中国管理科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 256-263.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.0616
• 论文 • 上一篇
杨敏1,2, 费锡玥1,2, 魏宇琪1,2, 梁樑1,2
收稿日期:
2020-04-07
修回日期:
2020-06-04
发布日期:
2022-03-02
通讯作者:
February,2022
E-mail:weiyuqi@mail.hfut.edu.cn
基金资助:
YANG Min1,2, FEI Xi-yue1,2, WEI Yu-qi1,2, LIANG Liang1,2
Received:
2020-04-07
Revised:
2020-06-04
Published:
2022-03-02
Contact:
魏宇琪(1995-),男(汉族),安徽宿州人,合肥工业大学管理学院,博士研究生,研究方向:绩效评价、应急物流等,Email:weiyuqi@mail.hfut.edu.cn.
E-mail:weiyuqi@mail.hfut.edu.cn
Supported by:
摘要: 由于复杂的竞争环境,共享资源下的交互系统组织形式变得越来越普遍,因此有必要开发一种新的方法来衡量这些系统与子系统的效率。针对复杂系统的绩效评价问题,本文提出资源共享与子系统交互的两阶段DEA评价方法予以应对。该方法在测定系统总效率的基础上,运用Stackelberg博弈方法构建模型求解出唯一的子系统(阶段)效率。最后,将该方法应用于我国40所“一流大学”科研系统绩效评价中,评价结果反映出一定的科研系统特征,并验证了该方法的有效性。
中图分类号:
杨敏, 费锡玥, 魏宇琪, 梁樑. 基于资源共享与子系统交互的两阶段DEA评价方法——兼对我国“一流大学”科研绩效的评价[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(2): 256-263.
YANG Min, FEI Xi-yue, WEI Yu-qi, LIANG Liang. Two-stage DEA Evaluation Method Based on Resource Sharing and Subsystem Interaction——Evaluation of Scientific Research Performance for “First-Class” Universities in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(2): 256-263.
[1] 韩松, 苏熊. 中国商业银行结构效率研究:基于复杂网络DEA模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016(8):1-9.Han Song, Su Xiong. Study on structure efficiency of Chinese commercial banking: basing on complex network DEA model[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(8):1-9. [2] An Qingxian, Yang Min, Chu Junfei, et al. Efficiency evaluation of an interactive system by data envelopment analysis approach[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2017, 103, 17-25. [3] 熊曦, 关忠诚, 杨国梁,等. 嵌套并联结构两阶段 DEA下科技创新效率测度与分解[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019(3): 206-216.Xiong Xi, Guan Zhongcheng, Yang Guoliang, et al. Measuring S &T efficiency and its decomposition using a two-stage DEA model with nested parallel structure[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019(3): 206-216. [4] 费锡玥. 基于两阶段DEA模型的一流大学科研系统绩效评价研究[D]. 合肥:合肥工业大学,2021.Fei Xiyue. Research on performance evaluation of scientific research system of first-class university based on two-stage DEA model[D]. Hefei: Hefei University of Technology, 2021. [5] 郭新立. 基于DEA的学科有效性评价[J]. 中国管理科学, 2003, 11(6):77-80.Guo Xinli. Efficiency Measurement for the emphasis subjects based on DEA[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2003, 11(6):77-80. [6] 张志英, 张彦通. 对高校本科教学评估的分析与思考[J]. 中国管理科学, 2005,13(1):136-140.Zhang Zhiying, Zhang Yantong. Study on undergraduate teaching evaluation for higher education[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2005,13(1):136-140. [7] 陶杰, 卢超. 整数DEA问题的求解方法与改进[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017(6):151-160.Tao Jie, Lu Chao. Methods addressing integer-valued DEA problems and improvements[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017(6):151-160. [8] 薛晖, 郑中华, 谢启伟. 基于多种DEA模型和 Gini 准 则的效率评价方法——兼对我国高校运营绩效的评价[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(4): 98-104.Xue Hui, Zheng Zhonghua, Xie Qiwei. An approach on the performance evaluation problems based on multiple DEA models and gini criterion ——evaluating the performance of universities in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22(4): 98-104. [9] Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2(6): 429-444. [10] Sueyoshi Toshiyuki, Goto Mika. DEA approach for unified efficiency measurement: Assessment of Japanese fossil fuel power generation[J]. Energy Economics, 2011, 33(2): 292-303. [11] Du Juan, Wang Justin, Chen Yao, et al. Incorporating health outcomes in Pennsylvania hospital efficiency: An additive super-efficiency DEA approach[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2014, 221(1): 161-172. [12] Aziz Nur Azina Abd, Janor Roziah Mohd, Mahadi Rasidah. Comparative departmental efficiency analysis within a university: A DEA approach[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, 90(10): 540-548. [13] Wang Qunwei, Hang Ye, Sun Licheng, et al. Two-stage innovation efficiency of new energy enterprises in China: A non-radial DEA approach[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2016, 112: 254-261. [14] Chen Liang, Jia Guozhu. Environmental efficiency analysis of China’s regional industry: A data envelopment analysis (DEA) based approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 142(2): 846-853. [15] Kao Chiang. Network data envelopment analysis: A review[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 239(1): 1-16. [16] Cook Wade D, Liang Liang, Zhu Joe. Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: A review and future perspective[J]. Omega, 2010, 38(6): 423-430. [17] 卞亦文. 非合作博弈两阶段生产系统的环境效率评价[J]. 管理科学学报, 2012, 15(7), 11-19.Bian Yiwen. Eco-efficiency evaluation of non-cooperative game two-stage production system[J]. Journal of management sciences in China, 2012, 15(7), 11-19. [18] Zha Yong, Liang Nannan, Wu Maoguo, et al. Efficiency evaluation of banks in China: A dynamic two-stage slacks-based measure approach[J]. Omega, 2016, 60: 60-72. [19] Kao Chiang. Efficiency decomposition for parallel production systems[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2012, 63(1): 64-71. [20] Lei Xiyang, Li Yongjun, Xie Qiwei, et al. Measuring Olympics achievements based on a parallel DEA approach[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2015, 226(1): 379-396. [21] Amirteimoori Alireza. A DEA two-stage decision processes with shared resources[J]. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 2013, 21(1): 141-151. [22] 夏琼, 杨锋, 梁樑, 等. 非独立并联生产系统的 DEA效率评价研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2012, 15(7): 20-25.Xia Qiong, Yang Feng, Liang Liang,et al. DEA efficiency evaluation of production systems with dependent parallel structure[J]. Journal of management sciences in China, 2012, 15(7): 20-25. [23] Wu Jie, Xiong Beibei, An Qingxian, et al. Total-factor energy efficiency evaluation of Chinese industry by using two-stage DEA model with shared inputs[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2017, 255(1-2), 257-276. [24] Zhu Weiwei, Zhang Qian, Wang Haiqing. Fixed costs and shared resources allocation in two-stage network DEA[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2017, 1-18. DOI: 10.1007/s10479-017-2599-8. [25] Zha Yong, Liang Liang. Two-stage cooperation model with input freely distributed among the stages[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 205 (2), 332-338. [26] 毕功兵, 梁樑, 杨锋. 资源约束型两阶段生产系统的 DEA效率评价模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2009, 17(2): 71-75.Bi Gongbing, Liang Liang, Yang Feng. A DEA-based efficiency-measuring model for two-stage production systems with constrained resources[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2009, 17(2):71-75. [27] Yang Guoliang, Fukuyama H, Song Y Y. Measuring the inefficiency of Chinese research universities based on a two-stage network DEA model[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2018, 12(1): 10-30. [28] Hamilton J H, Slutsky S M. Endogenous timing in duopoly games: Stackelberg or cournot equilibria[J]. Games and Economic Behavior, 1990, 2(1): 29-46. |
[1] | 曲薪池, 侯贵生, 孙向彦. 消费者异质偏好结构下动态创新竞合系统定价与创新策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(1): 88-99. |
[2] | 任爱俊, 冯耕中, 田军. 考虑恢复依赖的基础设施网络应急恢复决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(1): 154-164. |
[3] | 王田, 郑重. 产能不确定供应商的风险厌恶行为对供应链的影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(1): 165-174. |
[4] | 朱立龙, 荣俊美, 张思意. 政府奖惩机制下药品安全质量监管三方演化博弈及仿真分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(11): 55-67. |
[5] | 方雪清, 吴春胤, 俞守华, 张大斌, 欧阳庆. 基于EEMD-LSTM的农产品价格短期预测模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(11): 68-77. |
[6] | 林志炳, 鲍蕾. 企业社会责任对供应链减排决策及政府补贴效率的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(11): 111-121. |
[7] | 邓春生. 基于非线性系统稳定性理论的P2P网络借贷三方演化博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(11): 134-145. |
[8] | 周永务, 杨丽芳, 曹彬, 钟远光. 考虑公平关切行为下竞争零售商的最优联合购买策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(11): 158-169. |
[9] | 董银红, 郑琪, 李龙. 考虑供应风险的多源应急物资采购双层规划模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(11): 170-178. |
[10] | 胡凤英, 周正龙. 考虑社交关系的网购拼单研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(11): 191-202. |
[11] | 姚升保, 古淼. 移情关系影响下的群体共识决策模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(11): 203-214. |
[12] | 顾秋阳, 吴宝, 池仁勇. 考虑思考时滞的社交网络舆情最优控制模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(11): 215-223. |
[13] | 牛攀峰,侯文华. 考虑供应商产品交付水平的供应链融资策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(10): 70-83. |
[14] | 锁立赛,姚建明,周佳辉. 基于顾客需求偏好的面向无人零售终端的供应链资源整合优化研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(10): 84-95. |
[15] | 金飞飞,刘金培,陈华友,杜鹏程. 基于信任关系和信息测度的概率语义社会网络群决策模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(10): 178-190. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
|