基于多区域CGE模型的长江经济带一体化政策效果分析

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.12.007

中国管理科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (12): 67-76.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.12.007

基于多区域CGE模型的长江经济带一体化政策效果分析

李娜^1,2, 石敏俊³, 张卓颖⁴, 陈志钢⁵

1. 中国科学院大学经济与管理学院, 北京 100190;
2. 中国科学院虚拟经济与数据科学研究中心, 北京 100190;
3. 浙江大学公共管理学院, 浙江杭州 310058;
4. 中国科学院数学与系统科学研究院, 北京 100190;
5. 浙江大学中国农村发展研究院, 浙江杭州 310058

收稿日期:2019-03-07 修回日期:2019-10-22 出版日期:2020-12-20 发布日期:2021-01-11
通讯作者: 石敏俊(1964-),男(汉族),浙江新昌人,浙江大学公共管理学院,教授,博导,研究方向:城市与区域经济、绿色经济与可持续发展研究,E-mail:mjshi@zju.edu.cn. E-mail:mjshi@zju.edu.cn
基金资助:
世界银行委托国际粮食政策研究所项目；国家自然科学基金资助项目（71673262，71874183）；国家社会科学基金重大项目（15ZDC006）

Analysis on Policy Effects of Integration of Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on a Multi-regional CGE Model

LI Na^1,2, SHI Min-jun³, ZHANG Zhou-ying⁴, CHEN Zhi-gang⁵

1. School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
2. Research Center on Fictitious Economy and Data Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
3. School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China;
4. Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
5. China Academy for Rural Development, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China

Received:2019-03-07 Revised:2019-10-22 Online:2020-12-20 Published:2021-01-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 长江经济带是中国最具潜力的经济地带。如何充分发挥长江黄金水道作用，促进产业分工协作和有序转移，促进长江经济带一体化发展，已成为推动长江经济带高质量发展的重要课题。为此，政府制定怎样的政策以及政策效果如何，将对长江经济带一体化发展至关重要。本文构建了中国长江经济带的多区域CGE模型，并用其定量模拟研究了降低运输成本、促进产业转移以及复合政策等不同促进长江经济带一体化发展政策对长江经济带内部各区域经济和一体化发展的影响效果。研究表明降低运输成本和促进产业转移的复合政策，有助于促进产业转移并减轻对欠发达地区的负面冲击，有利于长江经济带的一体化发展及收入差距缩小，是较好的政策选择。促进长江经济带一体化发展，需要在加强交通基础建设的同时推进产业空间重构，可采取空间差异化的税收政策，鼓励产业转移，发展中西部地区的产业链和产业集群，同时管控好产业转移的环境风险。

关键词: 长江经济带, 区域经济一体化, 多区域CGE模型, 运输成本, 产业转移

Abstract: The Yangtze River Economic Belt is the most potential economic region in China. How to give full play to the role of the Yangtze golden waterway, promote the industrial division of labor, cooperation and orderly transfer, and accelerate the integrated development of the Yangtze River Economic Belt has become an important issue to promote the high-quality development of the Yangtze River Economic Belt. What kind of policies the government makes and how effective the policies are will be crucial to the integrated development of the Yangtze River Economic Belt. A multi-regional CGE model of China's Yangtze River economic belt is built with the database of 2012 interregional input-output table, and it is used to quantitatively simulate the impacts of different potential policies (reduce transportation costs, promote industrial spatial transfer, and mixed policy) for the integration of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, on the regional economy and the integration within the Yangtze River Economic Belt. The results show that:(1) Enhancing the east-west land transportation construction and reducing the transportation cost in the Yangtze River Economic Belt will facilitate the development of integration within the Yangtze River Economic Belt. The Yangtze River Delta and Sichuan will benefit significantly, while Chongqing will suffer a lot because of severer competition. (2) By implementation of different taxing rate across regions to enhance industrial spatial transfer, heavy chemical industry transfer can be promoted from the Yangtze River Delta with limited environmental bearing capacity to Chongqing-Sichuan and other upstream and middle stream regions. As a result, the income gap will narrow but economic integration effect in the Yangtze River Economic Belt will be not improved. (3) By combined use of abovementioned two policy, industry spatial transfer can be promoted while negative influence for less-developed area can be decreased, which contributes to the integration development and income gap reduction in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Therefore, to boost the integration development in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, it is necessary to promote industrial space reconstruction while strengthening transportation infrastructure construction. Spatially differentiated tax policy can be adopted to encourage industrial transfer, and industrial chains and clusters can be developed in the central and western regions. At the same time, the environmental risk of industrial transfer should be well controlled. The research results of this paper can provide important theoretical reference and decision support for the policy-making of the integrated development of the Yangtze River Economic Belt.

Key words: Yangtze River Economic Belt, regional economic integration, multi-regional computable general equilibrium model, transportation cost, industrial transfer

中图分类号:

F207

李娜, 石敏俊, 张卓颖, 陈志钢. 基于多区域CGE模型的长江经济带一体化政策效果分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(12): 67-76.

