合约回收制对闭环供应链影响分析

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.07.020

中国管理科学 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (7): 159-165.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.07.020

合约回收制对闭环供应链影响分析

曹裕, 孟羽, 周文辉

中南大学商学院, 湖南长沙 410083

收稿日期:2013-09-05 修回日期:2014-09-06 出版日期:2015-07-20 发布日期:2015-07-22
作者简介:曹裕(1985-),女(汉族),湖南桃江人,中南大学商学院副教授,博士生导师,研究方向:企业可持续运作管理、企业生命周期.
基金资助:
湖南省自然科学基金重点资助项目(12JJ2042);国家自然科学基金资助项目(71272067);国家社会科学基金资助(14BJY085);湖南哲学社会科学基金基地资助项目(13JD55)

Closed-loop Supply Chain with Contract-recycling System

CAO Yu, MENG Yu, ZHOU Wen-hui

School of Business, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

Received:2013-09-05 Revised:2014-09-06 Online:2015-07-20 Published:2015-07-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了提高再制造闭环供应链的运作效率,文章设计了新的回收方式——合约回收制,并研究了这种回收方式对消费者、企业和整体供应链的影响。在新产品和再造品同时存在的混合市场前提下,文章主要讨论了制造商(M模式)、经销商(R模式)和第三方回收商(3P模式)各自为回收再造主体时,合约回收制对产品定价、回收率、行业规模等因素的影响。研究结果表明:(1)消费者受益于合约回收制;(2)合约回收制壮大了闭环供应链的规模;(3)回收率与再造品评价成正比,与新产品评价成反比,其中R模式和3P模式中回收率因合约回收制而提高;(4)制造商均受益于合约回收制,但经销商和第三方需满足部分条件才可获益。

关键词: 合约回收制, 再制造, 闭环供应链, 仿真模拟

Abstract: In order to raise the recovery rate and improve operational efficiency in remanufacturing closed-loop supply chain, this paper theoretically constructs contract-recycling system. Through this system, the recovery condition will be improved while urging enterprises obtaining more benefits and we hope to enhance consumer recycling awareness and behavior, and thus solve the existing problem of recovery information asymmetry. In considering the basic premise that both new and remanufactured products are sold in the market and different products recognition does exist, the impact is mainly discussed that the contract-recycling system will bring to the scale of industry,recovery rate and pricing with manufacturers(M mode), retailers(R mode) and the third-party recyclers(3P mode) as the main body respectively. A mathematical model is built to, solve the optimal solution of the model through Kuhn Tucker's theorem, then use the mathematical derivation and mathematical simulation are carried on, and finally proposals or comments for government, consumers and firms optimal decisions are proposed. Researches show that: consumers benefit from the contract-recycling system;contract-recycling system strengthens the scale of the closed-loop supply chain;the recovery rate of used products is in proportion to the evaluation of remanufactured products and inversely proportional to that of new products, and the recovery rate will definitely raise in model R and model 3P due to the contract-recycling system; manufacturers always profit from contract-recycling system, but retailers and the third-party recyclers do conditionally. A certain reference for the contract relationship between enterprises and consumers is provided, and a certain contribution for the protection of consumer rights and the improvement of the operation efficiency of remanufacturing industry are made.

Key words: contract-recycling system, remanufacture, closed-loop supply chain, analog simulation

中图分类号:

C931

曹裕, 孟羽, 周文辉. 合约回收制对闭环供应链影响分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(7): 159-165.

CAO Yu, MENG Yu, ZHOU Wen-hui. Closed-loop Supply Chain with Contract-recycling System[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(7): 159-165.

参考文献

[1] Guide V D R, Van L N Wassenhove L N. Managing product returns for remanufacting[J]. Production & Operations Management, 2001,10(2):142-155.

[2] Fleischmann M, Krikke H R, Dekker R, et al. A characterization of logis- tics networks for product recovery[J]. Omega, 2000, 28(6):653-666.

