基于资源共享与子系统交互的两阶段DEA评价方法——兼对我国“一流大学”科研绩效的评价

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.0616

中国管理科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 256-263.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.0616

基于资源共享与子系统交互的两阶段DEA评价方法——兼对我国“一流大学”科研绩效的评价

杨敏^1,2, 费锡玥^1,2, 魏宇琪^1,2, 梁樑^1,2

1.合肥工业大学管理学院，安徽合肥230009;2.过程优化与智能决策教育部重点实验室，安徽合肥230009

收稿日期:2020-04-07 修回日期:2020-06-04 出版日期:2022-02-20 发布日期:2022-02-20
通讯作者: February,2022 E-mail:weiyuqi@mail.hfut.edu.cn
基金资助:
魏宇琪

Two-stage DEA Evaluation Method Based on Resource Sharing and Subsystem Interaction——Evaluation of Scientific Research Performance for “First-Class” Universities in China

YANG Min^1,2, FEI Xi-yue^1,2, WEI Yu-qi^1,2, LIANG Liang^1,2

1. School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei Anhui 230009, China;2. Key Laboratory of Process Optimization and Intelligent Decision-Making, Ministry of Education, Hefei Anhui 230009, China

Received:2020-04-07 Revised:2020-06-04 Online:2022-02-20 Published:2022-02-20
Contact: 魏宇琪(1995-)，男(汉族)，安徽宿州人，合肥工业大学管理学院，博士研究生，研究方向：绩效评价、应急物流等，Email:weiyuqi@mail.hfut.edu.cn. E-mail:weiyuqi@mail.hfut.edu.cn
Supported by:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71971074, 71601067)；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(PA2021KCPY0032)；合肥工业大学校级青年教师教学研究项目(JYQN1910)；安徽省自然科学基金面上资助项目(1708085MG176)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 由于复杂的竞争环境，共享资源下的交互系统组织形式变得越来越普遍，因此有必要开发一种新的方法来衡量这些系统与子系统的效率。针对复杂系统的绩效评价问题，本文提出资源共享与子系统交互的两阶段DEA评价方法予以应对。该方法在测定系统总效率的基础上，运用Stackelberg博弈方法构建模型求解出唯一的子系统(阶段)效率。最后，将该方法应用于我国40所“一流大学”科研系统绩效评价中，评价结果反映出一定的科研系统特征，并验证了该方法的有效性。

关键词: 资源共享；交互系统；两阶段；DEA

Abstract: Due to the complex competitive environment, interactive systems under shared resources are becoming more and more common, so it is necessary to develop a new method to measure the efficiency of these systems and subsystems. Aiming at the performance evaluation of complex systems, a two-stage DEA evaluation method is proposed for resource sharing and subsystem interaction. On the basis of measuring the overall efficiency of the system, the Stackelberg game idea is used to construct the model to obtain the unique subsystem efficiency. Finally, the method is applied to empirically analyze the performance of the research system for 40 “First-Class” universities in China. And the empirical results reflect certain scientific research system characteristics and verify the effectiveness of the method.

Key words: shared resources; subsystem interaction; DEA; two-stage

中图分类号:

杨敏, 费锡玥, 魏宇琪, 梁樑. 基于资源共享与子系统交互的两阶段DEA评价方法——兼对我国“一流大学”科研绩效的评价[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(2): 256-263.

YANG Min, FEI Xi-yue, WEI Yu-qi, LIANG Liang. Two-stage DEA Evaluation Method Based on Resource Sharing and Subsystem Interaction——Evaluation of Scientific Research Performance for “First-Class” Universities in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(2): 256-263.

