知识链视角下开放式创新主体的联盟策略研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.0362

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 创新联盟是开放式创新的实践基础，选择适宜的合作伙伴缔结创新联盟是组织面对的重要决策问题。本文以组织间知识转移为线索，考虑一个由知识源、知识转化中介与信息服务机构组成的知识链，以知识产权交易为合作机制设计序贯博弈模型，分析了不同的联盟策略对组织的知识创造与创新收益的影响。研究表明：缔结创新联盟能够产生双赢效应，即同时提高联盟内部成员与非联盟成员的知识创造及创新收益；知识链在集中决策时的整体创新收益与知识创造均高于分散决策；由知识源与信息服务机构组建创新联盟是分散决策下知识链的最优联盟策略。研究结论有助于揭示开放式创新的知识转移对组织联盟策略的作用机理。

关键词: 开放式创新；创新联盟；知识转移；知识链

Abstract: Prior research on open innovation has found that extensive cooperation with diversified innovators is necessary for organizations to acquire external knowledge and enhance their innovation performance. Innovation alliance is a critical means of establishing and maintaining cooperative relationships. However, understanding the processes and outcomes of inter-organizational cooperation is not sufficient for explaining the formation mechanism of innovation alliance and sustained open innovation activities. Instead, some core partners usually act as important roles in the organization's open innovation practices. In the context of open innovation, how to choose appropriate partners to set up the innovation alliance is an important issue for organizations. Based on the perspective of inter-organizational knowledge transfer, a knowledge chain is constructed in this paper which is composed of a knowledge source, a knowledge transformation intermediary, and a third-party information service agency. A multi-stage sequential game model is designed by using the intellectual property contract as a cooperation mechanism, and the impact of the organization's alliance strategy on knowledge creation and innovation performance is analyzed.

Key words: open innovation; innovation alliance; knowledge transfer; knowledge chain

中图分类号:

F273.1

张华, 顾新, 王涛. 知识链视角下开放式创新主体的联盟策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(1): 263-274.

ZHANG Hua, GU Xin, WANG Tao. Organization’s Optimal Alliance Strategy in Open Innovation: A Knowledge Chain Perspective[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(1): 263-274.

