三元效率区间下决策单元的全局绩效评价

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.02.019

中国管理科学 ›› 2016, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (2): 153-161.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.02.019

三元效率区间下决策单元的全局绩效评价

范建平^1,2, 陈静¹, 吴美琴¹, 田璇¹

1. 山西大学经济与管理学院, 山西太原 030006;
2. 山西大学科学评价研究中心, 山西太原 030006

收稿日期:2013-12-01 修回日期:2014-12-25 出版日期:2016-02-20 发布日期:2016-02-25
通讯作者: 范建平 E-mail:fjp@sxu.edu.cn
作者简介:范建平(1975-),男(汉族),山西武乡人,山西大学经济与管理学院,博士,副院长,研究方向:预测、评价与决策,E-mail:fjp@sxu.edu.cn.

Overall Performance Evaluation for DMUs with Ternary Efficiency Interval

FAN Jian-ping^1,2, CHEN Jing¹, WU Mei-qin¹, TIAN Xuan¹

1. School of Economics and Management, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China;
2. Research Center for Science Evaluation, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China

Received:2013-12-01 Revised:2014-12-25 Online:2016-02-20 Published:2016-02-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对现实生活中投入产出数据的不确定性,许多学者提出从乐观和悲观角度计算决策单元的效率区间,但每个效率区间的上、下界值都是决策单元表现的两种极端情况。本文通过引入心态指标衡量决策者的偏好,获得了一个最有可能的效率值,它与上界值、下界值共同组成了三元效率区间。然后改进了两级排序方法:提出了三元有向距离指数,为所有决策单元获得全序化结果。本文引用前人文中的数例验证了该方法是一种更为精确、可全序化的评价、决策方法,可广泛应用于效率测评中。

关键词: 数据包络分析, 三元效率区间, 乐观效率, 悲观效率, 三元有向距离指数

Abstract: To deal with the uncertainty of the data for input and/or output in the real world, many experts presented efficiency interval to evaluate the performance for each DMU from optimistic and pessimistic views. Undeniably, the lower and upper bound of the efficiency interval are two extremes of each DMU performance. In this paper, the preference of the decision makers are considered by introducing the attitude index to get the most probable efficiency value, which with the lower and upper bound constitutes the ternary efficiency interval. Then ternary directional distance index is proposed, improving the two-grade ranking method, to get a full ranking for all DMUs. The illustrative example shows this method is more precise and widely used in efficiency evaluation and decision-making field.the effectiveness and practicability of the proposed method.

Key words: data envelopment analysis, ternary efficiency interval, optimistic efficiency, pessimistic efficiency, ternary directional distance index

中图分类号:

范建平, 陈静, 吴美琴, 田璇. 三元效率区间下决策单元的全局绩效评价[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(2): 153-161.

FAN Jian-ping, CHEN Jing, WU Mei-qin, TIAN Xuan. Overall Performance Evaluation for DMUs with Ternary Efficiency Interval[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(2): 153-161.

参考文献

[1] Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J]. European journal of operational research, 1978, 2(6):429-444.

[2] 王赫一,张屹两.两阶段DEA前沿面投影问题研究-兼对我国上市银行运营绩效进行评价[J].中国管理科学,2012,20(2):114-120.

[3] Yang Xiaopeng, Morita H. Efficiency improvement from multiple perspectives:An application to Japanese banking Industry[J]. Omega, 2012, 41(3):501-509.

[4] Azizi H, Wang Yingming. Improved DEA models for measuring interval efficiencies of decision-making units[J]. Measurement, 2012, 46(3):1325-1332.

[5] 汪克亮,杨宝臣,杨力.中国省际能源利用的环境效率测度模型与实践研究[J].系统工程,2011,29(1):8-15

[6] Azizi H. A note on data envelopment analysis with missing values:an interval DEA approach[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2013,66(9):1817-1823.

[7] 赵萌.中国制造业生产效率评价:基于并联决策单元的动态DEA方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2012,32(6):1251-1260.

[8] 杜娟,霍佳震.基于数据包络分析的中国城市创新能力评价[J].中国管理科学,2014,22(6):85-93.

[9] Cook W D, Zhu J. Within-group common weights in DEA:An analysis of power plant efficiency[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 178(1):207-216.

[10] Banker R D, Charnes A, Cooper W W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis[J]. Management science, 1984, 30(9):1078-1092.

[11] Parkan C, Wang Yingming. The worst possible relative efficiency analysis based on inefficient production frontier. Working Paper, Department of Management Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, 2000.

