efficiency and its decomposition using a two-stage DEA model with nested parallel structure[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(3): 206-216. [23] Debreu G. The coefficient of resource utilization[J]. Econometrica, 1951, 19(3): 273-292. [24] Farrell M J. The measurement of productive efficiency[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 1957, 120(3): 253-290. [25] Fre R, Grosskopf S, Lovell C A K. Measurement of efficiency of production[M]. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing Co., Inc., 1985. [26] Cooper W W, Seiford L M, Tone K. Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software[M]. New York: Springer, 2007. [27] Liang Liang, Cook W D, Zhu J. DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition[J]. Naval Research Logistics, 2008, 55(7): 643-653. [28] Chen Yao, Cook W D, Zhu J. Deriving the DEA frontier for two-stage processes[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 202(1): 138-142. [29] Rubinstein A. Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model[J]. Econometrica, 1982, 50(1): 97-109. |
| [1] | 孙嘉轶, 路阳阳, 滕春贤. 区块链技术对低碳供应链合作策略的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 293-303. |
| [2] | 王莺潼, 计小宇, 孟庆春. 动态不确定环境下基于多层级备份策略的供应链网络性能研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 316-326. |
| [3] | 李梦祺, 李登峰, 南江霞. 考虑链间竞争与链内研发成本共担的绿色供应链决策——基于非合作-合作两型博弈方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 339-349. |
| [4] | 何爽, 赵亮, 张剑, 李琳. 替代竞争情境下关联需求固定产出比联产品加工决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 76-85. |
| [5] | 伏红勇, 雷一峰, 但斌, 掌曙光. 应对供应商减排不合规的碳审计策略:独立vs联合[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(9): 339-348. |
| [6] | 陈威, 田永乐, 白春光, 马永开. 考虑极端天气的电力供应链可再生能源维护策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(9): 359-368. |
| [7] | 吕希琛, 田银凤, 田世海, 刘佳缘, 孔庆伟. MRV机制下碳数据质量监管多主体行为决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(8): 355-368. |
| [8] | 李志文, 徐贤浩, 关旭, 柏庆国, 陈程. 农产品市场双寡头区块链采纳决策的演化博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 324-336. |
| [9] | 孙中苗, 徐琪. 区块链技术下政府对可再生能源电力消纳的动态激励补贴研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 346-359. |
| [10] | 扈衷权, 梁倩, 沈奥, 刘阳. 基于期权契约的应急物资生产能力储备模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(5): 247-258. |
| [11] | 张文明, 杜玉禄. 相邻价格相关的在线单向交易问题的数据驱动型策略设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(5): 26-33. |
| [12] | 何洪阳, 张彬, 田苏俊. 平台经济政企协同治理的演化博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(5): 76-87. |
| [13] | 周驰, 李赫, 于静. 委托代理关系下品牌商网络直播营销激励机制设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(4): 265-274. |
| [14] | 白雨, 赵昕, 丁黎黎. 考虑企业时间偏好的碳配额存储与借贷机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(4): 357-368. |
| [15] | 许书琴, 徐琪. 能源平台供应链可再生能源电力消纳激励契约研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(3): 326-338. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
|
||