LI Na, SHI Min-jun, ZHANG Zhou-ying, CHEN Zhi-gang. Analysis on Policy Effects of Integration of Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on a Multi-regional CGE Model[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(12): 67-76.

参考文献

[1] 侯小菲. 长江经济带一体化发展面临的挑战与应对策略[J]. 区域经济评论, 2015, (5):48-55.
[2] 李小帆. 长江经济带城镇化空间效应研究[D]. 北京:中国地质大学, 2016.
[3] 陈明华, 刘华军, 孙亚男, 等. 中国五大城市群经济发展的空间差异及溢出效应[J]. 城市发展研究, 2016, 23(3):57-63.
[4] 潘文卿. 中国的区域关联与经济增长的空间溢出效应[J]. 经济研究, 2012, (1):54-65.
[5] 杨邦杰, 严以新, 安雪晖. 长江流域"黄金水道"问题分析及对策建议[J]. 中国发展, 2015, 15(1):1-7.
[6] 叶依广, 史嵘, 孙林. 加强长江流域东西部经济协作与协调发展的思考[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2003, (1):1-5.
[7] 李雪松, 孙博文. 密度、距离、分割与区域市场一体化——来自长江经济带的实证[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2015, (6):117-128.
[8] 张卓颖, 石敏俊. 中国省区间产业内贸易与产业结构同构分析[J]. 地理学报, 2011, (6):732-740.
[9] 金戈. 长三角地区制造业同构问题再考察-基于雁行模式的视角[J]. 经济地理, 2010, 30(2):249-255.
[10] 王志华, 焦海霞, 高杰. 考虑企业规模因素的长三角制造业同构现象解析[J]. 科技与管理, 2018, 20(2):19-25.
[11] 徐姝, 卞赛凤, 夏凯. 长江中游三省产业同构对区域协调能力的影响研究[J]. 商学研究, 2018, (2):95-104.
[12] 王林梅, 邓玲. 我国产业结构优化升级的实证研究——以长江经济带为例[J]. 经济问题, 2015, (5):39-43.
[13] 陈建军. 长江三角洲地区的产业同构及产业定位[J]. 中国工业经济, 2004, (2):19-26.
[14] 黄庆华, 周志波, 刘晗. 长江经济带产业结构演变及政策取向[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2014, (6):92-101.
[15] Lewis W A. The state of development theory[J]. The American Economic Review, 1984, 74:1-10.
[16] Vernon R. International investment and international trade in the product cycle[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1966, 80:190-207.
[17] Copeland B R, Taylor M S. Trade,growth and the environment[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2004, 42(1):7-71.
[18] 陈建军. 中国现阶段产业区域转移的实证研究——结合浙江105家企业的问卷调查报告的分析[J]. 管理世界, 2002, (6):64-74.
[19] 朱佩楓, 张浩, 张慧明. 考虑非期望产出的皖江城市带承接长三角产业转移效率研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2014, (7):105-114.
[20] 王磊, 翟博文. 长江经济带交通基础设施对经济增长的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(1):6-12.
[21] 戢晓峰, 张玲, 陈方. 物流一体化视角下城市群空间组织优化研究——以长江经济带城市群为例[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2015, 34(5):24-28.
[22] 龙云安. CAFTA产业集聚与平衡发展效应实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(7):100-106.
[23] 胡黎明, 赵瑞霞. 产业集群式转移与区域生产网络协同演化及政府行为研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(3):76-84.
[24] 段学军, 邹辉, 王磊. 长江经济带建设与发展的体制机制探索[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(11):1377-1387.
[25] Kim E, Kim K. Impacts of regional development strategies on growth and equity of Korea:A multiregional CGE model[J]. The Annals of Regional Science, 2002, 36:165-180.
[26] 李善同, 何健武. 中国可计算一般均衡模型及其应用[M]. 北京:经济科学出版社, 2010.
[27] 石敏俊等. 区域发展政策模拟[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2017.
[28] Lofgren H, Harris R, Robinson S. A standard computable general equilibrium model in GAMS[R]. Working Paper, International Food Policy Research Institute, 2002.
[29] Armington, P S. A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production[R]. Working Paper, International Monetary Fund, 1969.

基于多区域CGE模型的长江经济带一体化政策效果分析

Analysis on Policy Effects of Integration of Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on a Multi-regional CGE Model

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	唐松林, 周文兵, 王国成. 房价变动、产业转移与区域协调发展——以京津冀地区为例[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(3): 14-23.
[2]	李剑, 苏秦. 考虑运输过程的供应链减排模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(2): 78-86.
[3]	龙云安. CAFTA产业集聚与平衡发展效应实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(7): 100-106.
[4]	鲁奎, 杨昌辉, 戴道明. 一种能力外包且费用时变批量问题的启发式算法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2008, 16(1): 80-85.