基于共识模型和ORESTE的扩展概率语言多属性群决策方法

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.0071

中国管理科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 199-209.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.0071

基于共识模型和ORESTE的扩展概率语言多属性群决策方法

刘培德, 滕飞

山东财经大学管理科学与工程学院, 山东济南 250014

收稿日期:2019-01-11 修回日期:2019-07-10 发布日期:2021-04-02
通讯作者: 滕飞(1990-),女(汉族),山东烟台人,山东财经大学管理科学与工程学院,预聘制副教授,博士,研究方向:决策理论与优化方法,E-mail:tf1049158564@163.com. E-mail:tf1049158564@163.com
作者简介:滕飞(1990-),女(汉族),山东烟台人,山东财经大学管理科学与工程学院,预聘制副教授,博士,研究方向:决策理论与优化方法,E-mail:tf1049158564@163.com.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（71771140）；山东省泰山学者工程专项经费资助项目（ts201511045）；山东省自然科学基金资助项目（ZR2020QG002）；山东省社会科学规划项目（20CSDJ23）

Multiple Attribute Group Decision-Making Method Based on Consensus Model and ORESTE Method for Extended Probabilistic Linguistic Term Set

LIU Pei-de, TENG Fei

School of Management Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Finance and Economic, Jinan 250014, China

Received:2019-01-11 Revised:2019-07-10 Published:2021-04-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 扩展概率语言词集作为一种更具通用性的语言信息表示模型，能够更加充分地描述原始评价信息，提高语言多属性决策的科学性。鉴于此，本文针对扩展概率语言环境下的多属性群决策问题，提出一种基于共识模型和ORESTE方法的多属性群决策方法。首先，给出了扩展概率语言词集的概念以及相关理论。其次，考虑到群决策过程中专家群体因知识背景以及素质能力的不同从而给出不同的评价信息导致群体意见不一致的情况，提出了扩展概率语言环境下的共识模型。再次，鉴于多数情况下备选方案间不存在单一排序顺序，本文对经典的ORESTE方法进行改进，提出扩展概率语言ORESTE方法。基于本文提出的扩展概率语言共识模型和扩展概率语言ORESTE方法，提出了扩展概率语言多属性群决策方法。最后，为了验证本文提出方法的有效性和合理性，采用共享单车设计方案评价算例进行分析，并通过与其他方法的对比分析说明本文提出方法的优越性。

关键词: 扩展概率语言词集, 共识模型, ORESTE方法, 多属性群决策

Abstract: As a more general linguistic information representation model, extended probabilistic linguistic term set can describe original evaluation more fully and improve scientificity of decision-making. With respect to group decision-making problems under extended probabilistic linguistic environment, the group decision-making method is propased based on consensus model and ORESTE method. Firstly, the concept and relative theories of extended probabilistic linguistic term set are given. Secondly, the consensus model under extend probabilistic linguistic environment is proposed to handle with different opinions from different groups. Thirdly, the extended probabilistic linguistic ORESTE method is developed to deal with decision-making problems where there is no single order between multiple alternatives. Based on this, a novel multiple attribute group decision-making method is proposed based on consensus model and ORESTE method. Lastly, a case study about shares bicycle design scheme is used to verify the validity and rationality of the proposed method. After that, the comparisons with other existing methods are further carried out to show its rationality and advantages.

Key words: extended probabilistic linguistic term set, consensus model, ORESTE method, multiple attribute group decision-making

中图分类号:

C934

刘培德, 滕飞. 基于共识模型和ORESTE的扩展概率语言多属性群决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(3): 199-209.

LIU Pei-de, TENG Fei. Multiple Attribute Group Decision-Making Method Based on Consensus Model and ORESTE Method for Extended Probabilistic Linguistic Term Set[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(3): 199-209.

参考文献

[1] Zadeh L A. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I[J]. Information Sciences, 1975, 8(3):199-249.
[2] Zadeh L A. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-II[J]. Information Sciences, 1975, 8(4):301-357.
[3] Zadeh L A.The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-III[J]. Information Sciences, 1975, 9(1):43-80.
[4] Xu Zeshui. Uncertain linguistic aggregation operators based approach to multiple attribute group decision making under uncertain linguistic environment[J]. Information Sciences, 2004, 168(1-4):171-184.
[5] Rodriguez R M, Martinez L, Herrera F. Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2012, 20(1):109-119.
[6] Chen Zhensong, Chin Kwaisang, Li Yanlai, et al. Proportional hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set for multiple criteria group decision making[J]. Information Sciences, 2016, 357:61-87.
[7] Zhang Guiqing, Dong Yucheng, Xu Yinfeng. Consistency and consensus measures for linguistic preference relations based on distribution assessments[J]. Information Fusion, 2014, 17:46-55.
[8] Pang Qi, Wang Hai, Xu Zeshui. Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making[J]. Information Sciences, 2016, 369:128-143.
[9] 吴志彬.群体共识决策理论与方法[M].北京:科学出版社, 2017.
[10] Hwang C L, Yoon K. Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications[M]. New York:Springer-Verlag, 1981.
[11] 朱佳翔,蔡建飞,林徐勋.基于CI-TOPSIS的梯形直觉模糊多准则群决策分类方法[J].中国管理科学,2018, 26(9):148-157.
[12] Opricovic S. Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems[J]. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade, 1998, 2(1):5-21
[13] 赵树平,梁昌勇,罗大伟.基于VIKOR和诱导广义直觉梯形模糊Choquet积分算子的多属性群决策方法[J].中国管理科学, 2016, 24(6):132-142.
[14] Vincke J P, Brans P. A preference ranking organization method. The PROMETHEE method for MCDM[J]. Management Science, 1985, 31(6):647-656.
[15] Roy B. Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples:La method ELECTRE[J]. R.I.R.O, 1968, 2(8):57-75.
[16] Roubens M. Preference relations on actions and criteria in multicriteria decision making[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1982, 10(1):51-55.
[17] Xu Zeshui,Luo S Q, Liao Huchang. A probabilistic linguistic PROMETHEE method and its application in medical service[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, in Press, 2017.
[18] Liu Peide, Li Ying. The PROMTHEE II method based on probabilistic linguistic information and their application to decision making[J]. Informatica, 2018, 29(2):303-320.

基于共识模型和ORESTE的扩展概率语言多属性群决策方法

Multiple Attribute Group Decision-Making Method Based on Consensus Model and ORESTE Method for Extended Probabilistic Linguistic Term Set

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 11

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	任嵘嵘, 孟一鸣, 李晓奇, 赵萌. 基于一致性度量的概率模糊语言多属性群决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(4): 220-230.
[2]	赵萌, 张晨曦, 胡亦奇, 李刚. 基于愿景满意度函数的多属性群决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(2): 220-230.
[3]	刘培德, 滕飞. 基于证据推理和广义Shapley值的扩展概率语言多属性群决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(11): 206-218.
[4]	罗世华, 刘俊. 改进排序的梯形直觉模糊Choquet Bonferroni算子的多属性群决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(1): 134-143.
[5]	许成磊, 段万春, 孙永河. 多属性群决策的混合结构偏好识别与融合方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(8): 139-145.
[6]	彭勃, 叶春明. 基于不确定纯语言混合调和平均算子的多属性群决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(2): 131-138.
[7]	刘德海, 于倩, 马晓南, 尹丹, 王维国. 基于最小偏差组合权重的突发事件应急能力评价模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(11): 79-86.
[8]	刘德海, 于倩, 马晓南, 尹丹, 王维国. 基于最小偏差组合权重的突发事件应急能力评价模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(11): 79-86.
[9]	丁勇, 梁昌勇, 朱俊红, 陆文星. 群决策中基于二元语义的主客观权重集成方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2010, 18(5): 165-170.
[10]	梁昌勇, 张恩桥, 戚筱雯, 陆青. 一种评价信息不完全的混合型多属性群决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2009, 17(4): 126-132.
[11]	龚本刚, 华中生, 檀大水. 一种语言评价信息不完全的多属性群决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2007, 15(1): 88-93.