参考文献

［1］韩松, 苏熊. 中国商业银行结构效率研究:基于复杂网络DEA模型［J］. 中国管理科学, 2016(8):1-9.Han Song, Su Xiong. Study on structure efficiency of Chinese commercial banking: basing on complex network DEA model［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(8):1-9.
［2］ An Qingxian, Yang Min, Chu Junfei, et al. Efficiency evaluation of an interactive system by data envelopment analysis approach［J］. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2017, 103, 17-25.
［3］熊曦, 关忠诚, 杨国梁,等. 嵌套并联结构两阶段 DEA下科技创新效率测度与分解［J］. 中国管理科学, 2019(3): 206-216.Xiong Xi, Guan Zhongcheng, Yang Guoliang, et al. Measuring S &T efficiency and its decomposition using a two-stage DEA model with nested parallel structure［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019(3): 206-216.
［4］费锡玥. 基于两阶段DEA模型的一流大学科研系统绩效评价研究［D］. 合肥：合肥工业大学，2021.Fei Xiyue. Research on performance evaluation of scientific research system of first-class university based on two-stage DEA model［D］. Hefei: Hefei University of Technology, 2021.
［5］郭新立. 基于DEA的学科有效性评价［J］. 中国管理科学, 2003, 11(6):77-80.Guo Xinli. Efficiency Measurement for the emphasis subjects based on DEA［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2003, 11(6):77-80.
［6］张志英, 张彦通. 对高校本科教学评估的分析与思考［J］. 中国管理科学, 2005,13(1):136-140.Zhang Zhiying, Zhang Yantong. Study on undergraduate teaching evaluation for higher education［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2005,13(1):136-140.
［7］陶杰, 卢超. 整数DEA问题的求解方法与改进［J］. 中国管理科学, 2017(6):151-160.Tao Jie, Lu Chao. Methods addressing integer-valued DEA problems and improvements［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017(6):151-160.
［8］薛晖, 郑中华, 谢启伟. 基于多种DEA模型和 Gini 准则的效率评价方法——兼对我国高校运营绩效的评价［J］. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(4): 98-104.Xue Hui, Zheng Zhonghua, Xie Qiwei. An approach on the performance evaluation problems based on multiple DEA models and gini criterion ——evaluating the performance of universities in China［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22(4): 98-104.
［9］ Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units［J］. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2(6): 429-444.
［10］ Sueyoshi Toshiyuki, Goto Mika. DEA approach for unified efficiency measurement: Assessment of Japanese fossil fuel power generation［J］. Energy Economics, 2011, 33(2): 292-303.
［11］ Du Juan, Wang Justin, Chen Yao, et al. Incorporating health outcomes in Pennsylvania hospital efficiency: An additive super-efficiency DEA approach［J］. Annals of Operations Research, 2014, 221(1): 161-172.
［12］ Aziz Nur Azina Abd, Janor Roziah Mohd, Mahadi Rasidah. Comparative departmental efficiency analysis within a university: A DEA approach［J］. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, 90(10): 540-548.
［13］ Wang Qunwei, Hang Ye, Sun Licheng, et al. Two-stage innovation efficiency of new energy enterprises in China: A non-radial DEA approach［J］. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2016, 112: 254-261.
［14］ Chen Liang, Jia Guozhu. Environmental efficiency analysis of China’s regional industry: A data envelopment analysis (DEA) based approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 142(2): 846-853.
［15］ Kao Chiang. Network data envelopment analysis: A review［J］. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 239(1): 1-16.
［16］ Cook Wade D, Liang Liang, Zhu Joe. Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: A review and future perspective［J］. Omega, 2010, 38(6): 423-430.
［17］卞亦文. 非合作博弈两阶段生产系统的环境效率评价［J］. 管理科学学报, 2012, 15(7), 11-19.Bian Yiwen. Eco-efficiency evaluation of non-cooperative game two-stage production system［J］. Journal of management sciences in China, 2012, 15(7), 11-19.
［18］ Zha Yong, Liang Nannan, Wu Maoguo, et al. Efficiency evaluation of banks in China: A dynamic two-stage slacks-based measure approach［J］. Omega, 2016, 60: 60-72.
［19］ Kao Chiang. Efficiency decomposition for parallel production systems［J］. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2012, 63(1): 64-71.
［20］ Lei Xiyang, Li Yongjun, Xie Qiwei, et al. Measuring Olympics achievements based on a parallel DEA approach［J］. Annals of Operations Research, 2015, 226(1): 379-396.
［21］ Amirteimoori Alireza. A DEA two-stage decision processes with shared resources［J］. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 2013, 21(1): 141-151.
［22］夏琼, 杨锋, 梁樑, 等. 非独立并联生产系统的 DEA效率评价研究［J］. 管理科学学报, 2012, 15(7): 20-25.Xia Qiong, Yang Feng, Liang Liang，et al. DEA efficiency evaluation of production systems with dependent parallel structure［J］. Journal of management sciences in China, 2012, 15(7): 20-25.
［23］ Wu Jie, Xiong Beibei, An Qingxian, et al. Total-factor energy efficiency evaluation of Chinese industry by using two-stage DEA model with shared inputs［J］. Annals of Operations Research, 2017, 255(1-2), 257-276.
［24］ Zhu Weiwei, Zhang Qian, Wang Haiqing. Fixed costs and shared resources allocation in two-stage network DEA［J］. Annals of Operations Research, 2017, 1-18. DOI: 10.1007/s10479-017-2599-8.
［25］ Zha Yong, Liang Liang. Two-stage cooperation model with input freely distributed among the stages［J］. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 205 (2), 332-338.
［26］毕功兵, 梁樑, 杨锋. 资源约束型两阶段生产系统的 DEA效率评价模型［J］. 中国管理科学, 2009, 17(2)： 71-75.Bi Gongbing, Liang Liang, Yang Feng. A DEA-based efficiency-measuring model for two-stage production systems with constrained resources［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2009, 17(2)：71-75.
［27］ Yang Guoliang, Fukuyama H, Song Y Y. Measuring the inefficiency of Chinese research universities based on a two-stage network DEA model［J］. Journal of Informetrics, 2018, 12(1): 10-30.
［28］ Hamilton J H, Slutsky S M. Endogenous timing in duopoly games: Stackelberg or cournot equilibria［J］. Games and Economic Behavior, 1990, 2(1): 29-46.