参考文献

［1］ Chesbrough H. The era of open innovation［J］. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2003, 44(3): 35-41.
［2］ Lichtenthaler U. Open innovation: Past research, current debates, and future directions［J］. Academy of Management Perspectives, 2011, 25(1): 75-93.
［3］ Han K, Oh W, Im K S, et al. Value cocreation and wealth spillover in open innovation alliances［J］. MIS Quarterly, 2012, 36(1): 291-315.
［4］ Lauritzen G D, Karafyllia M. Perspective: leveraging open innovation through paradox［J］. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2019, 36(1): 107-121.
［5］ Hoffmann W H. Strategies for managing a portfolio of alliances［J］. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28(8): 827-856.
［6］ Degener P, Maurer I, Bort S. Alliance portfolio diversity and innovation: The interplay of portfolio coordination capability and proactive partner selection capability［J］. Journal of Management Studies, 2018, 55(8): 1386-1422.
［7］ Laursen K, Salter A J. The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration［J］. Research Policy, 2014, 43(5): 867-878.
［8］ Blankesteijn M, Jong F D, Bossink B. Closed-open innovation strategy for autonomous vehicle development［J］. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 2019, 19(1): 74-103.
［9］ Usman M, Vanhaverbeke W. How start-ups successfully organize and manage open innovation with large companies［J］. European Journal of Innovation Management, 2017, 20(1): 171-186.
［10］ Zobel A-K. Benefiting from open innovation: A multidimensional model of absorptive capacity［J］. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2017, 34(3): 269-288.
［11］ Huang Shufang, Chen Jin, Ye Weiwei, et al. The effect of external partner heterogeneity on open innovation: The moderating role of the technological regime［J］. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2019, 31(5): 593-605.
［12］王发明, 刘丹. 产业技术创新联盟中焦点企业合作共生伙伴选择研究［J］. 科学学研究, 2016, 34(2): 246-252.Wang Faming, Liu Dan. Research on the focal firm’s cooperation symbiotic partner selection of industrial technology innovation alliance［J］. Studies in Science of Science, 2016, 34(2): 246-252.
［13］万骁乐, 郝婷婷, 戎晓霞, 等. 共创视角下考虑开放式创新的供应链价值创造研究［J］. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(7): 57-66.Wan Xiaole, Hao Tingting, Rong Xiaoxia, et al. Supply chain value creation considering open innovation from the perspective of co-creation［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017, 25(7): 57-66.
［14］杜欣, 邵云飞. 基于联盟间知识互动关系的联盟组合策略研究［J］. 预测, 2017, 36(6): 69-74.Du Xin, Shao Yunfei. Research on the knowledge interaction and portfolio strategy in alliance portfolio［J］. Forecasting, 2017, 36(6): 69-74.
［15］ Caner T, Tyler B B. The effects of knowledge depth and scope on the relationship between R&D alliances and new product development［J］. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2015, 32(5): 808-824.
［16］吴洁, 吴小桔, 车晓静, 等. 中介机构参与下联盟企业知识转移的三方利益博弈分析［J］. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(10): 176-186.Wu Jie, Wu Xiaoju, Che Xiaojing, et al. Interests gaming analysis of knowledge transfer among three parties based on the participation of intermediary organization［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(10): 176-186.
［17］ Jiang Zhangsheng, Hu Longying, Chen Keke. Decisions of knowledge transfer in technology innovation alliance: A stackelberg leader-followers model［J］. Operational Research, 2010, 10(2): 231-242.
［18］王智生, 李慧颖. 基于Stackelberg博弈的R&D联盟知识转移决策模型［J］. 科研管理, 2016, 37(6): 74-83.Wang Zhisheng, Li Huiying. A knowledge transfer decision model of R&D alliance based on the Stackelberg game［J］. Science Research Management, 2016, 37(6): 74-83.
［19］ Morreale A, Robba S, Lo Nigro G, et al. A real options game of alliance timing decisions in biopharmaceutical research and development［J］. European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 261(3): 1189-1202.
［20］ Hora M, Dutta D K. Entrepreneurial firms and downstream alliance partnerships: Impact of portfolio depth and scope on technology innovation and commercialization success［J］. Production and Operations Management, 2013, 22(6): 1389-1400.
［21］ Battistella C, Toni A F D, Pillon R. Inter-organisational technology/knowledge transfer: A framework from critical literature review［J］. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2016, 41(5): 1195-1234.
［22］ Landry R, Amara N, Cloutier J S, et al. Technology transfer organizations: Services and business models［J］. Technovation, 2013, 33(12): 431-449.
［23］顾新, 吴绍波, 全力. 知识链组织之间的冲突与冲突管理研究［M］. 成都: 四川大学出版社, 2011.Gu Xin, Wu Shaobo, Quan Li. Research on conflict and conflict management among knowledge chain organizations［M］. Chengdu: Sichuan University Press, 2011.
［24］ Un C A, Asakawa K. Types of R&D collaborations and process innovation: The benefit of collaborating upstream in the knowledge chain［J］. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2015, 32(1): 138-153.
［25］ Crama P, De Reyck B, Taneri N. Licensing contracts: Control rights, options, and timing［J］. Management Science, 2017, 63(4): 1131-1149.
［26］ Ge Zehui, Hu Qiying, Xia Yusen. Firms’ R&D cooperation behavior in a supply chain［J］. Production and Operations Management, 2014, 23(4): 599-609.
［27］ Savaskan R C, Bhattacharya S, Wassenhove L N V. Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing［J］. Management Science, 2004, 50(2): 239-252.
［28］易余胤. 具广告效应的闭环供应链协调性能研究［J］. 中国管理科学, 2013, 21(2): 76-83.Yi Yuyin. Coordination performance of closed-loop supply chain with advertising effect［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2013, 21(2): 76-83.
［29］ d'Aspremont C, Jacquemin A. Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers［J］. American Economic Review, 1988, 78(5): 1133-1137.
［30］ Nash Jr J F. The bargaining problem［J］. Econometrica, 1950, 18(2): 155-162.
［31］ Bhaskaran S R, Krishnan V. Effort, revenue, and cost sharing mechanisms for collaborative new product development［J］. Management Science, 2009, 55(7): 1152-1169.
［32］郑本荣, 杨超, 杨珺. 回收渠道竞争下制造商的战略联盟策略选择［J］. 系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38(6): 1479-1491.Zheng Benrong, Yang Chao, Yang Jun. Manufacturer’s optimal alliance strategy in closed loop supply chains in the presence of competing recycling channels［J］. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2018, 38(6): 1479-1491.
［33］ Tan J. Accenture: True partnership is the key to our success with IBM［EB/OL］.［2018-07-06］. https://www.ibm.com/blogs/business-partners/page/18.
［34］ Cao Zhi, Lumineau F. Revisiting the Interplay between contractual and relational governance: A qualitative and meta-analytic investigation［J］. Journal of Operations Management, 2015, 33: 15-42.

[1]	解学梅, 朱琪玮. 创新支点还是保守枷锁：绿色供应链管理实践如何撬动企业绩效？[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(5): 131-143.
[2]	宋杰珍, 常健聪. 考虑道德风险与货损追溯的物流货损控制合约设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(6): 168-178.
[3]	海江涛, 李旭. 需求不确定情况下绿色产品消费过程中政府的最优补贴[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(5): 180-189.
[4]	苏媛, 李广培. 绿色技术创新能力、产品差异化与企业竞争力——基于节能环保产业上市公司的分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(4): 46-56.
[5]	甘柳, 罗鹏飞, 杨招军. 运营滞后与信用担保互换下的项目投资决策模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(3): 22-32.
[6]	鄢仁秀, 汪贤裕. 零售商主导型供应链中的知情委托方赊销契约机制设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(11): 85-93.
[7]	曹裕, 李青松, 李业梅. 技术贸易壁垒对食品企业技术选择决策影响的博弈研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(8): 184-196.
[8]	宋杰珍, 黄有方, 谷金蔚. 信息对称与非对称环境下基于补偿合约的物流能力协调研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(6): 71-81.
[9]	徐辉, 侯建明. 需求不确定条件下的制造商订单分配模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(3): 80-88.
[10]	王丽丽, 陈国宏. 供应链式产业集群技术创新博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(1): 151-158.
[11]	游达明, 杨晓辉, 朱桂菊. 多主体参与下企业技术创新模式动态选择研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(3): 151-158.
[12]	张春辉, 陈继祥. 考虑内生溢出与R&D投入的创新模式选择[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011, 19(3): 26-32.
[13]	余福茂, 王富忠, 沈祖志. 一类产品质量成本优化问题的研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2008, 20(6): 41-45.
[14]	卢锐, 盛昭瀚. 核心资源与企业孵化器的创新[J]. 中国管理科学, 2002, (2): 71-75.