主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 228-238.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2024.1927cstr: 32146.14.j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2024.1927

• • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑司机福利的网约车平台定价策略研究

姜依依1, 胡晨2, 肖勇波1(), 王淑纳3   

  1. 1.清华大学经济管理学院,北京 100084
    2.西交利物浦大学西浦国际商学院,江苏 苏州 215123
    3.菏泽学院商学院,山东 菏泽 274015
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-25 修回日期:2025-03-18 出版日期:2026-06-25 发布日期:2026-05-22
  • 通讯作者: 肖勇波 E-mail:xiaoyb@sem.tsinghua.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(72125002);国家自然科学基金项目(72293561);国家自然科学基金项目(72502190);国家自然科学基金项目(72542004);山东省社科规划项目(25CSDJ32)

Pricing Strategy of a Ride-hailing Platform with Concern on Driver Welfare

Yiyi Jiang1, Chen Hu2, Yongbo Xiao1(), Shuna Wang3   

  1. 1.School of Economics and Management,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China
    2.International Business School,Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University,Jiangsu 215123,China
    3.School of Business,Heze University,Heze 274015,China
  • Received:2024-10-25 Revised:2025-03-18 Online:2026-06-25 Published:2026-05-22
  • Contact: Yongbo Xiao E-mail:xiaoyb@sem.tsinghua.edu.cn

摘要:

网约车平台的快速发展在提升出行效率和创造就业机会的同时,也引发了社会各界对司机福利问题的高度关注。本文以考虑司机福利的单一网约车平台为研究对象,构建了一个包含供需匹配、服务定价和工资决策的双边平台模型。通过分析双边定价、固定分成和最低工资三种定价策略,考察了平台对司机福利的关注程度如何影响其最优定价决策、利润水平以及司机和乘客的福利状况。研究结果表明:双边定价策略下,平台能实现供需的完美匹配;随着对司机福利关注程度的提升,平台往往通过直接提高单位工资水平来改善司机福利。而在固定分成和最低工资策略下,市场可能会出现供给过剩的均衡状态;对司机福利的关注程度提升时,平台可能会选择降低服务价格以提高司机的接单概率,间接提升司机收入。值得注意的是,无论采用何种定价策略,随着平台对司机福利重视程度的提升,其定价调整不仅直接改善司机福利,还能间接提高乘客福利。此外,平台可以通过承担较小的利润损失来显著提升司机福利,有利于总福利的改善。本研究为实现平台盈利性与社会责任之间的平衡提供了一条有效途径,也为相关政策制定者提供了有价值的参考。

关键词: 平台经济, 定价策略, 社会责任, 司机福利

Abstract:

The proliferation of ride-hailing platforms has transformed urban mobility by offering convenient travel solutions and generating widespread employment opportunities. As the industry evolves, the focus is gradually shifting toward sustainable development, with driver welfare emerging as a critical concern. An increasing number of platforms recognize that prioritizing driver welfare is not only a matter of corporate social responsibility but also essential for their long-term sustainable development. While prior research has examined the social responsibilities of ride-hailing platforms, there is a lack of studies investigating the platform’s optimal operational decisions when driver welfare is explicitly considered, as well as the impact of such considerations on market equilibrium. This gap is addressed by studying the optimal decisions of a socially responsible ride-hailing platform that operates with a mixed objective: maximizing profit while enhancing driver welfare. The platform determines both the wage paid to drivers and the fare charged to passengers, and it facilitates the matching of available drivers with passenger ride requests. Three widely used pricing strategies are examined: (i) two-sided pricing, where the platform determines the passenger fare and driver wage separately; (ii) fixed commission, where the platform pays drivers a fixed percentage of the fare; and (iii) minimum wage, where drivers receive guaranteed minimum earnings. By studying the platform’s optimal pricing and wage decisions under each strategy, how different levels of concern for driver welfare influence the platform’s decisions and market outcomes is analyzed, including platform profit, driver welfare, and passenger welfare. Using the two-sided pricing strategy as a benchmark, a comparative analysis of the fixed commission and minimum wage strategies is conducted through numerical experiments. The analysis yields several important results. Under the two-sided pricing strategy, the platform can achieve a perfect matching between supply and demand. When driver welfare becomes a higher priority, the platform tends to respond by increasing per-trip wages, thereby directly improving driver earnings. Under either the fixed commission or minimum wage strategies, there may be an oversupply equilibrium in the market. When the emphasis on driver welfare increases, the platform might reduce service prices to boost driver utilization rates, thereby indirectly enhancing drivers’ expected earnings. Importantly, across all pricing strategies, a higher emphasis on driver welfare not only leads to improvements in driver welfare, but also increases passenger welfare. Moreover, platforms can achieve substantial improvements in driver welfare with only marginal reductions in profit. Valuable insights into how ride-hailing platforms can balance profitability and social responsibility are provided. The findings can also inform policymakers in designing regulations that promote both the financial sustainability of ride-hailing platforms and drivers’ well-being.

Key words: platform economy, pricing strategies, corporate social responsibility, driver welfare

中图分类号: