基金排名与主动性水平:理论与实证

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.08.018

中国管理科学 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (8): 158-167.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.08.018

基金排名与主动性水平:理论与实证

罗荣华¹, 兰伟², 杨云红³

1. 西南财经大学金融学院, 四川成都 611130;
2. 西南财经大学统计学院, 四川成都 6177730;
3. 北京大学光华管理学院, 北京 100871

收稿日期:2013-03-14 修回日期:2013-07-08 出版日期:2015-08-20 发布日期:2015-08-19
作者简介:罗荣华(1980-),男(汉族),湖北宜昌人,西南财经大学副教授,经济学博士,研究方向:金融计量分析.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(11001225,70873003,71021001,11401482)

Interim Performance and Active Management of Mutual Fund: Theory and Evidence

LUO Rong-hua¹, LAN Wei², YANG Yun-hong³

1. School of Finance, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China;
2. School of Statistics, Southuestem University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China;
3. Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Received:2013-03-14 Revised:2013-07-08 Online:2015-08-20 Published:2015-08-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基金排名广泛发表在各种媒体上,对资金流有重要影响,而主动性管理是共同基金最重要的特征。本文首次从理论和实证两方面对基金中期排名与后期主动性水平之间的关系进行了研究。在理论上,基于基金主动性管理的内在特征,本文建立了一个两期的锦标赛博弈模型。模型的纳什混合均衡策略显示,相对于中期排名靠后的输家基金,中期排名靠前的赢家基金会以更大的概率在后期提升其主动性水平。在实证上,基于2006年至2011年间开放式基金的历史数据,本文采用列联表检验与非平衡面板回归分析相结合的方法,从数据上证实了本文的理论分析结果。

关键词: 开放式基金, 相对排名, 主动性管理, 非平衡面板

Abstract: Fund ranking is widely published in various media and have essential impact on funds' future cash flow. The degree of active management is the most fundamental feature of the active mutual fund. Hence, it is very important to study how managers adapt their investment behavior according to the economic incentives from the aspect of active management. In this article, firstly the relationship between funds' mid-year ranking and the later degree of active management theoretically and empirically are illustrated. Theoretically, a two-period tournament model is developted, and it is indicated that the wining managers are more likely to adopt higher degree of active management relative to the losers. Empirically, using the historical data of open-ended fund from 2006 to 2011 in China, it is found that the mid-year "winners" fund that earn returns above the median, did increase their degree of active relative to the losers. Our empirical finding confirmed the results of our theoretical model.

Key words: open-ended fund, relative performance, active management, unbalanced panel data

中图分类号:

F832.5

罗荣华, 兰伟, 杨云红. 基金排名与主动性水平:理论与实证[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(8): 158-167.

LUO Rong-hua, LAN Wei, YANG Yun-hong. Interim Performance and Active Management of Mutual Fund: Theory and Evidence[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(8): 158-167.

参考文献

[1] 龚红,李艳萍,吴绍棠.业绩排序对基金经理投资组合风险选择的影响:基于封闭式基金1998~2008年表现的经验分析[J].世界经济,2010,(4):146-160.

[2] 王明好,陈忠,蔡晓钰.相对业绩对投资基金风险承担行为的影响研究[J].中国管理科学,2004,12(5):1-5.

[3] 江萍,田澎,Cheung Y L. 基金管理公司股权结构域基金绩效研究.金融研究,2011,(6):123-135.

[4] 林树,李翔,杨雄胜,et al. 他们真的是明星吗?—来自中国证券基金市场的经验证据,金融研究,2009,(5):107-120.

[5] 韩燕,李平,崔鑫.哪些基金有超群的分析能力.管理世界,2011,(2):27-39.

[6] 陆蓉,陈百助,徐龙炳,等.基金业绩与投资者的选择—中国开放式基金赎回异常现象的研究.经济研究,2007,(6):39-50.

[7] 陆蓉,李良松.家族共同持股对基金管理公司业绩与风险的影响研究.金融研究,2008,(2):140-151.

[8] 罗荣华,兰伟,杨云红.基金的主动性管理提升了业绩吗?[J].金融研究,2011,(10):127-139.

[9] 佘跃飞,邓超.我国开放式基金规模与回报相关关系实证研究[J].系统工程,2010,28(4):74-78.

[10] 李志文,余佩琨,杨靖.机构投资者与个人投资者羊群行为的差异[J].金融研究,2010,(11):77-89.

[11] Amihud Y, Goyenko R. Mutual fund's R2 as predictor of performance[J].Review of Financial Studies,2013,26(3):667-694.

[12] Basak S, Makarov D. Difference in interim performance and risk taking with short-sale constraints[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2012,103(2):377-392.

[13] Brands S, Brown S J, Gallagher D R. Portfolio concentration and investment manager performance[J]. International Review of Finance, 2006:149-174.

[14] Brown K, Harlow W, Starks L. Of tournaments and temptations: An analysis of managerial incentives in the mutual fund industry[J]. Journal of Finance, 1996,51(1):85-110.

[15] Busse J. Another look at mutual fund tournaments[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2001,36(1):53-73.

[16] Chan K C, Jiang X, Xu Nianhang,et al. Do star analysts know more firm-specific Information? Evidence from China[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance,2013,37(1):89-102.

[17] Chevalier J, Ellison G. Risk taking by mutual funds as a response to incentives[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1997, 105(6): 1167-1200.

[18] Cremers K J, Petajisto A. How active is your fund manager? A new measure that predicts performance[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2009,22(9):3329-3365.

[19] Fama E F, French K R. Luck versus skill in the cross-section of mutual fund returns[J]. Journal of Finance, 2010,65(5), 1915-1947.

[20] Goriaev A, Nijman T, Werker B. Yet another look at mutual fund tournaments[J]. Journal of Empirical Finance, 2005,12(1), 127-137.

[21] Goriaev A, Palomino F, Prat A. Mutual fund tournament: Risk taking incentives induced by ranking objectives. Working Paper,Centre for Economic Policy Research,2003.

[22] Koski J, Pontiff J. How are derivatives used? Evidence from mutual fund industry[J]. Journal of Finance, 1999,54(2):791-816.

[23] Massa M. How do family strategies affect fund performance: When performance-maximization is not the only game in town[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2003,67(4):249-304.

[24] Qiu Jiaping. Termination risk, multiple managers and mutual fund tournaments[J].European Finance Review, 2003,7(2):161-190.

[25] Taylor J.Rish-taking behavior in mutual fund tournaments[J].Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,2003,50(3):373-383.

基金排名与主动性水平:理论与实证

Interim Performance and Active Management of Mutual Fund: Theory and Evidence

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	杨继平, 石晨晓, Daniel CHIEW, Judy QIU, Sirimon TREEPONGKARUNA. 基于期望效用-熵模型的基金评级方法及其在中国基金评级中的应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(12): 1-10.
[2]	凌爱凡, 莫阳紫嫣. 开放式基金“泵浦”现象检验:基于规模、投资风格和管理团队视角的经验证据[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(9): 29-40.
[3]	李昊. 基于概率权重函数和随机占优准则的开放式基金评级[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013, (1): 23-30.
[4]	肖媛, 胡小平, 党风顺. 我国开放式基金的风险度量模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2009, 17(6): 25-32.
[5]	谢赤, 张太原, 禹湘. 开放式基金经理惯性投资行为研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2008, 16(1): 32-41.
[6]	黄学庭. 开放式基金资产配置问题研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2003, (2): 21-23.