基于HTFWGBM算子的供应商选择模型研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.03.014

中国管理科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (3): 137-143.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.03.014

基于HTFWGBM算子的供应商选择模型研究

张健

重庆文理学院经济管理学院, 重庆 402160

收稿日期:2017-05-17 修回日期:2017-09-04 出版日期:2019-03-20 发布日期:2019-04-28
通讯作者: 张健(1980-),男(汉族),吉林长春人,重庆文理学院经济管理学院,博士,高级工程师,研究方向:多属性决策,E-mail:zhangjian_jida@yeah.net. E-mail:zhangjian_jida@yeah.net
基金资助:
湖北省技术创新专项（软科学研究）资助项目（2016ADC036）

Research on the Model of Supplier Selection with HTFWGBM Operator

ZHANG Jian

School of Economics and Management, Chongqing University of Arts and Science, Chongqing 402160, China

Received:2017-05-17 Revised:2017-09-04 Online:2019-03-20 Published:2019-04-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 由于供应商选择中的的复杂性与不确定性以及人类认知的有限性，从而导致信息融合失真和决策结果不准确的情况。针对决策属性以犹豫三角模糊数（HTFN）给出的供应商的选择问题，本文提出一种基于HTFGWBM算子的决策算法。首先，针对犹豫三角模糊数和几何Bonferroni平均算子理论，分别定义了犹豫三角模糊几何Bonferroni平均（HTFGBM）算子和犹豫三角模糊几何加权Bonferroni平均（HTFGWBM）算子，同时分别研究了算子的幂等性，置换不变性，单调性和有界性等性质。其次，基于HTFGWBM算子构建新型犹豫多属性决策模型，结合HTFN排序方法进行备选供应商排序。最后通过算南水北调中线工程中的供应商选择实例证明了决策模型的可行性与有效性。结果表明，通过调整模型参数，模型具有一定的延展性和容错能力，能够很好的进行科学决策。

关键词: 多属性决策, 几何Bonferroni平均算子, 供应商选择模型, 犹豫三角模糊几何加权Bonferroni平均算子

Abstract: The complexity, uncertainty and limitation of human cognition in the processes of supplier selection lead to the distortion of information fusion and inaccuracy of decision-making. With respect of decision-making problems about supplier selection introduced by decision-making attributes and hesitate triangular fuzzy numbers (HTFN), a decision-making algorithm based on hesitate triangular fuzzy geometric weighted Bonferroni mean (HTFGWBM) operators is propased in this paper. First, in terms of hesitate triangular fuzzy numbers and geometric Bonferroni mean operator theory, HTFGWBM operators and hesitate triangular fuzzy geometric weighted Bonferroni mean (HTFGWBM) operator are defined respectively, and their constraints are explored, such as attributes of monotonic, limited and idempotent. Combining with HTFN sorting methods, then alternative suppliers based on the new hesitate multi-attribute decision-making model constructed with HTFGWBM operators are sequenced. Finally, a suppler selection example from an empirical project is illustrated to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed decision-making model. The results show that this model is equipped with ductility and fault tolerance via the adjustment of parameters, which can be used in scientific decision-making.

Key words: multi-attribute decision-making, geometric Bonferroni mean operator, suppliers selection model, hesitate triangular fuzzy geometric weighted Bonferroni mean operator

中图分类号:

C934

张健. 基于HTFWGBM算子的供应商选择模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(3): 137-143.

ZHANG Jian. Research on the Model of Supplier Selection with HTFWGBM Operator[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(3): 137-143.

参考文献

[1] Atanassov K. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1986, 20:87-96.

[2] Atanassov K, Gargov G. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1989,31:343-349.

[3] Xu Zeshui, Yager R R. Intuitionistic and interval-valued intutionistic fuzzy preference relations and their measures of similarity for the evaluation of agreement within a group[J]. Fuzzy Optimization Decision Making,2009,8(2):123-139.

[4] Shu Ming-huang, Cheng Ching-hsue, Chang Jing-rong. Using intuitionistic fuzzy sets for fault tree analysis on printed circuit board assembly[J]. Microelectronics Reliability, 2006,46:2139-2148.

[5] Li Dengfeng. A ratio ranking method of triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and its application to MADM problems[J].Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 2010,60(6):1557-1570.

[6] Wang Jianqiang, Zhang Zhong. Aggregation operators on intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy number and its application to multicriteria decision making problems[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2009, 20(2):321-326.

[7] Wei Guiwu. Some arithmetic aggregation operators with intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers and their application to group decision making[J]. Journal of Computers,2010,5(3):345-351.

