基于交叉效率DEA与群体共识的区间乘性语言偏好关系群决策

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.02.018

中国管理科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2): 190-198.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.02.018

基于交叉效率DEA与群体共识的区间乘性语言偏好关系群决策

刘金培^1,2, 杨宏伟¹, 陈华友³, 周礼刚³

1. 安徽大学商学院, 安徽合肥 230601;
2. 北卡罗莱纳州立大学工业与系统工程系, 美国罗利 27695;
3. 安徽大学数学科学学院, 安徽合肥 230601

收稿日期:2017-12-20 修回日期:2018-04-09 出版日期:2020-02-20 发布日期:2020-03-03
通讯作者: 刘金培(1984-),男(汉族),山东滨州人,安徽大学商学院,教授,博士,研究方向:预测与决策分析,E-mail:liujinpei2012@163.com. E-mail:liujinpei2012@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（71501002，71871001，61502003，71771001，71701001）；安徽省高校人文社科基金资助重点项目（SK2019A0013，SK2018A0605）

Group Decision Making with Interval Multiplicative Linguistic Preference Relations based on Cross-efficiency DEA and Group Consensus

LIU Jin-pei^1,2, YANG Hong-wei¹, CHEN Hua-you³, ZHOU Li-gang³

1. School of Business, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China;
2. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695, USA;
3. School of Mathematical Science, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China

Received:2017-12-20 Revised:2018-04-09 Online:2020-02-20 Published:2020-03-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对区间乘性语言偏好关系群决策问题，提出了一种基于交叉效率DEA和群体共识的群决策方法。首先，提出乘性语言偏好关系导出函数的定义，并构建产出导向的DEA模型，证明了一致性乘性语言偏好关系的DEA效率得分与排序向量之间存在比例关系。在此基础上，建立基于理想值的交叉效率DEA模型，提出乘性语言偏好关系的通用排序方法。同时，基于群体共识建立目标规划模型来计算各语言偏好关系的权重系数。最后，利用Monte Carlo随机模拟的方法对群体语言偏好空间进行统计分析，得到群决策期望排序向量及其可信度。算例分析表明本文方法能够有效的避免信息损失，具有较强的适用性和较高的可信度。

关键词: 群决策, 交叉效率DEA, 区间语言偏好关系, 群体共识, 随机模拟

Abstract: Group decision making with interval linguistic preference relations has attracted a great deal of attention in the literatures of management science. In order to obtain the group decision making result, the consistency of linguistic preference relations given by the decision makers need to be improved according to some existing approaches, so a variety of consistency adjustment methods have been proposed. However, these consistency adjustment methods of deriving acceptable consistent linguistic preference relation have changed the original evaluation information given by the decision makers, which may distort the given decision making information and make the decision result less reliable. Besides, some existing approaches transform the interval linguistic information into a simple linguistic evaluation value, which may cause the loss of decision information.
In order to resolve these problems, a novel approach is proposed to group decision making based on cross-efficiency DEA and group consensus with interval multiplicative linguistic preference relations. First, the definition of derived function of multiplicative linguistic preference relation is given and the output-oriented DEA model is constructed. It is proved that there is a proportional relationship between DEA efficiency scores and the ranking vector of the consistent multiplicative linguistic preference relation. Based on this, a cross-efficiency DEA model based on ideal value is developed. Then, a general ranking method for the multiplicative linguistic preference relation is proposed. Meanwhile, a goal programming model is established to obtain the weight coefficient of each linguistic preference relationship based on group consensus. Finally, the stochastic simulation method is used to statistical analysis of the group's preference space, and the group decision expected ranking vector and the confidence degree are obtained. The numerical results show that the proposed approach can effectively avoid information loss and is of great applicability and high credibility.
The problems of information distortion and loss in some existing group decision making methods are solved with interval linguistic preference relations, the relevant theories of group decision making is enriched, and a new technical framework for group decision making with interval multiplicative linguistic preference relations is provided.

Key words: group decision making, cross-efficiency DEA, interval linguistic preference relation, group consensus, stochastic simulation

中图分类号:

C934

刘金培, 杨宏伟, 陈华友, 周礼刚. 基于交叉效率DEA与群体共识的区间乘性语言偏好关系群决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(2): 190-198.

LIU Jin-pei, YANG Hong-wei, CHEN Hua-you, ZHOU Li-gang. Group Decision Making with Interval Multiplicative Linguistic Preference Relations based on Cross-efficiency DEA and Group Consensus[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(2): 190-198.

