CRMW风险缓释效用目标跟踪的债券投资组合优化策略研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.1726

中国管理科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (7): 150-163.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.1726

CRMW风险缓释效用目标跟踪的债券投资组合优化策略研究

杨瑞成, 邢伟泽

内蒙古财经大学金融学院，内蒙古呼和浩特010030

收稿日期:2019-10-30 修回日期:2020-02-03 出版日期:2022-08-05 发布日期:2022-08-05
通讯作者: 杨瑞成(1970-)，男(汉族)，山东潍坊人，内蒙古财经大学金融学院，教授，博士生导师，研究方向：金融风险管理，Email:yang-ruicheng@163.com E-mail:yang-ruicheng@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71761029)

Bond Portfolio Optimization Strategy with Target Tracking of CRMW Default Risk Mitigation Utility

YANG Rui-cheng, XING Wei-ze

School of Finance,Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics，Hohhot 010030, China

Received:2019-10-30 Revised:2020-02-03 Online:2022-08-05 Published:2022-08-05
Contact: 杨瑞成 E-mail:yang-ruicheng@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为缓释债券市场违约风险，央行着力推进信用风险缓释工具CRMW(信用风险缓释凭证)的发展，关于CRMW风险缓释能力度量及CRMW在债券投资组合中的应用成为了亟待解决的关键问题。为此，本文借鉴CVaR思想提出了“CRMW风险缓释效用”以度量CRMW对债券违约风险缓释能力，借助概率分位点理论定义债券的动态风险并制定了动态风险缓释跟踪目标，基于此跟踪目标探讨带有CRMW的债券投资组合优化策略问题。研究结果表明，在保证目标投资收益率的前提下，债券最优投资组合可达到风险缓释效用的目标，使其同时实现转移风险和保障收益的双重目的，且该投资组合优化策略表现出良好的抗风险性能。

关键词: 债券市场；CRMW；风险缓释效用；投资组合优化策略

Abstract: Since 2018, default events occurred frequently in the Chinese bond market. In this context, Credit Risk Mitigation Warrants (CRMW), sometimes called Chinese credit default swaps(CDS), was issued by the inter-banks bond market in China in 2018. The measurement of CRMW risk mitigation ability and the application of CRMW in the bond portfolio become the key issues to be solved urgently. The reduced model is introduced to measure the default probability of underlying bond, and the default intensity is driven by a two-factor CIR process. Applying State-space model and Kalman filter approaches, the related parameters of the CIR process are estimated according to a time series of historical prices of bonds and risk-free rate. Invoked by CVaR theory, the Default Risk Mitigation Utility (DRMU) of a CRMW is proposed to measure the ability that CRMW mitigates the default risk of underlying bond, and the dynamic risk of bonds with probability quantile is introduced. Given a tracking benchmark, the target of dynamic risk mitigation, a portfolio optimization policy is developed to reasonably utilize CRMW. Using the market data of CRMW and its underlying bonds, the behavior of the optimal portfolio is analyzed. The experiment results show that the optimized portfolio possesses a desired performance for different β quantile and a reasonable risk transfer ratio α, that is, under the premise of guaranteeing the investment return target, the optimal portfolio can achieve the target of dynamic risk mitigation. In addition, the portfolio optimization policy shows a better anti-risk performance. The higher the risk in the scenario, the more robust the optimized portfolio will be. Therefore, the proposed method in this paper can effectively measures the ability of CRMW to mitigate the default risk of underlying bonds,and provides an optimized portfolio strategy to mitigate the default risk of underlying bonds by using CRMW.

Key words: bond market; CRMW; default risk mitigation utility; portfolio optimization strategy

中图分类号:

F832.5

杨瑞成, 邢伟泽. CRMW风险缓释效用目标跟踪的债券投资组合优化策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(7): 150-163.

YANG Rui-cheng, XING Wei-ze. Bond Portfolio Optimization Strategy with Target Tracking of CRMW Default Risk Mitigation Utility[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(7): 150-163.

