考虑运输过程的供应链减排模型研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2017.02.009

中国管理科学 ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (2): 78-86.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2017.02.009

考虑运输过程的供应链减排模型研究

李剑^1,2,3, 苏秦^1,2,3

1. 西安交通大学管理学院, 陕西西安 710049;
2. 机械制造系统工程国家重点实验室, 陕西西安 710049;
3. 过程控制与效率工程教育部重点实验室, 陕西西安 710049

收稿日期:2015-08-06 修回日期:2016-05-20 出版日期:2017-02-20 发布日期:2017-05-03
通讯作者: 李剑(1986-),男(汉族),陕西宝鸡人,西安交通大学管理学院博士研究生,研究方向:低碳供应链管理,E-mail:ljlcxwxz@stu.xjtu.edu.cn. E-mail:ljlcxwxz@stu.xjtu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重大项目（71390330）；国家自然科学基金面上项目（71371151）；教育部人文社科基金（13YJA630078）

The Study of Emission Reduction Model for Supply Chain Considering Transportation

LI Jian^1,2,3, SU Qin^1,2,3

1. School of Management, Xi'an Jiantong University, Xi'an 710049, China;
2. State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Xi'an 710049, China;
3. The MOE Key Lab for Process Control & Efficiency Engineering, Xi'an 710049, China

Received:2015-08-06 Revised:2016-05-20 Online:2017-02-20 Published:2017-05-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以零售商-生产商两阶段供应链为研究对象，考虑运输过程，并将碳税内部化在运输成本中，建立包含减排投资在内的碳交易模型，通过对实施碳政策前后模型的比较分析，研究复合碳政策对供应链的影响机理。研究表明：在零售商运输与成本比小于一常数的约束下，碳税通过提高能源价格进而减少运输中碳排放；在碳配额的严格限制下，减排投资下的碳交易政策可以使得生产商成本和碳排放实现双重优化；生产商通过承担部分比例的运输费用实现上下游企业决策的统一，复合碳政策可以有效地降低生产商协调成本。最后通过算例进一步对模型进行了验证和分析。

关键词: 供应链, 碳税, 碳交易, 减排投资, 运输成本

Abstract: Based on two-stage supply chain system for retailer-and-manufacturer, considering transportation process of including carbon tax cost, a carbon trading model that take into account investment for reducing emission is established in the paper, and model under carbon policy is compared to that under no policy. By this, the influence mechanism of carbon policies on supply chain is studied. The results show:under the constraint of the ratio of transportation and cost for retailer, carbon tax raises the price of energy and reduces emissions; under the constraint of the strict cap, carbon trading policy including investment for emissions reduction can realize the dual optimization of the manufacturer cost and emissions; manufacturer taking the partial transportation can achieve the coordination of supply chain, and the multiple carbon policies can reduce coordination cost. Finally, the models are verified and analyzed by a numerical example.

Key words: supply chain, carbon tax, carbon trading, investment for reducing emissions, transportation cost

中图分类号:

F224.32

李剑, 苏秦. 考虑运输过程的供应链减排模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(2): 78-86.

LI Jian, SU Qin. The Study of Emission Reduction Model for Supply Chain Considering Transportation[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017, 25(2): 78-86.

参考文献

[1] Keskin N, Plambeck E. Greenhouse gas emissions accounting:Allocating emissions from processes to co-products[R]. Working Paper,SSRN,2011.

[2] Stern N H. Stern Review:The economics of climate change[M]. London:HM treasury, 2006.

[3] Khan M, Jaber M Y, Wahab M I M. Economic order quantity model for items with imperfect quality with learning in inspection[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2010, 124(1):87-96.

[4] Hsu J T, Hsu L F. An integrated vendor-buyer cooperative inventory model in an imperfect production process with shortage backordering[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2013, 65(1-4):493-505.

[5] Hong K, Yeo S S, Kim H J, et al. Integrated inventory and transportation decision for ubiquitous supply chain management[J]. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2012, 23(4):977-988.

[6] Abdallah T, Farhat A, Diabat A, et al. Green supply chains with carbon trading and environmental sourcing:Formulation and life cycle assessment[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2012, 36(9):4271-4285.

[7] Benjaafar S, Li Yanzhi, Daskin M. Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains:Insights from simple models[J]. IEEE Transactions on, Automation Science and Engineering, 2013, 10(1):99-116.

[8] 李剑,苏秦.考虑碳税政策对供应链决策的影响研究[J].软科学,2015,29(3):52-58.

