突发事件下的医院应急群决策模型研究*

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.0537

中国管理科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 254-262.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.0537cstr: 32146.14.j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.0537

突发事件下的医院应急群决策模型研究*

万志远, 刘勤明, 叶春明, 刘文溢

上海理工大学管理学院，上海200093

收稿日期:2019-04-16 修回日期:2020-01-21 出版日期:2022-06-20 发布日期:2022-06-24
通讯作者: 刘勤明(1984-)，男(汉族)，山东日照人，上海理工大学管理学院，副教授，博士，研究方向：维护调度、人工智能等，Email：lqm0531@163.com. E-mail:lqm0531@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71840003，71632008)；教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金资助项目(20YJAZH068)；上海理工大学科技发展项目(2020KJFZ038)

Research on Hospital Emergency Group Decision Model under Unexpected Events

WAN Zhi-yuan, LIU Qin-ming, YE Chun-ming, LIU Wen-yi

Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China

Received:2019-04-16 Revised:2020-01-21 Online:2022-06-20 Published:2022-06-24
Contact: 刘勤明 E-mail:lqm0531@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对突发事件下的医院应急管理问题，进行了医院应急群决策模型研究。考虑到医院应急决策者心理行为特征的偏向性，将病人应急方案的选择设计成一个以医院决策者信息与病人集结信息之间距离最小为目标的非线性规划模型。根据病人的伤重程度和应急资源使用度的损益值，获得医院应急情景下的综合价值，根据累积前景理论，通过计算区间概率，获得医院应急情景下不同应急方式的累积前景值。使用模拟植物生长算法求解，莸得病人的最优集结信息。案例分析表明，该决策过程可以使得突发事件下医院应急管理方案达到最优。

关键词: 突发事件；应急群决策；心理行为；累积前景理论；模拟植物生长算法

Abstract: Hospital emergency management in emergencies is becoming increasingly important. Aiming at the risk of emergencies and the uncertainty of context evolution, the psychological behavior characteristics of hospital emergency decision makers are considered in the process of decision analysis. A hospital emergency decision model based on cumulative outlook theory is proposed in this paper.

Key words: emergencies; emergency group decision-making; psychological behavior; cumulative prospect theory; simulated plant growth algorithm

中图分类号:

C934

万志远,刘勤明,叶春明, 等. 突发事件下的医院应急群决策模型研究*[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(6): 254-262.

WAN Zhi-yuan,LIU Qin-ming,YE Chun-ming, et al. Research on Hospital Emergency Group Decision Model under Unexpected Events[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(6): 254-262.

