主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2006, Vol. ›› Issue (4): 25-29.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

边界Logistic违约率模型Bayes分析及实证研究

石晓军1, 任若恩1, 肖远文2   

  1. 1. 北京航空航天大学经济管理学院, 北京, 100083;
    2. 北京华油天然气有限责任公司, 北京, 100101
  • 收稿日期:2005-07-05 修回日期:2006-07-03 出版日期:2006-08-28 发布日期:2012-03-07
  • 基金资助:
    高校博士学科点基金资助项目(2005006004)

Bounded Logistic Default Model and Empirical Evidences from China

SHI Xiao-jun1, REN Ruo-en1, XIAO Yuan-wen2   

  1. 1. School of Management, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. Beijing HuaYou Natrual Gas Co.Ltd., Beijing 100101, China
  • Received:2005-07-05 Revised:2006-07-03 Online:2006-08-28 Published:2012-03-07

摘要: Cramer[1]指出了一般Logistic违约率模型容易出现的问题并提出了边界Logistic违约率模型.本文采用了不同于Cramer(2004)的Bayes分析方法对边界Logistic模型的后验分布的性质进行了分析,从理论上说明了边界Logistic违约率模型更优越的原因.然后利用中国公司数据展开实证研究,不仅找到了Cramer问题的中国证据,同时还发现Bayes边界Logistic违约率模型不仅能够克服Cramer问题,而且对临界值不敏感,同时预测效率也相对较高.

关键词: Logistic, 违约, 边界Logistic, Bayes分析

Abstract: Cramer (2004) pointed out shortcoming of plain Logistic default model and put forward bounded Logistic model.This paper does some further research about bounded Logistic default model.We first demonstrate why bounded Logistic default model is superior to plain Logistic model theoretically through Bayes analysis.Then we give empirical evidences based on China companies' data.We not only find evidences about Cramer's problem,but also find that bounded Logistic model can solve the Cramer's problem,which is not sensitive to critical value and has higher prediction efficiency.

Key words: logistic, default, bounded logistic, bayes analysis

中图分类号: