主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2): 48-57.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.02.005

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

养老金统筹账户与个人账户最优组合策略研究

金博轶, 闫庆悦, 于文广   

  1. 山东财经大学保险学院, 山东 济南 250002
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-04 修回日期:2019-06-24 出版日期:2020-02-20 发布日期:2020-03-03
  • 通讯作者: 金博轶(1979-),男(汉族),陕西西安人,山东财经大学保险学院,教授,博士研究生,研究方向:养老保险精算,E-mial:20110983@sdufe.edu.cn. E-mail:20110983@sdufe.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(11301203);泰山学者工程专项经费资助项目(tsqn2016041);山东省高校科技计划项目(J18RA108)

Optimal Mix between Pay-as-you-go and Funding

JIN Bo-yi, YAN Qing-yue, YU Wen-guang   

  1. School of Insurance, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250002, China
  • Received:2017-09-04 Revised:2019-06-24 Online:2020-02-20 Published:2020-03-03

摘要: 本文使用投资组合理论对养老金统筹账户与个人账户的最优组合策略进行研究。为此,我们首先分析了确定性条件下的账户选择问题,然后,在随机假设下对不同账户的收益进行精算建模,在此基础上构建了养老金账户最优组合模型,最后,对上述模型进行了数值求解。研究表明:(1)统筹账户与个人账户的收益负相关,二者的组合能够形成一个有效的风险对冲机制;(2)混合制的有效边界在现收现付制和累积制的上方,因此,从风险-收益的角度讲,混合制优于单一养老金制度;(3)与最优账户组合相比,现行统筹账户的占比偏高,个人账户占比偏低。本文的政策含义在于,适当的降低现行统筹账户的占比,提高个人账户的占比能够降低养老金账户的风险水平,增加账户的收益。

关键词: 养老金, 现收现付制, 累积制, 投资组合

Abstract: For a long time, the choice of pension system has been the focus of theoretical and practical debate.Compared with single pension system, one of the purposes of introducing mixed pension system is to diversify risks. The main work of this paper is to study the optimal portfolio of different pension accounts from the perspective of risk and benefit.To this end, optimal account selection is analyzed first under deterministic conditions, then,a stochastic account revenue model is constructed.
In order to generate revenue scenarios of different accounts, mortality rate, fertility and return of assets are simulated based on Lee-Carter model, ARMA modeland CIR model, and thenthe classical Leslie population structure transition matrix is used to predict the change of population structure.On this basis, the revenuesof different pension accounts are calculated under different simulation scenarios.
Finally, the optimization technique is used to solve the portfolio model.The results show that:(1) the return of pay-as-you-gois negatively related to the return of funding, and the combination of the twosystems can form an effective risk hedging mechanism; (2) The efficient frontierof the mixed system is above the pay-as-you-go and funding, Therefore, from the risk-benefit perspective, mixed system is better than a single pension system; (3)Comparing with the optimalproportion of account,the current proportion of pay-as-you-go is higher, while the current proportion of the funding is low. The policy implication of this paper is that reducing the proportion of the current pay-as-you-go and increasing the proportion of funding can decrease the pension risks and increase income.

Key words: pension, pay-as-you-go, funding, portfolio theory

中图分类号: