基于不同TPL权力的电商供应链决策研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.0811

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 第三方物流企业受到政府补贴的大力扶持，物流服务显著提升，对消费者网购产生积极影响，逐渐享有供应链话语权。通过分析物流服务供应商的物流成本结构，分别考虑物流投资与物流成本函数，从第三方物流供应链权力视角构建三种电商供应链物流外包权力结构场景(物流服务商主导模式、物流服务商次主导模式和物流服务商跟随模式)，综合研究第三方物流企业权力对电商物流外包供应链决策的影响。结果表明，当物流服务商权力越小时，物流服务水平、市场规模、制造商利润和网络零售商利润越大。而不同权力结构下的批发价格、零售价格、物流服务商利润关系受到物流投资系数和物流配送费用的共同影响。当满足条件时，物流服务商跟随模式使得供应链实现帕累托最优。不同第三方物流企业处于不同权力地位时，供应链利润均随物流配送费用的增加、物流投资系数的增加，物流成本系数的减小而增加。据此对不同的物流补贴政策效果进行分析，并为政策制定者和供应链主体提供参考性意见。

关键词: 电商供应链；第三方物流；权力结构；Stackelberg博弈

Abstract: Strongly supported by government subsidies, third-party logistics companies significantly improve logistics services to attract online orders for the right to speak in e-commerce supply chain. By analyzing cost structure of third-party logistics service provider, the total logistics cost is broken down into fixed investment cost and variable operation cost. Logistics service affects both market demand and variable operation cost. In our model, three power structure scenarios are considered based on different supply chain powers of third-party logistics service provider, namely service provider dominant mode, logistics service provider vice-dominant mode and logistics service provider following mode, to examine the impact of power structure on supply chain decision-making. Our results reveal that the power of third-party logistics service provider does have an influence on supply chain decisions in e-commerce logistics outsourcing supply chain. Specifically, the smaller power the third-party logistics service provider has, the greater the logistics service level, market size, manufacturer profit and online retailer profit would be. Besides, wholesale price, retail price, and logistics service provider's profit relationship under different power structures are jointly affected by the logistics investment coefficient and logistics distribution costs. Under certain conditions, the e-commerce logistics outsourcing supply chain reaches Pareto optimal solution. In addition, decreasing logistics service investment coefficient and increasing logistics service cost coefficient and unit logistics charge can positively enhance the logistics service level, market demand and profits of the manufacturer and e-retailer. Based on sensitivity analysis, the functions of two types of government subsidy incentives are studied so that suggestions can be provided for policy makers and supply chain parties.

Key words: e-commerce supply chain;third-party logistics; power structures; Stackelberg gaming

中图分类号:

刘仁军, 罗宇佳. 基于不同TPL权力的电商供应链决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(5): 156-166.

LIU Ren-jun, LUO Yu-jia. Research on E-commerce Supply Chain Decision Based on Different Supply Chain Powers of Third-Party Logistics Service Provider[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(5): 156-166.

参考文献

［1］刘紫玉,尹丽娟,袁丽娜.基于结构方程模型的物流服务因素对消费者网购意愿影响研究［J］.数学的实践与认识,2019,49(4):34-42.Liu Ziyu, Yin Lijuan, Yuan Lina. Research on the impact of logistics service factors on consumers’ online shopping intention based on structural equation modeling［J］. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2019, 49(4):34-42.
［2］刘志学,许泽勇. 基于非对称信息理论的第三方物流合作博弈分析［J］. 中国管理科学, 2003, 11(5):85-88.Liu Zhixue, Xu Zeyong. TPL cooperative game analysis based on the asymmetric information theory［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2003, 11(5): 85-88.
［3］ Wu Qing, Mu Yinping, Feng Yi. Coordinating contracts for fresh product outsourcing logistics channels with power structures［J］. International Journal of Production Economics, 2015, 160: 94-105.
［4］公彦德.主导模式、回收补贴对闭环供应链决策、稳定性和效率的影响［J］. 控制与决策,2013,28(8):1263-1267+1272.Gong Yande. Influence of dominant mode and recovery subsidy on decision-making, stability and efficiency of closed-loop supply chain［J］. Control and Decision, 2013,28(8): 1263-1267+1272.
［5］陈晓旭,王勇,孙海雷,等. 零售商主导下物流外包的三级供应链决策［J］. 系统工程学报, 2016, 31(2): 254-267.Chen Xiaoxu, Wang Yong, Sun Hailei, et al. Three level supply chain decision-making of logistics outsourcing under the guidance of retailers［J］. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2016, 31 (2): 254-267.
［6］陈晓旭,王勇,于海龙. 3PL参与的时变需求变质品三级供应链模型［J］. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(1): 65-73.Chen Xiaoxu, Wang Yong, Yu Hailong. A three-level supply chain model of deteriorating products with time-varying demand participated by 3PL［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22 (1): 65-73.
［7］王传涛,武泽艳,蔡晓菲. 物流服务水平影响市场需求下的三级供应链协调优化［J］. 物流技术,2015,34(15): 192-194.Wang chuantao, Wu Zeyan, Cai Xiaofei. Coordination and optimization of three-level supply chain under the influence of logistics service level on market demand［J］.Logistics Technology, 2015,34 (15): 192-194.
［8］ Cai Xiaoqiang, Chen Jian, Xiao Yongbo, et al. Fresh-product supply chain management with logistics outsourcing［J］. Omega, 2013, 41(4): 752-765.
［9］冯颖,张炎治. 不同权力结构下TPL服务增值的供应链决策与效率评价［J］. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(10): 164-175.Feng Ying, Zhang Yanzhi. Supply chain decision-making and efficiency evaluation of TPL service value-added under different power structures［J］ Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26 (10): 164-175.
［10］但斌, 吴庆, 张旭梅, 等. 第三方物流服务提供商与客户企业的共享节约合同［J］. 系统工程理论与实践, 2007,27(2): 46-53.Dan Bin, Wu Qing, Zhang Xuemei, et al. Shared-savings contracts between a third party logistics service provider and a client enterprise［J］. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2007,27(2): 46-53.
［11］王勇,李莉英. 需求依赖服务水平和价格的外包物流协调合同［J］. 系统工程学报, 2013, 28(6): 775-785.Wang Yong, Li Liying. Outsourcing logistics coordination contract whose demand depends on service level and price［J］ Journal of Systems Engineering, 2013, 28 (6): 775-785.
［12］周会军, 严伟, 何军良, 等. 不同主导力下两种政府补贴形式的低碳供应链决策［J］. 数学的实践与认识, 2018, 48(4): 79-89.Zhou Huijun, Yan Wei, He Junliang, et al. Low carbonsupply chain decision-making of two forms of government subsidies under different dominant forces［J］. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2018, 48(4): 79-89.
［13］夏文汇,宋文权. 基于回收物流成本的不同权力结构闭环供应链决策研究［J］. 重庆理工大学学报(社会科学), 2016, 30(9): 74-81.Xia Wenhui, Song Wenquan. Research on closed-loop supply chain decision-making with different power structures based on recovering logistics cost［J］. Journal of Chongqing University of Technology (Social Science), 2016, 30(9): 74-81.
［14］王玉燕,申亮. 基于消费者需求差异和渠道权力结构差异的MT-CLSC定价、效率与协调研究［J］. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(6): 34-42.Wang Yuyan, Shen Liang. Research on pricing, efficiency and coordination of MT-CLSC based on differences in consumer demand and channel power structure［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22(6): 34-42.
［15］付磊, 廖成林. 不同权力结构下的零售端物流外包竞争决策研究［J］. 系统科学与数学, 2017, 37(3): 756-767.Fu Lei, Liao Chenglin. Retail logistics outsourcing and the service competition of TPLS under different power structures［J］ Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2017, 37(3): 756-767.
［16］ Gupta S. Channel structure with knowledge spillovers［J］. Marketing Science, 2008, 27(2): 247-261.
［17］ Modak N M, Kazemi N, Cárdenas-Barrón L E. Investigating structure of a two-echelon closed-loop supply chain using social work donation as a corporate social responsibility practice［J］. International Journal of Production Economics, 2019, 207: 19-33.
［18］ Hu Jing, Hu Qiying, Xia Yusen. Who should invest in cost reduction in supply chains?［J］. International Journal of Production Economics, 2019, 207: 1-18.

[1]	杨晓荣, 杜荣. IT驱动的虚拟社区知识共享对跨境电商服务质量的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(2): 226-233.
[2]	魏瑾瑞, 王金伟. 在线评论回报的动态声誉机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(1): 252-262.
[3]	汪旭晖, 任晓雪. 政府治理视角下平台电商信用监管的动态演化博弈研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(12): 29-41.
[4]	常乐, 刘长玉, 于涛, 孙振凯. 社会共治下的食品企业失信经营问题三方演化博弈研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(9): 221-230.
[5]	胡春华, 赵慧, 童小芹, 任剑. 推荐系统对消费者网购支出的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(6): 158-170.
[6]	王崇, 陈大峰. O2O模式下消费者购买决策影响因素社群关系研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(1): 110-119.
[7]	王崇, 刘健, 吴价宝. 网络环境下消费者感知效用模型的构建与研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011, 19(3): 94-102.