[1]	谢军,黄鹤. 考虑消费者退货的电商平台营销策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(10): 313-324.
[2]	肖泉,万杉杉,张星,蔡淑琴. IT可供性视角下移动直播电商平台用户质量感知与满意度研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(10): 181-193.
[3]	李伟伟,易平涛,王露. 基于行为特征分析的情境化评价方法及应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(10): 171-180.
[4]	陈雪龙,张钟,李悦. 临机决策视角下的非常规突发事件应急处置方案生成[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(10): 109-122.
[5]	胡婉婷,丁晶晶,梁樑. 基于期权代储协议的应急物资政企联合储备模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 101-112.
[6]	饶卫振,李淑琪,罗志兴. 考虑回收率提升效益的电子废弃物协作回收物流模式研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 225-236.
[7]	邹清明,刘春,曹裕. 碳交易机制下考虑公平关切产出不确定的低碳供应链减排与融资策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 248-259.
[8]	何一丹,何正文,王能民,马志强. 共享经济环境下的资源约束Max-NPV多项目调度优化[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 260-270.
[9]	陈强,荣俊美,常旭华,宫磊. 考虑奖惩差异的高校科研考评及专利审查策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 313-322.
[10]	聂如欣,田章朋,梁鹤鸣. 社会网络环境下基于行为管理的大群体共识决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 35-47.
[11]	陈璐,徐海燕,张瑾木子,何亮. 基于图模型理论的模糊权力不对称冲突研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 59-69.
[12]	刘洋,邓前前,樊治平,张琦. 网约车平台开放策略及其效率研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 82-92.
[13]	郑月龙,白春光,李登峰. 考虑市场化开发的产业共性技术供给决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(8): 127-138.
[14]	沈种,李星梅. 多种协同关系共同作用下的项目组合决策问题研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(8): 139-148.
[15]	李晓娜,马卫民. 需求不确定下高耗水企业节水服务外包决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(8): 230-240.

基于资源共享与子系统交互的两阶段DEA评价方法——兼对我国“一流大学”科研绩效的评价

Two-stage DEA Evaluation Method Based on Resource Sharing and Subsystem Interaction——Evaluation of Scientific Research Performance for “First-Class” Universities in China

PDF (Mobile)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0