研发项目投资决策与最优政府补贴研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.0896

中国管理科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 63-72.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.0896

研发项目投资决策与最优政府补贴研究

甘柳¹, 李群翅²

1.闽江学院新华都商学院，福建福州350108； 2.江西财经大学金融学院，江西南昌330013

收稿日期:2020-05-17 修回日期:2020-07-03 出版日期:2023-02-20 发布日期:2023-02-28
通讯作者: 甘柳(1983-)，男(汉族)，湖南汨罗人，闽江学院新华都商学院，教师，博士，研究方向：金融工程，Email：ganliu2016@163.com. E-mail:ganliu2016@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(72161016，71661008)

Research on R&D Project Investment Decision and Optimal Government Subsidies

GAN Liu¹, LI Qun-chi²

1. Newhuadu Business School, Minjiang University, Fuzhou 350108, China;2. School of Finance, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China

Received:2020-05-17 Revised:2020-07-03 Online:2023-02-20 Published:2023-02-28
Contact: 甘柳 E-mail:ganliu2016@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 补贴是政府支持企业创新的重要方式之一。在政府采取研发项目资金补贴策略的基础上，构建政府和企业家双方博弈的不确定性投资与融资模型，并给出博弈均衡下最优投资时机、投资成本、融资策略以及最优政府补贴的显式表达式。研究发现企业家的债务协商能力会影响到政府对企业的补贴策略，只有当企业家在债务市场拥有一定议价能力的时候，政府补贴才能有效缓解研发项目的投资不足问题。另外，随着企业收益流的不确定性的增加，均衡下政府补贴出现先增后减的趋势，政府应尽可能根据不同风险的研发项目来采取补贴策略。本文的结论从理论上丰富了已有研发补贴政策的研究，为政府更有针对性实施补贴政策提供有益参考。

关键词: 研发项目；不确定性投资；协商；融资决策；研发补贴

Abstract: One of the key strategic decisions in firms concerns the timing and financing of an investment. However, bonds are not the only source of financing key strategic investments. Government subsidy is an important source of financing. The government uses the subsidy to help the R&D enterprises to solve the problems of insufficient investment. According to a recent report by National Bureau of Statistics. The total expenditure on R&D activities in China was 2,173.7 billion yuan in 2019, with an average annual growth rate of 10.73% from 2015 to 2019. Among them, the total expenditure on R&D activities by companies in 2019 can account for about 79%, and the government accounts for 21%. The state’s financial science and technology funds are increasing year by year at an average annual rate of 12.9%.

Key words: R&D project; uncertain investment; negotiation; financing; government subsidies

中图分类号:

F830

甘柳, 李群翅. 研发项目投资决策与最优政府补贴研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(2): 63-72.

GAN Liu, LI Qun-chi. Research on R&D Project Investment Decision and Optimal Government Subsidies[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(2): 63-72.

