基于心理承受能力假说的供应链信息共享模型

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.10.013

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对期望效用理论和前景理论对禀赋穹顶效用的忽视，提出了禀赋相关的心理承受能力假说，并以企业共享信息价值指数作为决策变量，构建了供应链信息共享的短板优化模型。根据该模型，可以通过不断提升短板企业的信息共享价值指数，达到最终实现整个供应链的信息共享。研究显示，供应链上企业信息共享价值指数与信息共享成功率之间存在正向关系，而与心理脆弱度成本弹性、社会风险水平、信息共享成本之间存在负向关系。本文的主要理论贡献一是将收入成本比引入到投资价值的制约因素集之中，强调投资收益率或者利润率的决定性作用；二是引入心理承受临界点概念，指出投资行为在该临界点的两侧表现出截然不同的特征。这一结果可以用于设计推进供应链信息共享的政策途径。

关键词: 供应链, 信息共享, 价值指数, 心理承受能力

Abstract: Against expected utility theory and prospect theory's neglect of endowment, psychological endurance hypothesis is proposed, and a short slab optimizing model of information sharing in supply chain that taking firm's information-sharing value index as the decisionvariable is built in this paper. The model implies that the information sharing in the whole supply chain would be achieved eventually by boosting the information-sharing value index of the last firm in the chain. The results also showed that the firm's information sharing-value index has a positive relationship with the information sharing success rate,but a negative relationship with the cost elasticity of psychological vulnerability, the social risk level and the information sharing cost. The contribution of this paper is to draw the farebox recovery ratio into the constraint factors of the investment value, emphasizing the decisive role of the investment return or profit margin; and to introduce the concept of psychological endurance threshold and point out that the investment behavior has different performance between under and above the threshold.These findings could be used to design the policiesfor promoting the information sharing in supply chain.

Key words: supply chain, information sharing, value index, psychological endurance

中图分类号:

F224

高锡荣, 罗扬. 基于心理承受能力假说的供应链信息共享模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(10): 117-123.

GAO Xi-rong, LUO Yang. The Information Sharing Model in Supply Chain Based on the Psychological Endurance Hypothesis[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(10): 117-123.

参考文献

[1] 陈长彬,缪立新.供应链弹性契约下的信息共享激励[J].当代经济管理,2010,32(1):23-28.

[2] 桑圣举,张强.模糊需求下n级供应链的收益共享契约机制研究[J].中国管理科学,2013,21(3):127-136.

[3] 肖迪,潘可文.基于收益共享契约的供应链质量控制与协调机制[J].中国管理科学,2012,20(4):68-73.

[4] 徐伟,郑石桥,陈丹萍.闭环供应链中制造商与销售商合作创新模型研究[J].中国管理科学,2014,22(7):116-123.

[5] 张子刚,周永红.供应链中利益相关者信息共享的合作博弈分析[J].科技管理研究,2004,24(3):114-116.

[6] 邓卫华,易明,蔡根女.供应链成员信息共享技术策略博弈分析[J].中国管理科学,2009,17(4):103-108.

[7] Ge Y,Yang J B,Proudlove N,et al.System dynamics modelling for supply-chain management:A case study on a supermarket chain in the UK[J].International Transactions in Operational Research,2004,11(5):495-509.

[8] Lin Zhong,Tsao D B.On the evaluation of downstream information sharing[J].Journal of Japan Industrial Management Association,2006,56(6):413-420.

[9] 马新安,张列平,田澎.供应链中的信息共享激励:动态模型[J].中国管理科学,2001,9(1):19-24.

[10] 孙凯,刘人怀.基于信息处理理论的跨组织信息共享策略分析[J].管理学报,2013,10(2):293-298.

[11] 叶飞,陈晓明,林强.基于决策者风险规避特性的供应链需求信息共享价值分析[J].管理工程学报,2012,26(3):176-183,196.

[12] 廖诺,李小燕,吴菊华.供应链间横向竞合战略对信息共享和创新绩效的影响研究[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(13):27-33.

[13] 肖群,马士华.信息不对称对闭环供应链MTO和MTS模式的影响研究[J].中国管理科学,2016,24(5):139-148.

[14] Samar K M,Yue Xiaohang,Zhu Xiaowei.A Stackelberg model of pricing of complementary goods under information asymmetry[J].International Journal of Production Economics,2009,134(2):424-433.

[15] 张玉林,陈剑.供应链中基于Stackelberg博弈的信息共享协调问题研究[J].管理工程学报,2004,(3):118-120.

[16] 周雄伟,马费成.需求不确定环境下的供应链信息共享激励模型[J].管理工程学报,2010,(4):122-126.

[17] von Neumann J L,von Morgenstern O.The theory of games and economic behavior[M].Princeton:Princeton University Press,1944.

[18] Simon H A.Rational choice and the structure of the environment[J].Psychological Review,1956,63(2):129-138.

[19] Kahneman D,Tversky A.Prospecttheory:An analysis of decision making under risk[J].Econometrica,1979,47(2):263-291.

[20] Tversky A,Kahneman D.Advances inprospect theory:Cumulative representation of uncertainty[J].Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,1992,5(4):297-323.

[21] Wu G,Gonzalez R.Curvature of the probability weighting function[J].Management Science,1996,42(12):1676-1690.

[22] Cabantous L,Ditzler C.Is probability weighting sensitive to the quality of probablilistic information? An experimental investigation on the impact of vagueness and conflict on probabilistic weighting functions[C]//Proceedings of 2004 North American Regional Meeting,University of Strasbourg,Tucson,France,2004:1-26.

[23] Festjens A,Sabrina B,Enrico D,et al.Time-based versus money-based decision making under risk:An experimental investigation[J].Journal of Economic Psychology,2015,50:52-72.

[24] Najam U.Dissertation abstract:The effect of involvement,time,and vividness on consumers' value judgments:A test of prospect theory[J].Experimental Economics,2006,9(2):177-178.

[25] Charles X W,Webster S T,Zhang Sidong.Newsvendor models with alternative risk preferences within expected utility theory and prospect theory frameworks[M]//Choi TMJ.Handbook of Newsvendor Problems New Yor:Springer,2012:177-196.

[26] Li L.Information sharing in a supply chain with horizontal competition[J].Management Science,2002,48(9):1196-1212.

[27] 钟哲辉.供应链信息共享模型及其优化研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2010.

[28] 王庆,陈果,刘敏.基于价值-风险双准则的风险决策理论[J].中国管理科学,2014,22(3):42-50.