中国管理科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 155-166.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.0165cstr: 32146.14.j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.0165
王一雷1, 夏西强2, 张言3
收稿日期:2021-01-23
修回日期:2021-03-23
出版日期:2022-04-20
发布日期:2022-04-26
通讯作者:
夏西强(1984-),男(汉族),河南周口人,郑州大学商学院,教授,博士,研究方向:绿色供应链、再制造管理、博弈论,Email:xqxia@zzu.edu.cn.
E-mail:xqxia@zzu.edu.cn
基金资助:WANG Yi-lei1, XIA Xi-qiang2, ZHANG Yan3
Received:2021-01-23
Revised:2021-03-23
Online:2022-04-20
Published:2022-04-26
Contact:
夏西强
E-mail:xqxia@zzu.edu.cn
摘要: 为分析不同类型的碳交易政策对供应链中企业运营产生的长期影响,在考虑产品商誉能够影响消费者需求且具有动态变化过程的基础上,构建了供应链中制造商和零售商的三种微分博弈模型。研究结果表明:与没有碳交易相比,基于企业碳排放历史数据的碳交易政策的实施能够从长期角度提升制造商产品的碳减排水平和零售商的低碳宣传水平,同时产品最终的商誉和零售商的利润也有所增长;此外,基于产品碳排放数据的碳交易政策的实施能够进一步提升产品的碳减排水平、商誉和零售商利润,而零售商的低碳宣传水平保持不变;当政府的政策满足特定条件时,基于产品碳排放数据的碳交易政策对制造商更有利。
中图分类号:
WANG Yi-lei,XIA Xi-qiang,ZHANG Yan. 碳交易政策下供应链碳减排与低碳宣传的微分对策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(4): 155-166.
王一雷,夏西强,张言. Differential Strategies of Carbon Emission Reduction and Low-carbon Promotion of the Supply Chain under Cap-and-trade Policy[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(4): 155-166.
| [1] 李友东, 夏良杰, 王锋正. 基于产品替代的低碳供应链博弈与协调模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(10): 66-76.Li Youdong, Xia Liangjie, Wang Fengzheng. Game and coordination model for low-carbon supply chain with product substitution[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(10): 66-76. [2] 夏良杰, 孔清逸, 李友东, 等. 考虑交叉持股的低碳供应链减排与定价决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(4): 70-81.Xia Liangjie, Kong Qingyi, Li Youdong, et al. Emission reduction and pricing strategies of a low-carbon supply chain considering cross-shareholding[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(4): 70-81. [3] Xia Liangjie, Guo Tingting, Qin Juanjuan, et al. Carbon emission reduction and pricing policies of a supply chain considering reciprocal preferences in cap-and-trade system[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2018, 268: 149-175. [4] Benjaafar S, Li Yanzhi, Daskin M. Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: Insights from simple models[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2013, 10(1):99-116. [5] 李友东, 谢鑫鹏, 王锋正, 等. 考虑碳配额和交易的排放依赖型供应链低碳化运营决策[J]. 控制与决策, 2020, 35(9): 2236-2244.Li Youdong, Xie Xinpeng, Wang Fengzheng, et al. Emission-dependent supply chain low-carbonization based behavior of enterprise operation decision under cap-and-trade environment[J]. Control and Decision, 2020, 35(9): 2236-2244. [6] 夏良杰, 柳慧, 张萌, 等. 强制减排规制下基于碳减排利润增量分享契约的供应链协调研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(5): 92-107.Xia Liangjie, Liu Hui, Zhang Meng, et al. Supply chain coordination based on incremental profit sharing contract of carbon emission reduction under mandatory carbon emissions capacity scheme[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019, 28(5): 92-107. [7] 郭军华, 孙林洋, 张诚, 等. 碳限额交易政策下考虑消费者低碳偏好的供应链定价与协调[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2020, 25(2): 134-145.Guo Junhua, Sun Linyang, Zhang Cheng, et al. Pricing and coordinating of supply chains considering the low-carbon preference of consumers under cap-and-trade mechanism[J]. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2020, 25(2): 134-145. [8] 杨磊, 张琴, 张智勇. 碳交易机制下供应链渠道选择与减排策略[J]. 管理科学学报, 2017, 20(11): 75-87.Yang Lei, Zhang Qin, Zhang Zhiyong. Channel selection and carbon emissions reduction policies in supply chains with the cap-and-trade scheme[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2017, 20(11): 75-87. [9] 夏良杰, 白永万, 秦娟娟, 等. 碳交易规制下信息不对称供应链的减排和低碳推广博弈研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(6): 37-45.Xia Liangjie, Bai Yongwan, Qin Juanjuan, et al. Supply chain’s emission reduction and low carbon promotion policies in cap-and-trade system: The view of information asymmetry[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2018, 27(6): 37-45. [10] 李新军, 陈美娜, 达庆利. 碳交易视角下政府管制的汽车制造企业闭环供应链优化决策[J]. 管理评论, 2020, 32(5): 269-279.Li Xinjun, Chen Meina, Da Qingli. Optimization decision of government-driving closed-loop supply chain for automobile manufacturers from the perspective of carbon trading[J]. Management Review, 2020, 32(5): 269-279. [11] Ma Xin, Ho W, Ji Ping, et al. Contract design with information asymmetry in a supply chain under an emissions trading mechanism[J]. Decision Sciences, 2018, 49(1): 121-153. [12] Dong Ciwei, Shen Bin, Chow P S, et al. Sustainability investment under cap-and-trade regulation[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2016, 240: 509-531. [13] Cao Erbao, Yu Man. The bright side of carbon emission permits on supply chain financing and performance[J]. Omega, 2019, 88: 24-39. [14] Tang Ruihong, Yang Lei. Impacts of financing mechanism and power structure on supply chains under cap-and-trade regulation[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2020, 139: 101957. [15] Du Shaofu, Zhu Lili, Liang Liang, et al. Emission-dependent supply chain and environment-policy-making in the ‘cap-and-trade’ system[J]. Energy Policy, 2013, 57: 61-67. [16] 徐春秋, 赵道致,原白云, 等. 上下游联合减排与低碳宣传的微分博弈模型[J]. 管理科学学报, 2016, 19(2): 53-65.Xu Chunqiu, Zhao Daozhi, Yuan Baiyun, et al. Differential game model on joint carbon emission reduction and low-carbon promotion in supply chains[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2016, 19(2): 53-65. [17] 赵道致,原白云, 徐春秋. 低碳环境下供应链纵向减排合作的动态协调策略[J]. 管理工程学报, 2016, 30(1): 147-154.Zhao Daozhi, Yuan Baiyun, Xu Chunqiu. Dynamic coordination strategy of vertical cooperative on carbon emission reduction in supply chain under low-carbon era[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2016, 30(1): 147-154. [18] 刘名武, 万谧宇, 付红. 碳交易和低碳偏好下供应链低碳技术选择研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(1): 152-162.Liu Mingwu, Wan Miyu, Fu Hong. Low-carbon technology for supply chain under cap and trade mechanism with low-carbon preference[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(1): 152-162. [19] 徐春秋, 王芹鹏. 考虑政府参与方式的供应链低碳商誉微分博弈模型[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(8): 35-44.Xu Chunqiu, Wang Qinpeng. Differential game models of low carbon reputation considering government participation in supply chain[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(8): 35-44. [20] 叶同, 关志民, 陈大宇. 碳政策下考虑异质消费者的供应链动态优化[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2018, 23(1): 14-22.Ye Tong, Guan Zhimin, Chen Dayu. Dynamic optimization of supply chain under carbon policy considering consumer heterogeneity[J]. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2018, 23(1): 14-22. [21] Zhou Yanju, Ye Xin. Differential game model of joint emission reduction strategies and contract design in a dual-channel supply chain[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 190: 592-607. [22] Xia Xiqiang, Ruan Junhu, Juan Zhiru, et al. Upstream-downstream joint carbon reduction strategies based on low-carbon promotion[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018, 15(7): 1351. [23] Zu Yafei, Chen Lianghua, Fan Yi. Research on low-carbon strategies in supply chain with environmental regulations based on differential game[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 177: 527-546. [24] Giovanni P D. Quality improvement vs. advertising support: Which strategy works better for a manufacturer?[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 208(2): 119-130. [25] He Xiuli, Prasad A, Sethi S P. Cooperative advertising and pricing in a dynamic stochastic supply chain: Feedback Stackelberg strategies[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2009, 18(1): 78-94. [26] Bryson A E, 何硫琦. 应用最优控制—最优化·估计·控制[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 1982.Bryson A E,He Liuqi.Applied optimal control— optimization, estimation,and control[M].Beijing:National Defense Industry Press,1982. [27] Sadegheih A. Optimal design methodologies under the carbon emission trading program using MIP, GA, SA, and TS[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, 15 (1), 504-513. [28] 赵黎明, 李聪, 郭祥. 基于微分博弈的政企救灾合作策略研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38(4): 885-898.Zhao Liming, Li Cong, Guo Xiang. Research of cooperative relief strategy between government and enterprise based on differential game[J]. System Engineering-Theory and Practice, 2018, 38(4): 885-898. [29] Xia Xiqiang, Li Chengyu, Zhu Qinghua. Game analysis for the impact of carbon trading on low-carbon supply chain[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 276:123220. |
| [1] | 刘琦铀, 陈嘉, 张成科, 朱怀念. 联邦学习与区块链赋能下的应收账款拍卖融资机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(6): 13-21. |
| [2] | 张晓青, 苑希港, 陈佳佳, 魏强, 霍宝锋. 考虑消费者隐私顾虑的消费品以旧换新定价策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(6): 291-302. |
| [3] | 常建红, 宋鹏, 吴丽荣. 数据交易驱动下在线商家产品个性化定价研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(6): 36-49. |
| [4] | 赵世杰, 荣雪娇, 高雷阜. 耦合行为运作下考虑供需关系的订购行为决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(6): 303-318. |
| [5] | 王成付, 陈祥锋, 金伟, 丁雯. 区块链智能合约驱动下动态利率定价的订单融资与供应链运营策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(6): 319-330. |
| [6] | 赵玉, 郑本荣, 金亮. 转售、代销还是混合模式?竞争性电商平台销售模式选择[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(6): 331-343. |
| [7] | 申笑宇, 代莉. 绿色产品“上链”决策与销售模式协同研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(6): 344-355. |
| [8] | 公彦德, 开吉, 王哲. 考虑公平偏好和绿色创新的绿色供应链策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(5): 310-321. |
| [9] | 孙华丽, 马晨欣, 张俊鸽. 供应中断风险下考虑低息贷款和营业中断保险的应对策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(5): 342-350. |
| [10] | 仝鹏, 丁翔, 王文宾, 毛展鹏, 肖莹. 碳交易机制下考虑零售商信息分享策略的供应链决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(4): 287-297. |
| [11] | 林帅成, 张桂涛. “双积分”政策下考虑新能源汽车续航和广告宣传的微分策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(4): 319-329. |
| [12] | 李涛, 赵俊, 刘洋, 刘斌. 考虑零售商“虚拟合作”的竞争性供应链定价策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(3): 275-285. |
| [13] | 邹宗保, 陈力豪, 梁强, 周少锐. 集中还是分离:车电运营策略对竞争对手电池供应商选择的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(3): 309-319. |
| [14] | 戴道明, 王忆都. 可再生能源消纳责任权重制下光伏供应链合作与运营决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(3): 320-332. |
| [15] | 牟进进, 王淑云. 跨境电商供应链物流增值服务的优化决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(2): 298-308. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
|
||