主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12): 206-214.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2023.1863

• • 上一篇    下一篇

平台数字内容产品免费体验的信号效应研究

刘源1, 喻迎2, 陈宏民3()   

  1. 1.广东工业大学管理学院,广东 广州 510520
    2.澳门理工大学人文及社会科学学院,澳门特别行政区 999078
    3.上海交通大学安泰经济与管理学院,上海 201406
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-06 修回日期:2024-02-03 出版日期:2024-12-25 发布日期:2025-01-02
  • 通讯作者: 陈宏民 E-mail:hmchen@sjtu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    中国博士后科学基金第75批面上项目(2024M750571);国家自然科学基金面上项目(72472101);教育部哲社重大课题攻关项目(20JZD010)

Research on the Signaling Effects of Free Experience in Platform Digital Contents

Yuan Liu1, Ying Yu2, Hongmin Chen3()   

  1. 1.School of Management,Guangdong University of Technology,Guangzhou 510520,China
    2.Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences,Macao Polytechnic University,Macao 999078,China
    3.Antai College of Economics & Management,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 201406,China
  • Received:2023-11-06 Revised:2024-02-03 Online:2024-12-25 Published:2025-01-02
  • Contact: Hongmin Chen E-mail:hmchen@sjtu.edu.cn

摘要:

在平台诸多数字内容产品中,免费体验的策略得到广泛的推行,例如软件试用、游戏试玩、电子书试读等。免费体验能帮助用户切身地体验到产品,有益于减少产品质量信息的不对称。传统的信号博弈模型只包括信号发送方和接收方,而在本文的模型中,作为中介的平台也参与到了博弈中。研究表明:在重复购买的环境下,平台的加入将有益于免费体验发挥信号效应,分离均衡更有可能形成。当平台不参与博弈时,若免费体验的质量不能传递信息,那么免费体验也不能产生信号效应;在平台加入博弈后,即使免费体验的质量不能传递信息,平台也可以通过向厂商收取一定门槛的广告费,来促进分离均衡的产生。本文为数字内容厂商的市场决策以及平台的管理策略提供了有益启示。

关键词: 免费体验, 平台, 数字内容, 信号效应

Abstract:

In digital platforms, it is often challenging to provide users with comprehensive information about the quality of digital content products. To address this issue, many firms have adopted strategies that involve offering partial product content for free experience (FE). On video streaming platforms, users can watch certain content for free; music platforms provide extensive libraries of trial tracks; game platforms offer free trial versions of some games, and e-book platforms allow users to access free sample chapters. The FE strategy allows users to experience the product firsthand, which is beneficial in reducing information asymmetry regarding product quality.Traditional signaling game models typically involve only the signaling sender and receiver. In this paper, the platform, acting as an intermediary, is incorporated into the signaling game as an additional participant. A microeconomic theoretical model is constructed based on the signaling theory to analyze the signaling effects of firms providing FE to users on platforms. Some typical features of FE are incorporated into a signaling game model, with a particular focus on scenarios where the quality of FE fails to convey information. By comparing equilibrium solutions in cases where the platform does not participate in the game and where the platform does participate in the game, the influence of the platform is investigated as an intermediary in the signaling game.The managerial insights of this paper include two main points. Firstly, platforms should establish a screening mechanism, imposing certain advertising fees thresholds on firms. This would benefit users in distinguishing firms with varying levels of quality and mitigate the issue of information asymmetry regarding product quality. Secondly, platforms should incentivize firms to maintain consistency in the quality of their trial products and final products. When there is a significant disparity between the quality of trial products and final products in the market, users will no longer rely on the quality of free trials to assess product quality. This, in turn, diminishes the effectiveness of free trials as a means of conveying information, ultimately harming the welfare of both the platform and the firms. When users generally lack trust in the quality of trial products, it can lead to a collapse of market trust, resulting in a “lose-lose” situation.The main findings of our paper are as follows (1) When considering the informational role of FE quality, the high-quality firms can obtain higher profits if it is difficult for the low-quality firms to imitate. Conversely, if the imitation is relatively easy, high-quality firms need to increase their investment in FE to render the imitation behavior of low-quality firms unprofitable. (2) The informational effect of FE quality is more prominent in the short term. In cases of repeat purchases, whether the FE quality conveys information or not does not significantly impact the profits of the platform and the firms. (3) When the FE quality fails to convey any information, the platform should charge firms a certain threshold of advertising fees. This measure ensures that low-quality firms will find it unprofitable to imitate high-quality firms, while high-quality firms will not exit the market due to excessively high platform fees, ultimately promoting the occurrence of separating equilibria.

Key words: free experience, platform, digital contents, signaling effects

中图分类号: