隐匿价值、社群学习与知识付费动态定价

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.1447

中国管理科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 244-253.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.1447cstr: 32146.14.j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.1447

隐匿价值、社群学习与知识付费动态定价

刘征驰¹, 马滔^1,2, 叶宇阳¹

1.湖南大学经济与贸易学院，湖南长沙410079；2.清华大学经济管理学院，北京100084

收稿日期:2019-09-23 修回日期:2020-03-11 出版日期:2022-06-20 发布日期:2022-06-24
通讯作者: 马滔(1989-)，男(汉族),湖北荆州人，清华大学经济管理学院，博士后，经济学博士，研究方向:知识付费、数据治理、隐私保护与平台经济，Email：hnu2010matao@hnu.edu.cn. E-mail:hnu2010matao@hnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重大研究计划资助项目(92046004)；国家自然科学基金资助项目(71771081，72071073)；中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2021M701957)

Concealed Value, Community Learning and Dynamic Pricing of Knowledge Payment

LIU Zheng-chi¹, MA Tao^1,2, YE Yu-yang¹

1. College of Economics and Trade,Hunan University,Changsha 410079, China;2. School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Received:2019-09-23 Revised:2020-03-11 Online:2022-06-20 Published:2022-06-24
Contact: 马滔 E-mail:hnu2010matao@hnu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 互联网知识付费中，知识产品价值对供需双方皆具有“隐匿性”。而网络社群作为产品体验信息的重要来源，在知识价值“显现化”过程中发挥着关键作用。基于此，本文将社群交互因素纳入知识付费两期动态定价博弈模型，深入探讨社群学习机制对最优定价策略的影响。模型分析发现：①最优社群价格存在上限阈值，以确保营造良好社群学习氛围。②最优市场价格依赖于知识成本、消费者参与收益和知识价值后验信念，与知识价值之间呈现“非线性”关系。③知识产品一般应采取渗透式定价方式，而消费者耐心程度、社群活跃度与社群交互效率对均衡价格具有重要影响。进一步福利分析表明，互联网社群学习情境将提升提供者收益。本文揭示了互联网知识交易定价的深层逻辑：社群学习引致的“策略效应”和“信息效应”重塑了消费者行为模式，进而倒逼提供者采取适应性动态定价机制。

关键词: 知识付费；隐匿价值；社群学习；动态定价

Abstract: Considering that the value of knowledge is concealed to both the supply and demand sides,it is difficult to price knowledge products. However, the online community can play a key role in the process of appearing knowledge value. The pricing of knowledge products is explored from a new perspective of community learning. The following three key scientific problems are intended to be solved: (1)Considering the change of consumer behavior patternunder community learning environment, how shouldthe provider set community price and market price? (2) What is the impact of community learning on provider pricing strategy? (3) What is the change of provider’s welfare level in the community learning environment?

Key words: knowledge payment; concealed value; community learning; dynamic pricing

中图分类号:

刘征驰,马滔,叶宇阳. 隐匿价值、社群学习与知识付费动态定价[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(6): 244-253.

LIU Zheng-chi,MA Tao,YE Yu-yang. Concealed Value, Community Learning and Dynamic Pricing of Knowledge Payment[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(6): 244-253.