参考文献

［1］孙华丽, 赵喆, 刘涛, 等. 震后应急医疗救援流程效率评价研究［J］. 中国管理科学, 2019,21(1):205-216.Sun Huali, Zhao Zhe, Liu Tao,et al.Study on the efficiency evaluation of emergency medical rescue process after the earthquake［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science,2019,21(1):205-216.
［2］杨继君,曾子轩,佘廉.基于多属性效用匹配的应急案例检索方法研究［J］. 计算机应用研究, 2018(2):386-390.Yang Jijun,Zeng Zixuan,She Lian.Research on emergency case retrieval method based on multi-attribute utility matching［J］.Application Research of Computers,2018(2):386-390.
［3］ Fan Zhiping, Li Yonghai, Zhang Yao. Generating project risk response strategies based on CBR: A case study［J］. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, 42(6): 2870-2883.
［4］ Zook M, Graham M, Shelton T, et al. Volunteered geographic information and crowdsourcing disaster relief: A case study of the haitian earthquake［J］. World Medical Health Policy, 2010, 2(2): 7-33.
［5］ Gao Huiji, Barbier G, Goolsby R, et al. Harnessing the crowdsourcing power of social media for disaster relief［J］.IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2011, 26(3): 10-14.
［6］ Han B, Zank H. Additive utility in prospect theory［J］.Management Science, 2009, 55(5): 863-873.
［7］ Hu Junhua, Liu Yang. Dynamic stochastic multi-criteria decision making method based on cumulative prospect theory and set pair analysis［J］. Systems Engineering Procedia, 2011,1(1): 432-439.
［8］ Schmidt U, Zank H. Risk aversion in cumulative prospect theory［J］. General Information, 2002, 54(1): 208-216.
［9］张晓, 樊治平.基于前景随机占优的多属性多标度大群体决策方法［J］.控制与决策, 2014, 29(8): 1429-1433.Zhang Xiao,Fan Zhiping.Multi-attribute multi-scale large group decision-making method based on foreground random dominance［J］.Control and Decision, 2014, 29(8): 1429-1433.
［10］ Liu Yang, Fan Zhiping, Zhang Yuo. Risk decision analysis in emergency response: A method based on cumulative prospect theory［J］. Computers & Operations Research,2014, 42(2): 75-82.
［11］ Wang Liang, Zhang Zixin, Wang Yingming. A prospect theory-based interval dynamic reference point method for emergency decision making［J］. Expert Systems with Applications.2015,42(23):9379-9388.
［12］ Jou R C, Chen Kehong. An application of cumulative prospect theory to freeway drivers route choice behaviours［J］.Transportation Research Part A Policy & Practice, 2013,49(3): 123-131.
［13］ Bocquého G, Jacquet F, Reynaud A. Expected utility or prospect theory maximisers Assessing farmers’ risk behaviour from field-experiment data［J］. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 2014, 41(1): 135-172.
［14］ Shi Yun, Cui Xiangyu, Li Duan. Discrete-time behavioral portfolio selection under cumulative prospect theory［J］. J of Economic Dynamics & Control, 2015, 61(12): 283-302.
［15］李海涛, 罗党,孙德才.多元不确定偏好下灰色局势群体应急决策方法［J］. 中国安全科学学报.2017(12):140-146.Li Haitao, Luo Dang, Sun Decai. Emergency decision-making method for gray situation group under multiple uncertain preferences［J］. Chinese Safety Science Journal.2017(12):140-146.
［16］周晓辉, 姚俭, 吴天魁. 基于梯形直觉模糊数的 TOPSIS 多属性决策方法［J］. 上海理工大学学报, 2014(3):281-286.Zhou Xiaohui, Yao Jian, Wu Tiankui. TOPSIS multi-attribute decision-making method based on trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers［J］. Journal of University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 2014(3):281-286.
［17］王治莹,李勇建.行为决策对突发事件的干预机制及其预案启动策略研究［J］.系统工程理论与实践,2015,35(7):1863-1870.Wang Zhiying,Li Yongjian.Study on the intervention mechanism of behavioral decision-making for emergencies and the initiation strategy of emergency plans［J］.System Engineering Theory and Practice,2015,35(7):1863-1870.
［18］程铁军,吴凤平,李锦波.基于累积前景理论的不完全信息下应急风险决策模型［J］.系统工程,2014,32(4):70-75.Cheng Tiejun,Wu Fengping,Li Jinbo.An emergency risk decision-making model with incomplete information based on cumulative prospect theory［J］.Systems Engineering,2014,32(4):70-75.
［19］王佳, 金秀, 王旭, 等. 基于前景理论的跨市场状态转移多阶段资产配置研究［J］. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(12):44-55.Wang Jia, Jin Xiu, Wang Xu, et al. Research on multi-Phase asset allocation of cross-market state transfer based on prospect theory［J］. China Management Science, 2018, 26(12):44-55.
［20］ Tversky A, Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty［J］. J of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992, 5(4): 297-323.
［21］谭秋月, 孙平安. 基于联系数复运算的区间数型基坑支护方案评价向量投影模型及其应用［J］. 数学的实践与认识，2019, 49(18):245-255.Tan Qiuyue, Sun Pingan. Interval number type foundation pit support scheme evaluation vector projection model based on connection number complex operation and its application［J］. Mathematics in Practice and Knowledge, 2019, 49(18):245-255.
［22］李彤, 王春峰, 王文波,等. 求解整数规划的一种仿生类全局优化算法一模拟植物生长算法［J］.系统工程理论与实践，2005，25(7):76-85.Li Tong, Wang Chunfeng, Wang Wenbo, et al. A bionic global optimization algorithm for solving integer programming-simulating plant growth algorithm［J］. System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2005, 25(7): 76-85.

[1]	聂慧芳, 朱建军. 考虑情绪演化下突发事件所致舆情危机的两阶段响应决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 112-125.
[2]	张恒杰, 刘娟, 朱文凤, 董玉成. 基于最小成本反向图模型的双渠道供应链碳减排冲突研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 212-224.
[3]	景熠, 刘威, 刘芹芹, 程凤娇, 张华荣. 突发事件冲击下应对供应中断的供应链响应计划研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 57-66.
[4]	张发明, 韩江涛, 张淋茜, 朱姝琪. 社会信任网络下基于T₂PLD算子的多属性大群体决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(9): 177-188.
[5]	李聪聪, 梁海明, 董玉成. 多粒度语言环境下基于持续学习和行为建模的个性化语义共识决策模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(9): 201-212.
[6]	景熠, 张闻秋, 曹柳. 电商购物平台与回收平台的“以旧换新”合作策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(8): 289-297.
[7]	代业明, 于双. 碳税政策下考虑零售商双重行为偏好的再制造闭环供应链决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(8): 308-320.
[8]	张侃, 刘思施, 魏华, 余鹏, 梁新. 基于CPSO改进的TOPSIS三维空间组合定权投影动态综合评价研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 117-127.
[9]	董乾坤, 易平涛, 李伟伟, 王露. 基于多源混合评价信息的随机聚合指数及应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 128-138.
[10]	李进, 江赫奇, 丁圣琪, 张海霞, 伍蓓. 碳交易机制下竞争型供应链最优减排与规制政策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 360-368.
[11]	缑迅杰, 徐鑫茹, 徐泽水. 基于动态社会网络的能源转型路径评估多属性群决策建模研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(6): 346-359.
[12]	罗世华, 刘俊. 拓展区间Fermatean模糊前景理论综合评价方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(6): 129-139.
[13]	张磊, 韩可可, 叶鑫. 广义Z-numbers证据下考虑专家影响力和评价值一致性的应急决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(6): 160-170.
[14]	常志朋, 王治莹, 陈闻鹤. 基于模糊影响图和前景理论的重大疫情防控策略决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(6): 171-181.
[15]	赵程伟, 徐选华, 刘瑞环, 何继善. 模糊异构环境下考虑双重交互及不完全理性心理的多属性群决策及应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(6): 182-195.

突发事件下的医院应急群决策模型研究*

Research on Hospital Emergency Group Decision Model under Unexpected Events

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0