参考文献

［1］肖文, 林高榜. 政府支持、研发管理与技术创新效率——基于中国工业行业的实证分析［J］. 管理世界, 2014, 247(4):71-80.Xiao Wen, Lin Gaobang. Government support, R&D management and technological innovation efficiency—an empirical analysis based on Chinese industrial sectors［J］. Journal of Management World, 2014, 274(4):71-80.
［2］ Geske R. The valuation of compound options［J］. Journal of Financial Economics, 1979, 7(1): 63-81.
［3］ Dixit A K, Pindyck R S. Investment under uncertainty［M］. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press, 1994.
［4］ Geske R, Subrahmanyam A, Zhou Y. Capital structure effects on the prices of equity call options ［J］. Journal of Financial Economics, 2016, 121(2): 231-253.
［5］ Perlitz M, Peske T, Schrank R. Real options valuation: the new frontier in R&D project evaluation?［J］. R&D Management, 1999, 29(3): 255-270.
［6］ Martin S. Spillovers, appropriability, and R&D［J］. Journal of Economics, 2002，75（1）: 1-32.
［7］ Martzoukos S H, Zacharias, E. Real option games with R&D and learning spillovers［J］. Omega, 2013, 41(2): 236-249.
［8］宋之杰, 孙其龙. 技术创新型企业研发投资的三阶段博弈——基于吸收能力的观点［J］. 管理工程学报, 2009, 23(1): 112-115+138.Song Zhijie, Sun Qilong. Three stage game of technical innovation firms—based on the conception of absorptive capacity［J］. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2009, 23(1): 112-115+138.
［9］王超发, 孙静春. 基于决策者认知水平和完全信息竞争博弈的R&D项目投资决策研究［J］. 管理工程学报, 2019, 33(4): 136-143.Wang Chaofa, Sun Jingchun. The investment decisions of the R&D project based on the policymakers’ cognitive level and completely information competition game［J］. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2019, 33(4): 136-143.
［10］ Pennings E. Taxes and stimuli of investment under uncertainty［J］. European Economic Review, 2000, 44 (2): 383-391.
［11］ Sarkar S. Attracting private investment: tax reduction, investment subsidy, or both?［J］. Economic Modelling, 2012, 29 (5): 1780-1785.
［12］ Scandizzo P L, Ventura M. Sharing risk through concessi on contracts［J］. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 207 (1): 363-370.
［13］ Sarkar S. Can tax convexity be ignored in corporate financing decisions?［J］. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2008, 32 (7): 1310-1321.
［14］ Armada M J, Pereira P J, Rodrigues, A. Optimal subsidies and guarantees in public—private partnerships［J］. The European Journal of Finance, 2012, 18 (5): 469-495.
［15］ Danielova A, Sarkar S. The effect of leverage on the tax-cut versus in-vestment-subsidy argument［J］. Review of Financial Economics, 2011, 20 (4): 123-129.
［16］ Lukas E, Thiergart S. The interaction of debt financing, cash grants and the optimal investment policy under uncertainty［J］. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 276(1), 284-299.
［17］ Sarkar S, Zhang C. Investment policy with time-to-build［J］. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2015, 55(c): 142-156.
［18］甘柳, 罗鹏飞, 杨招军. 运营滞后与信用担保互换下的项目投资决策模型［J］. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(3): 22-32.Gan Liu, Luo Pengfei, Yang Zhaojun. An investment decision-making model under implementation lag and equity-for-guarantee swap［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(3): 22-32.
［19］ Sarkar S. Optimal size, optimal timing and optimal financing of an investment［J］. Journal of Macroeconomics, 2011, 33(4): 681-689.
［20］ Wong K P. On the neutrality of debt in investment intensity［J］. Annals of Finance, 2010, 6(3): 335-356.
［21］ Hackbarth D, Hennessy C A, Leland H E. Can the trade-off theory explain debt structure?［J］. The Review of Financial Studies, 2007, 20(5): 1389-1428.
［22］ Morellec E, Valta P, Zhdanov A. Financing investment: the choice between bonds and bank loans［J］. Management Science, 2015, 61(11): 2580-2602.
［23］ Fan Hua, Sundaresan S M. Debt valuation, renegotiation, and optimal dividend policy［J］. The Review of Financial Studies, 2000, 13(4): 1057-1099.
［24］ Sundaresan S, Wang Neng. Investment under uncertainty with strategic debt service［J］. American Economic Review, 2007, 97(2): 256-261.
［25］ Leland H E. Agency costs, risk management, and capital structure［J］. The Journal of Finance, 1998, 53(4): 1213-1243.
［26］甘柳, 杨波. 时间偏好不一致下控制权私利与最优股权结构［J］.中国管理科学, 2020, 28(6): 51-62.Gan Liu, Yang Bo. Private benefits of control and optimal equity structure under time-inconsistent preferences ［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(3): 22-32.

[1]	郭冉冉,叶五一,刘小泉,缪柏其. 商品期货投资组合与市场收益的尾部相依研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(10): 11-19.
[2]	韩鑫韬,张晓敏,刘星. 宏观审慎管理配合下的最优货币政策选择[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(10): 1-10.
[3]	成思聪,王天一. 引入隔夜信息的期权定价模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 1-10.
[4]	吴鑫育,谢海滨,马超群. 经济政策不确定性与人民币汇率波动率[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(8): 1-14.
[5]	谢楠,何海涛,周艳菊,王宗润. 乡村振兴背景下基于中央政府项目补贴分析的供应链金融决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(8): 214-229.
[6]	于孝建,刘国鹏,刘建林,肖炜麟. 基于LSTM网络和文本情感分析的股票指数预测[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(8): 25-35.
[7]	倪宣明,郑田田,赵慧敏,武康平. 基于最优异质收益率因子的资产定价研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(8): 50-60.
[8]	于文华,任向阳,杨坤,魏宇. 传染病不确定性对大宗商品期货价格波动的非对称影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(5): 254-264.
[9]	蔡毅,唐振鹏,吴俊传,杜晓旭,陈凯杰. 基于灰狼优化的混频支持向量机在股指预测与投资决策中的应用研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(5): 73-80.
[10]	李仲飞,周骐. 一个基于BL模型和复杂网络的行业配置模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(4): 1-13.
[11]	张雪彤,张卫国,王超. 发达市场与新兴市场的尾部风险[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(4): 14-25.
[12]	尹海员,寇文娟. 基于朴素贝叶斯法的投资者情绪度量及其对股票特质风险的影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(4): 38-47.
[13]	王晓燕,杨胜刚,张科坤. 终极所有权结构与企业委托贷款行为[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(4): 48-57.
[14]	李爱忠,任若恩,董纪昌. 图网络风险感知与稀疏低秩的组合管理策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(4): 58-65.
[15]	吴鑫育,姜晓晴,李心丹,马超群. 基于已实现EGARCH-FHS模型的上证50ETF期权定价研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(3): 105-115.

研发项目投资决策与最优政府补贴研究

Research on R&D Project Investment Decision and Optimal Government Subsidies

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0