中国管理科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (10): 142-154.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.0550
邹清明, 胡李庆, 邹霆钧
收稿日期:
2020-03-30
修回日期:
2020-09-07
出版日期:
2022-10-20
发布日期:
2022-10-12
通讯作者:
邹清明(1967-),男(汉族),湖南祁东人,南华大学经济管理与法学学院,教授,博士,研究方向:物流与供应链管理、决策优化与风险管理,Email:757338274@qq.com.
E-mail:757338274@qq.com
ZOU Qing-ming, HU Li-qing, ZOU Ting-jun
Received:
2020-03-30
Revised:
2020-09-07
Online:
2022-10-20
Published:
2022-10-12
Contact:
邹清明
E-mail:757338274@qq.com
摘要: 供应链企业的公平关切是发展与维持良好供应链上下游合作关系的重要因素。面对消费者的低碳偏好与碳排放规制约束,供应链企业在确定最优定价与减排水平等运作决策时,常常表现较强的公平关切倾向。探究环保规制下公平关切如何影响供应链的运作决策,可以为供应链合作提供对策。本文在碳限额与碳交易机制下,研究了由公平关切制造商和公平关切零售商组成的低碳供应链的最优定价和碳减排率等决策,分析了公平关切对最优定价和碳减排水平及利润的影响,并讨论了收益共享-成本共担契约模型对供应链的协调性,最后通过数值仿真验证了主要结论。结果表明:(1)制造商和零售商都公平关切时,收益共享-成本共担契约的参数若满足一定条件,供应链可以实现协调。(2)批发价与制造商公平关切系数正相关,零售价与制造商和零售商公平关切系数都正相关;若制造商考虑零售商公平关切则批发价的变化取决于碳减排成本系数的大小,碳减排率与制造商和零售商的公平关切系数是负相关;若制造商忽视零售商的公平关切,则批发价仅受制造商自身公平关切的影响, 碳减排率与制造商公平关切负相关,与零售商公平关切无关。(3)制造商公平关切对双方利润具有负向影响,零售商公平关切对制造商利润也有负向影响,而零售商利润随自身公平关切的变化情况取决于制造商是否考虑其公平关切,若考虑则两者正相关,否则两者负相关。
中图分类号:
邹清明, 胡李庆, 邹霆钧. 碳限额与碳交易机制下考虑公平关切的供应链定价与协调研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(10): 142-154.
ZOU Qing-ming, HU Li-qing, ZOU Ting-jun. Pricing and Coordination of a Supply Chain with Fairness Concerns under Carbon Cap-and-Trade Mechanism[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(10): 142-154.
[1] 谢晶晶,窦祥胜.基于合作博弈的碳配额交易价格形成机制研究[J].管理评论,2016, 28(2):15-24.Xie Jingjing, Dou Xiangsheng. Carbon cap-and-trade pricing mechanism based on cooperative game theory[J]. Management Review, 2016,28(2): 15-24. [2] Zhang Jingjiang, Nie Tengfei, Du Shaofu. Optimal emission-dependent production policy with stochastic demand[J]. International Journal of Society Systems Science,2011,3(1): 21-39. [3] Abdallah T, Farhat A, Diabat A, et al. Green supply chains with carbon trading and environmental sourcing: Formulation and life cycle assessment[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2012, 36(9): 4271-4285. [4] Zakeri A, Dehghanian F, Fahimnia B. Carbon pricing versus emissions trading: A supply chain planning perspective[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2015, 164: 197-205. [5] Cong Jing, Pang Tao, Peng Hongjun. Optimal strategies for capital contraint low-carbon supply chain under yield uncertainty[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020, 256(20), DOI.org/10.1016/j.jcelepro.2020.120339. [6] Motlagh S M H, Ebrahimi S, Jokar A. Sustainable supply chain coordination under competition and green effort scheme[J].Journal of Operation Research Society, 2021, 72(2): 304-319. [7] 谢鑫鹏, 赵道致. 低碳供应链生产与交易决策机制[J]. 控制与决策, 2014, 29(4): 651-658.Xie Xinpeng, Zhao Daozhi. Low-carbon supply chain production and trading decision-making mechanism[J]. Control and Decision, 2014, 29(4): 651-658. [8] 陈晓红, 曾祥宇, 王傅强. 碳限额交易机制下碳交易价格对供应链碳排放的影响[J].系统工程理论与实践,2016,36(10):2562-2571.Chen Xiaohong, Zeng Xiangyu, Wang Fuqiang. Impacts of carbon trading price on carbon emission in supply chain under the cap-and-trade system[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2016,36(10):2562-2571. [9] 杨磊, 张琴, 张智勇. 碳交易机制下供应链渠道选择与减排策略[J]. 管理科学学报, 2017,20(11):75-87.Yang Lei, Zhang Qin, Zhang Zhiyong, Channel selection and carbon emission policies in supply chains with the cap-and-trade scheme[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2017,20(11):75-87. [10] 王道平, 李小燕, 赵亮. 碳交易机制下考虑制造商竞争的供应链协调研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018,27(4):62-71.Wang Daoping, Li Xiaoyan, Zhao Liang. Study on the coordination of supply chain based on carbon emissions trading considering the manufacturers competitions[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2018,27(04):62-71. [11] 路正南, 成思瑜, 朱新朗. 碳配额交易政策对供应链决策的影响研究[J]. 工业技术经济,2018, 37(8):109-116.Lu Zhengnan, Cheng Siyu, Zhu Xinlang. Decision of a two-echelon supply chain under cap-and-trade regulation[J]. Journal of Industrial Technology Economics, 2018, 37(8):109-116. [12] 夏良杰,孔清逸,李友东,等.考虑交叉持股的低碳供应链减排与定价决策[J]. 中国管理科学,2021,31(4):70-81.Xia Liangjie, Kong Qingyi, Li Youdong, et al. Emission reduction and pricing strategies of a low-carbon supply chain considering cross-Shareholding[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021,31(4):70-81. [13] 林志炳,鲍蕾.企业社会责任对供应链减排决策及政府补贴效率的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学,2021,29(11):111-121.Lin Zhibing, Bao Lei. Research about the effects of CSR on supply chain emission reduction decision-making and government subsidy efficiency[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021,29(11):111-121. [14] Kahneman D,Tversky A.Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk[J]. Econometrica, 1979, 47(2): 263-292. [15] Ruffle B J. More is better, but fair is fair: Tipping in dictator and ultimatum games[J]. Game and Economics Behavior,1993,23:247-265. [16] Zhou Yanju, Bao Maojing, Chen Xiaohong, et al. Co-op advertising and emission reduction cost sharing contracts and coordination in two-carbon supply chain based on fairness concerns[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 133: 402-413. [17] Cui H, Raju J S, Zhang J Z. Fairness and channel coordination[J]. Management Science 2007, 3(8):1303-1314. [18] Caliskan-Demirag O, Chen Y, Li J. Channel coordination under fairness concerns and nonlinear demand[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 207(3):1321-1326. [19] Katok E, Pavlov V. Fairness in supply chain contracts: A laboratory study[J]. Journal of Operations Management,2013,31:129-137. [20] Ho T H, Su X M, Wu Y Z. Distributional and peer-induced fairness in supply chain contract design[J]. Production and Operation Management, 2014,23(2):161-175. [21] 杜少甫, 杜婵, 梁樑, 等. 考虑公平关切的供应链契约与协调[J]. 管理科学学报, 2010, 13(11):41-48.Du Shaofu, Du Chan, Liang Liang, et al. Supply chian coordination considering fairness concerns[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2010,13(11): 41-48. [22] 浦徐进, 诸葛瑞杰, 包含. 零售商风险规避和公平关切对供应链运作的影响研究[J].软科学,2014,28(7):76-81.Pu Xujin, Zhuge Ruijie, Bao Han. Research on supply chain operation mechanisms with the considering of risk aversion and fairness preference of retailers[J]. Soft Science, 2014,28(7):76-81. [23] 李波, 李宜楠, 侯丽婷, 等. 具有公平关切的零售商对双渠道供应链决策影响分析[J]. 控制与决策,2015,5:955-960.Li Bo, Li Yinan, Hou Liting, et al. Impact of fair-minded retailer on decision of supply chain in dual channel[J]. Control and Decision, 2015, 5:955-960. [24] 柳键, 舒斯亮. 公平关切信息不对称下服务供应链的决策优化[J]. 控制与决策, 2016, 31(4):729-734.Liu Jian, Shu Siliang. Decision optimization of service supply chain based on information asymmetry of fairness concerns[J]. Control and Decision, 2016, 31(4): 729-734. [25] 陈章跃, 王勇, 陈晓旭. 制造商双向公平关切下闭环供应链的竞争分析[J]. 管理学报, 2016,13(5):772-780.Chen Zhangyue, Wang Yong, Chen Xiaoxu. The competition analysis of closed-loop supply chain under bidirectional fairness concerns of manufacturer[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2016, 13(5):772-780. [26] 邹清明, 叶广宇.考虑公平关切的双向双渠道闭环 供应链的定价决策[J].系统管理学报,2018, 27(2):281-290.Zou Qingming,Ye Guangyu. Price-making decision in a two-way dual-channel closed-loop supply chain considering fairness concerns[J]. Journal of System & Management, 2018, 27(2):281-290. |
[1] | 索玮岚, 张劲. 多元化集成模式下交通基础设施建设融资风险识别研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(10): 25-34. |
[2] | 邱虹, 朱南, 张霆. 基于现金闭环供应链中重复调运问题的协调机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(10): 177-186. |
[3] | 李峰, 朱平, 梁樑, 寇纲. 基于最近距离投影的DEA两阶段效率评价方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(10): 198-209. |
[4] | 刘德海, 赵悦, 张旭. 考虑信息搜索的环境污染群体性事件最优决策模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(8): 1-11. |
[5] | 蔡健平, 王晶, 焦子豪. 基于鲁棒优化的突发公共卫生事件精准筛查策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(7): 1-8. |
[6] | 徐选华, 马志鹏, 陈晓红. 基于公众偏好大数据分析的大群体应急决策质量动态演化研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(7): 140-149. |
[7] | 杜娟, 潘盟, 汪云峰. 基于成本优化的中国省际碳减排目标分配[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(7): 252-263. |
[8] | 万志远, 刘勤明, 叶春明, 刘文溢. 突发事件下的医院应急群决策模型研究*[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(6): 254-262. |
[9] | 马敬佩, 李文立. 盗版威胁下信息产品在线销售模式选择研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(5): 216-225. |
[10] | 王文隆, 姚锐, 张涑贤. 考虑制造商创新的供应链双向需求信息共享研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(5): 226-235. |
[11] | 曲薪池, 侯贵生, 孙向彦. 消费者异质偏好结构下动态创新竞合系统定价与创新策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(1): 88-99. |
[12] | 任爱俊, 冯耕中, 田军. 考虑恢复依赖的基础设施网络应急恢复决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(1): 154-164. |
[13] | 王伟明, 邓潇, 徐海燕. 基于三维密度算子的群体DEMATEL指标权重确定方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(12): 179-190. |
[14] | 姚升保, 古淼. 移情关系影响下的群体共识决策模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(11): 203-214. |
[15] | 金飞飞,刘金培,陈华友,杜鹏程. 基于信任关系和信息测度的概率语义社会网络群决策模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(10): 178-190. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
|