企业种群间协同演化的规律与实证研究

中国管理科学 ›› 2004, Vol. ›› Issue (5): 137-143.

企业种群间协同演化的规律与实证研究

李文华, 韩福荣

北京工业大学经济与管理学院北京 100022

收稿日期:2004-04-23 出版日期:2004-10-28 发布日期:2012-03-07
基金资助:
北京市自然科学基金资助项目(9982001)

Studies on Corrdinated Evolwtion Laws between Indurty Poipulations and Impirical Analysis

LI Wen-hua, HAN Fu-rong

College of Economics and Management, Beijing Polytechnic University, Beijing 100022, China

Received:2004-04-23 Online:2004-10-28 Published:2012-03-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文通过定义两个不同但又存在某种关系的企业种群的共生互利关系、协同演化以及度量其程度的概念;分析其一般协同演化的规律以及渐进型不断改进、突破性技术创新、新技术标准的确立对计算硬件及软件两个企业种群协同演化、相互促进的影响,提出了4种假设。限于数据搜集的困难,仅仅就其中的假设1-2进行了定量的实证,对假设1-4做定性的实证检验,定性和定量的实证结果支持假设1-4。

关键词: 企业种群, 协同演化, 计算机

Abstract: By defining the concepts of coexistenee,mutual favors,Coordinated evolution and their measurement for two different but some-extent-related industry populations,this paper analyzes the general coordinated evolu-tion law and the impact of continuous improvement,braking-through technological innovation and new techni-cal standard determination on corrdinated evolution and mutual promotion of two industry populations:hardware and software of computers,and puts forward four assumptions.

Key words: industry population, coordinated evolution, computer

中图分类号:

F8301.9

李文华, 韩福荣. 企业种群间协同演化的规律与实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2004, (5): 137-143.

LI Wen-hua, HAN Fu-rong. Studies on Corrdinated Evolwtion Laws between Indurty Poipulations and Impirical Analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2004, (5): 137-143.

参考文献

[1] Hannan,M. T. ,and Carroll,G. R. Dynamics of Organizational Populations: Density, Legitimation and Competition [M]. Oxford University Press,New York, 1992.
[2] Hannan,M. T. ,and Freeman,J. The population ecology of organizations[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1977,82:929 - 964.
[3] Hannan,M. T. ,and Carroll,G. R. Theory building and cheap talk about legitimation: Reply to Baum and Powell [J]. American sociological Review, 1995,60: 539 - 544.
[4] Olav Sorenson. The Effect of population - Level Learning on Market Entry: The American Automobile Industry[J].Social science Research,2000,29: 307 - 326.
[5] Hannan, M. T. Inertia, density and the structure of organizational populations: Entries in European automobile industries, 1886 - 1981[J]. Organization Studies, 1997,18:193 - 228.
[6] Hannan, M. T. , Carroll, G. R. Dundon,E. A. ,and Torres,J. C. Organizational evolution in a multinational context: Entries of automobile manufacturers in Belgium,Britain, France, Germany, and Italy[J]. American sociological Review, 1995,60: 509 - 528.
[7] Lyda S. Bigelow, Glenn R. Carroll, Marc - David L. Seidel, Lucia Tsai. Legitimation, Geographical Scale, and Organizational Density: Regional Patterns of Foundings of American Automobile Producers, 1885 - 1981 [J]. Social Science Research, 1997,26: 377 - 398.
[8] Gregory N. Price. The Determinants of Entry for BlackOwned Commercial Banks [J]. The Quarterly Review of Economia and Finance. 1995,35(3) :289 - 303.
[9] Carl M. Campbell, Ⅲ. The Effects of State and Industry Economic Conditions on New Firm Entry[J]. Journal of Economics and Business, 1996,48:167- 193.
[10] Jocl A. C. Baum,Helaine J. Korn,Suresh Kotha. Dominant Designs and Population Dynamics in Telecommunication Services: Founding and Failure of Facsimile Transmission Service Organizations, 1965 - 1992 [J]. Social science Research, 1995 ,24:97 - 135.
[11] Murray B. Low, Eric Abrahamson. Movements, Bandwagons, and Clones: Industry Evolution and the Entrepreneurial Process [J]. Journal of Business Venturing,1997,12:435 - 457.
[12] P. A. Geroski,M. Mazzucato. Modelling the dynamics of industry populations [J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2001,19:1003 - 1022.
[13] Dosi G. Technical Change and Industrial Transformation [M]. New York:St. Martin's Press.
[14] Tushman M. L. ,Anderson P. Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environment [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1986,31:439 - 465.
[15] Tushman M. L. ,Rosenkopf L. Organizational Determinants of Technological Change: Toward a sociology of Technological evolution [J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1992,14: 311 - 347.
[16] Anderson P. ,Tushman M. L. Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs:A cyclical model of Technological Change [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35 : 604 - 633.
[17] Utterback J. M. ,Abernathy W. J. A Dynamic Model of Product and Process Innovation[J]. Omega, 1975,33,639 - 656.