[8] Torra V, Narukawa Y.On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision[C]//Fuzzy Systems,the 18th IEEE International Conference,Jeju Island, Korea, August 20-24, 2009:1378-1382.

[9] Torra V. Hesitant fuzzy sets[J]. International Journal of In telligent Systems,2010,25:12-20.

[10] Chen Na, Xu Zeshui, Xia Meimei. Interval-valued hesitant preference relations and their applications to group decision making[J].Knowledge-Based Systems, 2013, 37:528-540.

[11] Chen Na, Xu Zeshui, Xia Meimei. Correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy sets and theirapplications to clustering analysis[J]. Applied Mathematical Modeling, 2013, 37(4):2197-2211.

[12] Xia Meimei,Xu Zeshui.Hesitant fuzzy information aggregationin decision making[J].International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,2011,52(3):395-407.

[13] Xia Meimei,Xu Zeshui,Chen Na. Some hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators with their application in group decision making[J].Group Decision and Negotiation,2013,22(2):259-279.

[14] Wei Guiwu, Zhao Xiaofei, Lin Rui. Some hesitant interval-valued fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multiple attribute decision making[J].Knowledge-Based Systems,2013, 46:43-53.

[15] Zhao Xiaofei, Lin Rui,Wei Guiwu. Hesitant triangular fuzzy information aggregation based on Einstein operations and their application to multiple attribute decision making[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2014,41(4):1086-1094.

[16] Xia Meimei,Xu Zeshui,Zhu Bin.Geometric Bonferroni means with their application in multi-criteria decision making[J].Knowledge-Based Systems,2013,40:88-100.

[17] Xu Zeshui.Fuzzy harmonic mean operators[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2009, 24(2), 152-172.

[18] 周晓辉,姚俭,吴天魁,等. 三角模糊数直觉模糊Bonferroni平均算子及其应用[J].计算机应用研究, 2015, 32(2):434-438.

[19] 周晓辉,姚俭,孙文浩,等. 区间直觉模糊几何Bonferroni平均算子及其应用[J].计算机工程与应用, 2016, 52(3):12-16.

[20] 梁邦龙,林杰,袁光辉. 基于HTFWBM算子的多属性关联决策方法[J].科技管理研究, 2016, 52(23):244-248.

[21] Xu Zeshui, Yager R R. Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. International Journal of General Systems,2006,35(4):417-433.

基于HTFWGBM算子的供应商选择模型研究

Research on the Model of Supplier Selection with HTFWGBM Operator

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	李鹏, 沈志杰. 基于Heronian平均算子的Pythagorean模糊不确定语言决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(1): 217-225.
[2]	张发明, 王伟明. 基于后悔理论和DEMATEL的语言型多属性决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(6): 201-210.
[3]	范建平, 刘胜男, 吴美琴. 单值Neutrosophic sets环境下基于参照系数的VIKOR方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(6): 136-145.
[4]	曾守桢, 穆志民. 基于混合加权距离的毕达哥拉斯模糊TOPSIS多属性决策方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(3): 198-205.
[5]	潘亚虹, 耿秀丽. 基于Mo-RVIKOR的混合多属性决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(12): 143-151.
[6]	余高锋, 李登峰, 吴坚, 叶银芳. 考虑决策者损失规避的异质信息多属性变权决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(9): 141-147.
[7]	李春好, 李巍, 何娟, 李孟姣, 马慧欣. 目标导向层次分析方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(9): 170-182.
[8]	徐海军, 田晓丽, 徐泽水. 基于犹豫模糊语言信息的前景决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(8): 179-185.
[9]	李春好, 李孟姣, 田硕. 属性集容量确定的夹挤式测度模式及其推算模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(3): 117-125.
[10]	杜涛, 冉伦, 李金林, 曹雪丽. 基于效率的组织多属性决策及实证研究：DEA-TOPSIS组合方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(7): 153-162.
[11]	杜元伟, 王素素, 杨宁, 周雯. 考虑专家知识结构的不完备型多属性大群体决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(12): 167-178.
[12]	丁涛, 梁樑. 基于方案占优和排序稳健性的多属性决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(8): 132-138.
[13]	刘德海. 基于最大偏差原则的群体性事件应急管理绩效评价模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(4): 138-147.
[14]	姜广田. 考虑决策者心理行为的混合型随机多属性决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(6): 78-84.
[15]	梁燕华, 郭鹏, 朱煜明. 基于样本集的区间数灰靶分类决策模型及应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(5): 98-103.