参考文献

[1] Herrera-Viedma E, Martinez L, Mata F, et al. A consensus support system model for group decision-making problems with multigranularlinguistic preference relations[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2005, 13(5):644-658.
[2] Dong Y, Li C C, Herrera F. An optimization-based approach to adjusting unbalanced linguistic preference relations to obtain a required consistency level[J]. Information Sciences, 2015, 292(5):27-38.
[3] Wang H, Xu Z. Interactive algorithms for improving incomplete linguistic preference relations based on consistency measures[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2016, 42:66-79.
[4] Jin F, Ni Z, Chen H, et al. Approaches to decision making with linguistic preference relations based on additive consistency[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2016, 49:71-80.
[5] Liu H, Cai J, Jiang L. On improving the additive consistency of the fuzzy preference relations based on comparative linguistic expressions[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2014, 29(6):544-559.
[6] 靳凤侠, 黄天民. 语言判断矩阵的一致性调整方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2013, 35(7):1472-1476.
[7] Yang W E, Ma C Q, Han Z Q,et al. Checking and adjusting order-consistency of linguistic pairwise comparison matrices for getting transitive preference relations[J]. Or Spectrum, 2016, 38(3):769-787.
[8] Tapia G J M, Moral M J, Martinez M A, et al. A consensus model for group decision making problems with linguistic interval fuzzy preference relations[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012, 39(11):10022-10033.
[9] Chen H, Zhou L, Han B. On compatibility of uncertain additive linguistic preference relations and its application in the group decision making[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2011, 24(6):816-823.
[10] Zhou L, Chen H. On compatibility of uncertain additive linguistic preference relations based on the linguistic COWA operator[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2013, 13(8):3668-3682.
[11] Zhou L, He Y, Chen H, et al. On compatibility of uncertain multiplicative linguistic preference relations based on the linguistic COWGA[J]. Applied Intelligence, 2014, 40(2):229-243.
[12] Xu J, Wu Z. A maximizing consensus approach for alternative selection based on uncertain linguistic preference relations[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2013, 64(4):999-1008.
[13] Meng F, An Q, Chen X. A consistency and consensus-based method to group decision making with interval linguistic preference relations[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2016, 67(11):1419-1437.
[14] Pang J, Liang J, Song P. An adaptive consensus method for multi-attribute group decision making under uncertain linguistic environment[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2017,58:339-353.
[15] 王洪波, 罗贺, 杨善林. 基于流形学习的非一致性判断矩阵排序方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(10):147-155.
[16] Xu Z. A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations[J]. Information Sciences, 2004, 166(1):19-30.
[17] Xu Z. An approach based on the uncertain LOWG and induced uncertain LOWG operators to group decision making with uncertain multiplicative linguistic preference relations[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2006, 41(2):488-499.
[18] Wang Y M, Chin K S. Some alternative models for DEA cross-efficiency evaluation[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2010, 128(1):332-338.

基于交叉效率DEA与群体共识的区间乘性语言偏好关系群决策

Group Decision Making with Interval Multiplicative Linguistic Preference Relations based on Cross-efficiency DEA and Group Consensus

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	刘培德, 滕飞. 基于共识模型和ORESTE的扩展概率语言多属性群决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(3): 199-209.
[2]	李磊, 张曙阳. 共识条件下最小最大妥协的直觉模糊数集结方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(2): 168-176.
[3]	王泽洲, 陈云翔, 项华春. 一种改进型专家模糊核聚类赋权方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(2): 177-183.
[4]	任嵘嵘, 孟一鸣, 李晓奇, 赵萌. 基于一致性度量的概率模糊语言多属性群决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(4): 220-230.
[5]	赵萌, 张晨曦, 胡亦奇, 李刚. 基于愿景满意度函数的多属性群决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(2): 220-230.
[6]	刘培德, 滕飞. 基于证据推理和广义Shapley值的扩展概率语言多属性群决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(11): 206-218.
[7]	罗世华, 刘俊. 改进排序的梯形直觉模糊Choquet Bonferroni算子的多属性群决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(1): 134-143.
[8]	许成磊, 段万春, 孙永河. 多属性群决策的混合结构偏好识别与融合方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(8): 139-145.
[9]	王中兴, 陈晶, 兰继斌. 基于二元语义Archimedean S-模集成算子的群决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(8): 146-153.
[10]	赵树平, 梁昌勇, 罗大伟. 基于VIKOR和诱导广义直觉梯形模糊Choquet积分算子的多属性群决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(6): 132-142.
[11]	杜娟, 霍佳震. 交互式多属性群决策评价方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(11): 120-128.
[12]	彭勃, 叶春明. 基于不确定纯语言混合调和平均算子的多属性群决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(2): 131-138.
[13]	易平涛, 李伟伟, 郭亚军. 泛综合评价信息集成框架求解算法及应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(10): 131-138.
[14]	陈晓红, 杨志慧. 基于改进模糊综合评价法的信用评估体系研究—以我国中小上市公司为样本的实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(1): 146-153.
[15]	刘小弟, 朱建军, 刘思峰. 方案有不确定偏好的区间数相对熵群决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(6): 134-140.