[12] Doyle J R, Green R H, Cook W D. Upper and lower bound evaluation of multiattribute objects:Comparison models using linear programming[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1995, 64(3):261-273.

[13] Entani T, Maeda Y, Tanaka H. Dual models of interval DEA and its extension to interval data[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 136(1):32-45.

[14] Wang Yingming, Yang Jianbo. Measuring the performances of decision-making units using interval efficiencies[J]. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2007, 198(1):253-267.

[15] Azizi H, Wang Yingming. Improved DEA models for measuring interval efficiencies of decision-making units[J]. Measurement, 2013, 46(3):1325-1332.

[16] Azizi H, Jahed R. Improved data envelopment analysis models for evaluating interval efficiencies of decision-making units[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2011, 61(3):897-901.

[17] Wang Yingming, Chin K S, Yang Jianbo. Measuring the performances of decision-making units using geometric average efficiency[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2006, 58(7):929-937.

[18] Amirteimoori A. DEA efficiency analysis:Efficient and anti-efficient frontier[J]. Applied mathematics and Computation, 2007, 186(1):10-16.

[19] 陆志鹏,王洁方,刘思峰,等.区间DEA模型求解算法及其在项目投资效率评价中的应用[J].中国管理科学,2009,17(4):165-169.

[20] Wu Jie, Sun Jiasen, Song Malin, et al. A ranking method for DMUs with interval data based on dea cross-efficiency evaluation and topsis[J]. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2013,22(2):191-201.

[21] Wang Yingming, Greatbanks R, Yang Jianbo. Interval efficiency assessment using data envelopment analysis[J]. Fuzzy sets and Systems, 2005, 153(3):347-370.

[22] Azizi H, Ajirlu H G. Measurement of the worst practice of decision-making units in the presence of non-discretionary factors and imprecise data[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2011, 35(9):4149-4156.

[23] 胡启洲,张卫华. 区间数理论研究及其应用[M]. 北京:科学出版社. 2010.

[24] Qian Yuhua, Liang Jiye, Dang Chuangyin. Interval ordered information systems[J]. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 2008, 56(8):1994-2009.

[25] 宋鹏. 基于序化机理的稳健型股票价值投资研究. 太原:山西大学, 2012.

[26] Wang Yingming, Luo Ying, Liang Liang. Fuzzy data envelopment analysis based upon fuzzy arithmetic with an application to performance assessment of manufacturing enterprises[J]. Expert systems with applications, 2009, 36(3):5205-5211.

三元效率区间下决策单元的全局绩效评价

Overall Performance Evaluation for DMUs with Ternary Efficiency Interval

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	王昱, 杨珊珊. 考虑多维效率的上市公司财务困境预警研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(2): 32-41.
[2]	夏琼, 杨峰, 吴华清. “三重底线”下中国商业银行经营效率及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(8): 26-36.
[3]	王恰. 额外资源按需分配方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(6): 206-216.
[4]	金飞飞, 倪志伟, 陈华友, 朱旭辉, 武文颖. 基于一致性局部调整算法和DEA的语言偏好决策模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(12): 152-163.
[5]	伊茹, 马占新. 只有输出的广义样本区间DEA模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(1): 194-204.
[6]	谷晓燕, 何锋. 风险条件下研发项目改进DEA选择模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(7): 47-54.
[7]	刘文丽, 王应明, 吕书龙. 基于交叉效率和合作博弈的决策单元排序方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(4): 163-170.
[8]	杜涛, 冉伦, 李金林, 曹雪丽. 基于效率的组织多属性决策及实证研究：DEA-TOPSIS组合方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(7): 153-162.
[9]	成达建, 薛声家. 基于交叉效率新计算方法的区间效率值排序[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(7): 191-196.
[10]	陶杰, 卢超. 整数DEA问题的求解方法与改进[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(6): 151-160.
[11]	周忠宝, 金倩颖, 曾喜梅, 吴乾, 刘文斌. 存在基数约束的投资组合效率评价方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(2): 174-179.
[12]	冯晨鹏, 王慧玲, 毕功兵. 存在多种非期望产出的非径向零和收益DEA模型我国区域环境效率实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(10): 42-51.
[13]	王有森, 许皓, 卞亦文. 工业用水系统效率评价:考虑污染物可处理特性的两阶段DEA[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(3): 169-176.
[14]	王美强, 李勇军. 具有双重角色和非期望要素的供应商评价两阶段DEA模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(12): 91-97.
[15]	木仁, 马占新, 文宗川. 数据包络分析方法中决策单元偏序关系的建立[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(11): 103-108.