[9] 楼高翔,张洁琼,范体军,等. 非对称信息下供应链减排投资策略及激励机制[J]. 管理科学学报,2016(2):42-52.

[10] 骆瑞玲, 范体军, 夏海洋. 碳排放交易政策下供应链碳减排技术投资的博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(11):44-53.

[11] 李剑,苏秦,马俐.碳排放约束下供应链的碳交易模型研究[J].中国管理科学,2016,24(4):54-62.

[12] 黄帝,陈剑,周泓. 配额-交易机制下动态批量生产和减排投资策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(4):129-137.

[13] Toptal A, Özlü H, Konur D. Joint decisions on inventory replenishment and emission reduction investment under different emission regulations[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2014, 52(1):243-269.

[14] 李进, 张江华. 碳交易机制对物流配送路径决策的影响研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2014, 34(7):1779-1787.

[15] 杨珺, 卢巍. 低碳政策下多容量等级选址与配送问题研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(5):51-60.

[16] Jin M, Granda-Marulanda N A, Down I. The impact of carbon policies on supply chain design and logistics of a major retailer[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2013,85(15):453-461.

[17] Cachon G P. Retail store density and the cost of greenhouse gas emissions[J]. Management Science, 2014, 60(8):1907-1925.

[18] Konur D. Carbon constrained integrated inventory control and truckload transportation with heterogeneous freight trucks[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2014, 153(7):268-279.

[19] Konur D, Schaefer B. Integrated inventory control and transportation decisions under carbon emissions regulations:LTL vs. TL carriers[J]. Transportation Research Part E:Logistics and Transportation Review, 2014, 68(8):14-38.

[20] Battini D, Persona A, Sgarbossa F. A sustainable EOQ model:Theoretical formulation and applications[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2014, 149(3):145-153.

[21] Duan Hengbo, Zhu Lei, Fan Ying. Optimal carbon taxes in carbon-constrained China:A logistic-induced energy economic hybrid model[J]. Energy, 2014, 69(1):345-356.

[22] Hua Guowei, Cheng T C E, Wang Shouyang. Managing carbon footprints in inventory management[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2011, 132(2):178-185.

[23] Suzuki Y. A new truck-routing approach for reducing fuel consumption and pollutants emission[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2011, 16(1):73-77.

[24] Jaber M Y, Glock C H, El Saadany A M A. Supply chain coordination with emissions reduction incentives[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2013, 51(1):69-82.

考虑运输过程的供应链减排模型研究

The Study of Emission Reduction Model for Supply Chain Considering Transportation

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	黄苒,胡丽琴,李梦圆. 专有关系投资、议价力与企业违约风险[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 11-23.
[2]	李勇,陈元,于辉. 缓解牛鞭效应的新途径：人机协同的智慧决策机器人[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 113-120.
[3]	何浩嘉,艾兴政,唐华,郭松波. 基于链与链竞争的最优专利许可策略选择[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 142-153.
[4]	张艳芬,徐琪,孙中苗. 供应商竞争下考虑道德风险的平台供应链最优动态激励契约[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 160-170.
[5]	余乐安,王丹萍,曾能民. 突发事件风险下的供应链重构策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 93-100.
[6]	牟宗玉,杨晓霞,李珂,张桂涛. 智慧平台供应链的在线助农模式和融资策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(8): 170-181.
[7]	谢楠,何海涛,周艳菊,王宗润. 乡村振兴背景下基于中央政府项目补贴分析的供应链金融决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(8): 214-229.
[8]	李飚,夏西强,李秋月. 碳配额下碳交易对碳减排效应的影响及协调机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(8): 250-260.
[9]	任廷海,周茂森,曾能民. 软件服务供应链中软件开发商的授权销售与市场入侵策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(7): 117-128.
[10]	孙文婷,彭红军. 电商助农背景下农产品生产与销售策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(7): 181-189.
[11]	李宗活,李善良,陈祥锋,胡淼. 考虑消费者时间价值的平台供应链即时零售引入策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(7): 225-235.
[12]	王文宾,刘业,全诗苑,钟罗升,吕佳. 双销售渠道闭环供应链的政府补贴模式研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(7): 258-269.
[13]	李进,刘格格,张海霞,张江华. 基于消费者绿色偏好和渠道竞争的制造商分散式入侵策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(7): 281-290.
[14]	潘琳,徐夏静,周荣庭. 博弈视角下社区生鲜食品供应链双渠道动态定价研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(7): 300-310.
[15]	贾俊秀,侯毅姝,杜黎. 考虑转诊率的健康服务质量及定价决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(6): 109-119.