两层级分散决策供应链库存转运问题研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.01.009

中国管理科学 ›› 2016, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (1): 76-81.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.01.009

两层级分散决策供应链库存转运问题研究

邵婧

对外经济贸易大学国际商学院, 北京 100029

收稿日期:2013-08-05 修回日期:2014-01-27 出版日期:2016-01-20 发布日期:2016-01-28
通讯作者: 邵婧(1978-),女(汉族),天津人,对外经济贸易大学商学院管理学系,副教授,博士,研究方向:供应链管理、博弈论应用,E-mail:shaojing@uibe.edu.cn. E-mail:shaojing@uibe.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71301025);对外经济贸易大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(15JQ03);中国企业“走出去”协同创新中心(201501YY002B);对外经济贸易大学学科建设专项经费资助(XK2014201);教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金;教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-10-0336)

Impact of Transshipment on a Decentralized Supply Chain

SHAO Jing

Business School, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China

Received:2013-08-05 Revised:2014-01-27 Online:2016-01-20 Published:2016-01-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文考虑一个由制造商及分散决策零售商构成的两层级供应链,研究了库存转运对供应链各方利润的影响。通过构建博弈模型并推导子博弈完美纳什均衡,确定了制造商及零售商的最优决策水平,并确定供应链各方在库存转运下利润提高和降低的条件。理论分析显示,制造商及零售商利润增减均由转运价格决定,转运价格阈值则受临界分位点水平影响。最后给出了零售商进行库存转运的供应链协调契约。

关键词: 库存转运, 分散决策供应链, 博弈论模型, 供应链协调

Abstract: Transshipment occurs frequently in retailing industry and has a great impact on profits of supply chain firms. In this paper the impact of transshipment on a decentralized supply chain is examined. A game theoretic model is set up; under uniformly distributed demand, the Subgame Perfect Nash Equilibrium is analytically obtained. Specifically, retailers' inventory and the manufacturer's wholesale price at equilibrium is obtained. Then conditions under which a manufacturer and retailers in a decentralized supply chain are better off or worse off from transshipment are shown. Thresholds in the transshipment price such that the manufacturer is indifferent whether retailers tranship or not are calculated. How these thresholds depend on the critical fractile as well as the salvage value of leftover inventory is also shown. Finally, contracts that achieve coordination in a decentralized supply chain where retailers transship are constructed. Results of the paper can help managers in a decentralized supply chain to make decisions on transshipment under various situations.

Key words: transshipment, decentralized supply chains, game theoretic model, supply chain coordination

中图分类号:

F253.4

邵婧. 两层级分散决策供应链库存转运问题研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(1): 76-81.

SHAO Jing. Impact of Transshipment on a Decentralized Supply Chain[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(1): 76-81.

参考文献

[1] Dong Lingxiu, Rudi N. Who benefits from transshipment? Exogenous vs. endogenous wholesale prices [J]. Management Science, 2004, 50(5):645-657.

[2] Krishnan K S, Rao V R K. Inventory control in N warehouses [J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering, 1965, 16(3) :212-215.

[3] Karmarkar U S. The multilocation multiperiod inventory problem: Bounds and approximations [J]. Management Science, 1987, 33(1):86-94.

[4] Robinson L W. Optimal and approximate policies in multiperiod, multilocation inventory models with transshipments [J]. Operations Research, 1990, 38(2):278-295.

[5] Rudi N, Kapur S, Pyke D F. A two-location inventory model with transhipment and local decision making [J]. Management Science, 2001, 47(12) :1668-1680.

[6] Hu Xinxin, Duenyas I, Kapuscinski R. Existence of coordinating transshipment prices in a two-location inventory model [J]. Management Science, 2007, 53(8) :1289-1302.

[7] Li Jiang, Anupindi R. Customer-driven vs. retailer-driven search: Channel performance and implications [J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2010, 12(1) :102-119.

[8] 黄朔, 陈剑. 关于一种销售合作方式的研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2003, 11(10):199-203.

[9] 薄旭, 许保光. 基于风险厌恶的下游供应链转运问题研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2009, 18(6):19-25.

[10] 钱宇, 陈剑. 供应链中考虑下游转运的订货和定价决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2008, 16(1) :53-59.

[11] Shao Jing, Krishnan H, McCormick S T. Incentives for transshipment in a supply chain with decentralized retailers [J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2011, 13(3) :361-372.

[12] Petruzzi N, Dada M. Pricing and the newsvendor problem: A review with extensions [J]. Operations Research March, 1999, 47(2) :183-194.

[13] Cachon G P. Supply chain coordination with contracts [M]//de kok A G, Graves S G.Handbooks in operations research and management sciencevolume11:Supply chain management:Design, coorolination and operations. North Holland, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2003:227-339.

[14] Shao Jing, Krishnan H, McCormick S T. Distributing a product line in a decentralized supply chain [J]. Production and Operations Management, 2013, 22(1):151-163.

[15] Shao Jing, Krishnan H, McCormick S T. Price incentives and coordination in a two-product decentralized supply chain [J]. Decision Sciences, 2014, 45(3) :507-533.

两层级分散决策供应链库存转运问题研究

Impact of Transshipment on a Decentralized Supply Chain

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	曹晓宁, 王永明, 薛方红, 刘晓冰. 供应商保鲜努力的生鲜农产品双渠道供应链协调决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(3): 109-118.
[2]	叶同, 关志民, 张大儒, 曲优. Nash讨价还价公平关切下基于低碳商誉的供应链联合减排与广告的动态优化与协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(3): 119-132.
[3]	刘墨林, 但斌, 马崧萱. 考虑保鲜努力与增值服务的生鲜电商供应链最优决策与协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(8): 76-88.
[4]	刘阳, 田军, 冯耕中, 扈衷权. 基于期权契约的政企联合储备应急物资模型与利润分配机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(8): 162-171.
[5]	张旭梅, 王大飞, 任廷海, 官子力, 但斌. 考虑消费者策略行为的供应链两周期定价与契约设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(7): 132-145.
[6]	张玉华, 戴更新, 孙浩, 韩广华, 王磊. 基于信任的供应预测信息共享策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(5): 112-121.
[7]	张云丰, 王勇, 龚本刚, 但斌. 需求受销售价格与变质时间影响的时滞变质品供应链协调研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(3): 142-151.
[8]	扈衷权, 田军, 冯耕中. 基于看跌期权契约的应急物资采购储备模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(2): 69-79.
[9]	代建生. 零售商的资金约束对协调契约的影响分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(10): 98-108.
[10]	王芹鹏. 考虑参考减排努力水平效应的联合减排与竞争动态策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(10): 172-182.
[11]	林晶, 王健, 郑敏. 买方抗衡势力下双渠道促销合作微分博弈研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(9): 80-92.
[12]	王绪金, 马骋. 多层供应链外包模式的选择及其协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(8): 151-161.
[13]	王永龙, 付恒, 方新, 蹇明. 突发性产出下的供应链协调应对策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(7): 137-146.
[14]	杜文意, 刘晓婧, 唐小我. 基于融资需求的损失厌恶零售商订货策略及供应链协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(3): 96-104.
[15]	何彦东, 王旭, 周福礼, 周林. 基于双边努力因素的网购供应链协调研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(2): 83-92.