参考文献

［1］ Daft R L, Lengel R H, Trevino L K. Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems［J］. MIS Quarterly, 1987, 11(3):355-366.
［2］ Arrow K. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention［J］. The NationalBureau of Economic Research,1962, 609-626.
［3］周波.知识交易的定价［J］.经济研究,2007, (4):79-89.Zhou Bo.The pricing of knowledge transaction［J］.Economic Research Journal,2007,(4):79-89.
［4］ Boleslavsky R, Cotton C S, Gurnani H. Demonstrations and price competition in new product release［J］. Management Science, 2017,63(6):2016-2026.
［5］ Altug M S, Aydinliyim T. Counteracting strategic purchase deferrals: The impact of online retailers’ return policy decisions［J］. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2016,18(3):376-392.
［6］王夏阳,傅科.企业承诺、消费者选择与产品质量水平的均衡分析［J］.经济研究,2013,(8):94-106.Wang Xiayang, Fu Ke.Commitment，consumer choice and product quality level: An equilibrium analysis based on corporate social responsibility［J］. Economic Research Journal, 2013(8):94-106
［7］ Chen Yubao, Xie Jinhong. Online consumer review: Word-of-Mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix［J］. Management Science, 2008, 54(3):477-491.
［8］苗蕊, 徐健.评分不一致性对在线评论有用性的影响——归因理论的视角［J］. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(5):178-186.Miao Rui, Xu Jian. The impact of rating inconsistency on online review helpfulness: A perspective on attribution theory［J］.Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(5):178-186.
［9］ Yin Dezhi, Bond S D, Zhang Han. Anxious or angry? Effects of discrete emotions on the perceived helpfulness of online reviews［J］. MIS Quarterly, 2014, 38(2): 539-560.
［10］ Forman C, Ghose A, Wiesenfeld B. Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets［J］. Information Systems Research, 2008, 19(3):291-313.
［11］ Wang Shouqiang, Gülru F, zkan S. Signaling product quality through a trial period［J］. Operations Research,2018,63(2):301-312.
［12］ Jiang Yabing, Guo Hong. Design of consumer review systems and product pricing［J］. Information Systems Research,2015,26(4): 714-730.
［13］ Jiang Baojun, Yang Bicheng. Quality and pricing decisions in a market with consumer information sharing［J］. Management Science, 2019, 65(1):272-285.
［14］ Papanastasiou Y, Savva N. Dynamic pricing in the presence of social learning and strategic consumers［J］. Management Science, 2017,63(4):919-939.
［15］ Crapis D, Ifrach B, Maglaras C. Monopoly pricing in the presence of social learning［J］.Management Science,2017,63(11):3586-3608.
［16］杜智涛,徐敬宏.从需求到体验:用户在线知识付费行为的影响因素［J］.新闻与传播研究,2018,25(10):18-39+126.Du Zhitao, Xu Jinghong.From demand to experience: the influencing factors of online knowledge payment behavior.［J］.Journalism & Communication,2018,25(10):18-39+126.
［17］蔡舜,石海荣,傅馨,等.知识付费产品销量影响因素研究:以知乎Live为例［J］.管理工程学报,2019,33(3):71-83.Cai Shun, Shi Hairong, Fu Xin, et al. Paying for knowledge in online community: An exploratory study for Zhihu Live［J］.Chinese Journal of Management,2019,33(3):71-83
［18］韩莹,陈国宏,梁娟.基于网络权力的产业集群二元式创新下知识闭环系统知识定价、收益与协调研究［J］.中国管理科学,2017,25(3):68-75.Han Ying, Chen Guohong, Liang Juan.Knowledge pricing, profits and coordination research on knowledge closed-loop system of industrial cluster ambidextrous innovation based on network power［J］.Chinese Journal of Management Science,2018,62(06):105-115.
［19］刘征驰,马滔,申继禄.个性定制、价值感知与知识付费定价策略［J］.管理学报,2018, 15(12):113-120.Liu Zhengchi, Ma Tao, Shen Jilu.Personality customization, value perception, and knowledge payment pricing strategy［J］.Chinese Journal of Management,2018, 15(12):113-120.
［20］ Ching A T, Erdem T, Keane M P. Learning models: An assessment of progress, challenges and new developments［J］. Marketing Science, 2013, 32(6):913-938.
［21］ Besanko D, Winston W L. Optimal price skimming by a monopolist facing rational consumers［J］. Management Science,1990,36(5):555-567.
［22］ Goes P B, Guo Chenhui, Lin Mingfeng. Do Incentive hierarchies induce user effort? Evidence from an online knowledge exchange［J］. Information Systems Research, 2016，27(3)： 497-516．
［23］ Li Xinxin, Hitt L M. Self-selection and information role of online product reviews［J］. Information Systems Research, 2008, 19(4):456-474.
［24］ Liu Qian, Zhang Dan. Dynamic pricing competition with strategic customers under vertical product differentiation［J］. Management Science, 2013, 59(1):84-101.

[1]	聂慧芳, 朱建军. 考虑情绪演化下突发事件所致舆情危机的两阶段响应决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 112-125.
[2]	张恒杰, 刘娟, 朱文凤, 董玉成. 基于最小成本反向图模型的双渠道供应链碳减排冲突研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 212-224.
[3]	曹端阳, 张旭梅, 但斌. 考虑订单可拆分的第三方共享制造平台产能匹配策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 225-235.
[4]	景熠, 刘威, 刘芹芹, 程凤娇, 张华荣. 突发事件冲击下应对供应中断的供应链响应计划研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 57-66.
[5]	张发明, 韩江涛, 张淋茜, 朱姝琪. 社会信任网络下基于T₂PLD算子的多属性大群体决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(9): 177-188.
[6]	冯宇, 党耀国, 王俊杰, 杨章程. 基于2-可加Choquet积分的混合信息灰关联决策方法及其应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(9): 189-200.
[7]	李聪聪, 梁海明, 董玉成. 多粒度语言环境下基于持续学习和行为建模的个性化语义共识决策模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(9): 201-212.
[8]	饶卫振, 常悦, 刘鹏. 新能源汽车动力电池协作回收模式及运营方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(9): 325-338.
[9]	田宝峰, 张静文, 李鲁波, 陈俊杰. 存储空间受限下资源约束型项目调度与材料采购集成优化[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(8): 144-155.
[10]	戢守峰, 刘红玉, 王丽洁, 戢媛媛. PI环境下考虑保鲜努力的冷链产品生产-库存-运输联合优化模型与求解[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(8): 166-176.
[11]	邵建芳, 樊彧, 王熹徽, 梁樑. 应急物资分配数量差异与人口统计学因素对灾民公平感知的影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(8): 189-197.
[12]	崔晓, 何正文, 王能民. 考虑信息处理投入的随机资源需求反应性项目调度优化[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(8): 218-229.
[13]	毛照昉, 袁锐莹, 张清然. 考虑捆绑销售的在线课程免费试听策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(8): 238-249.
[14]	景熠, 张闻秋, 曹柳. 电商购物平台与回收平台的“以旧换新”合作策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(8): 289-297.
[15]	代业明, 于双. 碳税政策下考虑零售商双重行为偏好的再制造闭环供应链决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(8): 308-320.

隐匿价值、社群学习与知识付费动态定价

Concealed Value, Community Learning and Dynamic Pricing of Knowledge Payment

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0