参考文献

［1］郭锐.完善 CRMW 制度建设［J］.中国金融,2019(3):65-66.Guo Rui. Perfect CRMW system construction［J］. China Finance, 2019(3):65-66.
［2］ Markowitz H. Portfolio selection［J］. Journal of Finance,1952,7(1): 77-91.
［3］ Roy A D. Safety first and the holding of assets［J］. Econometrica, 1952, 20(3): 431-449.
［4］ Bawa V S. Admissible portfolio for all individuals［J］. Journal of Finance, 1976, 31(4): 1169-1183.
［5］ Fishburn P C. Mean-risk analysis with risk associated with below-target returns［J］. American Economic Review, 1977, 67(2): 116-126.
［6］ Ghaoui L E, Oks M, Oustry F. Worst-case value-at-risk and robust portfolio optimization: A conic programming approach［J］. Operations Research, 2003, 51(4): 543-556.
［7］ Rockafellar R T, Uryasev S. Optimization of conditional value-at-risk［J］. The Journal of Risk, 2000, 2(3): 21-41.
［8］ Zhu S, Fukushima M. Worst-case conditional value-at-risk with application to robust portfolio management［J］.Operations Research, 2009, 57(5):1155-1168.
［9］ Natarajan K, Pachamanova D, Sim M. Incorporating asymmetric distributional information in robust value-at-risk optimization［J］. Management Science, 2008, 54(3):573-585.
［10］柴尚蕾，周鹏.基于非参数Copula-CVaR模型的碳金融市场集成风险测度［J］.中国管理科学，2019,27(8)：1-13.Chai Shanglei,Zhou Peng. Measuring the integrated risk of carbon financial market by a non-parametric Copula-cVaR model［J］.Chinese Journal of Management Science,2019,27(8)：1-13.
［11］ Roll R. A mean/variance analysis of tracking error［J］. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 1992, 18(4):13-22.
［12］ Philippe J. Portfolio optimization with tracking-error constraints［J］. Financial Analysts Journal, 2003, 59(5):70-82.
［13］ Gaivoronski A A, Krylov S, Wijst N V D. Optimalportfolio selection and dynamic benchmark tracking［J］.European Journal of Operational Research, 2005, 163(1):115-131.
［14］ Bajeux-Besnainou I, Belhaj R, Maillard D, et al. Portfolio optimization under tracking error and weights constraints［J］. Journal of Financial Research, 2011, 34(2):295-330.
［15］ Chen C, Kwon R H. Robust portfolio selection for index tracking［J］. Computers & Operations Research, 2012, 39(4):829-837.
［16］ Hull J C, White A D. Valuing credit default swaps II:Modeling default correlations［J］. The Journal of Deri-vatives Spring,2001,8(3):12-21.
［17］李鸿禧,迟国泰. 基于违约强度信用久期的资产负债优化模型［J］. 系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38(6):1387-1403.Li Hongxi, Chi Guotai. Optimization model of asset-liability portfolio based on credit duration and default intensity［J］. Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice, 2018, 38(6):1387-1403.
［18］ Bielecki T R, Jeanblanc M, Rutkowski M. Hedging ofa credit default swaption in the CIR default intensity model［J］. Finance & Stochastics, 2011, 15(3):541-572.
［19］巢文, 邹辉文. 基于双指数跳跃扩散模型的长寿债券定价研究［J］. 中国管理科学, 2017,25(9):50-56.Chao Wen, Zou Yaowen. Pricing longevity bonds based on double exponential jump diffusion model［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017,25(9):50-56.
［20］ CastagnaA, Fede F. Measuring and managing liquidity risk［M］.New Jersey: Wiley, 2013.
［21］ Schnbucher P J.Credit derivatives pricing models: Models, pricing and implementation［M］. New Jersey: Wiley, 2003.
［22］ Bolder D J. Affine term-structure models: Theory and implementation［R］. Staff Working Papers, 2001,31(1-15):214.
［23］ Rockafellar R T, Uryasev S.Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions［J］. Journal of Banking &Finance, 2002, 26(7):1443-1471.

[1]	黄顺武, 余霞光. IPO信息披露与监管的演化博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(6): 127-134.
[2]	于孝建, 程宇, 肖炜麟. 中国股市泡沫破裂临界时点动态置信区间研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(5): 41-53.
[3]	吴献博, 惠晓峰. 中国A股市场金融板块间风险相依关系及动态演化研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(5): 54-64.
[4]	朱光伟, 杨涛, 杜在超. 融资融券约束与股市波动[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(4): 13-29.
[5]	钟婉玲, 李海奇. 国际油价、宏观经济变量与中国股市的尾部风险溢出效应研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(2): 27-37.
[6]	张伟平, 庄新田, 王健. 中国股市跨行业系统性风险空间溢出关联及风险预测分析——基于尾部风险网络模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(12): 15-28.
[7]	张跃军, 张晗, 王金丽. 考虑结构变化和长记忆性的国际原油价格波动率预测研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(9): 54-64.
[8]	赵林海, 陈名智. 金融机构系统性风险溢出和系统性风险贡献——基于滚动窗口动态Copula模型双时变相依视角[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(7): 71-83.
[9]	金秀, 尘娜, 王佳. 安全投资转移视角下的跨行业投资组合模型及实证[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(11): 12-22.
[10]	严冠, 刘志东. 基于贝叶斯方法的中国商业银行同业借贷网络中系统风险研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(4): 14-26.
[11]	吴平, 恽钧超, 董斌. 基于多因子LIBOR模型的CMS数字范围债券定价[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(3): 132-141.
[12]	俞莹, 易荣华. 来自新兴市场的公司上市对目的地市场的影响——以中国香港市场为例[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(2): 37-47.
[13]	刘维奇, 李建莹. 媒体热议度能有效降低股价暴跌风险吗？——基于公司透明度调节作用的研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(11): 39-49.
[14]	柴尚蕾, 周鹏. 基于非参数Copula-CVaR模型的碳金融市场集成风险测度[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(8): 1-13.
[15]	唐勇, 朱鹏飞. 网贷市场利率与成交量关系研究——基于不同监管时期数据的实证分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(7): 35-45.

CRMW风险缓释效用目标跟踪的债券投资组合优化策略研究

Bond Portfolio Optimization Strategy with Target Tracking of CRMW Default Risk Mitigation Utility

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10