[3] Ostlin J, Sundin E, Björkman M. Importance of closed-loop supply chain relationships for product remanufactur-ing[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2008,115(2): 336-348.

[4] Michael E K, Scuza G C,Guide V D R. Mixed assembly and disassembly operations for remanufacturing[J]. Production and Operation Management, 2003, 12(3): 320-325.

[5] Savaskan R C, Bhattacharya S, Van Wassenhove L N. Close-loop supply chain models with products remanufact-uring[J]. Management Science, 2004, 50(2):239-252.

[6] Karakayali L, Emir Farinas H, Akcali E. An analysis of decentralized collection and processing of end-of-life products[J].Journal of Operations Ma- nagement, 2007, 25(6):116-1183.

[7] 黄祖庆, 达庆利. 直线型再制造供应链决策结构的效率分析[J]. 管理科学报, 2006, 9(4):51-57.

[8] 王文宾, 达庆利. 经销商与第三方回收下闭环供应链回收与定价研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2010, 24(2):130-134.

[9] 洪宪培, 王宗军, 赵丹. 闭环供应链定价模型与回收渠道选择决策[J]. 管理学报, 2012, 9(12): 1847-1855.

[10] Groenevelt H. Competition in remanufac-Turing[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2001, 10(2):125-141.

[11] Debo L G, Toktay L B, Wassenhove L V. Joint life-cycle dynamics of new and remanufactured products[J]. Production & Operations Management, 2006,15(4):498-513.

[12] Wu Chenghan . Price and service com- petition between new and remanufactured products in a two-echelon supply chain[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2012, 140(1):496-507.

[13] 易余胤. 基于再制造的闭环供应链博弈模型[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2009, 29(8): 28-35.

[14] 计国君, 黄位旺. 回收条例约束下的再制造供应链决策[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2010, 30(8):1355-1362.

[15] 颜荣芳, 程永宏, 王彩霞. 再制造闭环供应链最优差价定价模型[J].中国管理科学, 2013, 21(1): 90-97.

[16] 马龙龙. 企业社会责任对消费者购买意愿的影响机制研究[J]. 管理世界, 2011,(5):120-126.

[17] Porteus E. Optimal lot sizing, process quality improvement and setup cost reduction[J]. Operations Research, 1986, 34(1): 137-144.

[18] Debo L,Totkay B,Van Wassenhove L N. Market segmentation and product technology selection for remanufacturable products[J]. Management Science, 2005, 51(8): 1193-1205.

[19] Ferguson M, Toktay L. The effect of competition on recovery strategies[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2006, 15(3): 351-368.

[20] Ferrer G, Swaminathan J M. Managing new and remanufactured products[J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(1): 15-26.

合约回收制对闭环供应链影响分析

Closed-loop Supply Chain with Contract-recycling System

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	赵晓敏, 孟潇潇. 授权模式下制造商与再制造商的演化博弈决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(2): 129-136.
[2]	李巍, 张汉江, 杨柳. 基于市场划分的再制造许可费对定价策略的影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(6): 94-103.
[3]	张盼, 余莉婷, 熊中楷. 政府奖惩下闭环供应链中信息不对称时的最优合同设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(5): 89-100.
[4]	孙浩, 王磊, 李晨, 胡劲松, 钟永光, 达庆利. 回收模式相异的零售商主导型闭环供应链竞争模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(4): 86-98.
[5]	李新然, 李刚. 考虑企业社会责任承担的两阶段闭环供应链协调机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(12): 77-86.
[6]	王玉燕, 苏梅, 申亮, 梁佳平. 电商闭环供应链中的“让利”公平关切回收决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(12): 87-97.
[7]	赵琳, 牟宗玉. 需求扰动下生产规模不经济闭环供应链的应急渠道决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(7): 68-82.
[8]	李芳, 马鑫, 洪佳, 叶春明. 政府规制下非对称信息对闭环供应链差别定价的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(7): 116-126.
[9]	王文宾, 丁军飞, 王智慧, 达庆利. 回收责任分担视角下零售商主导闭环供应链的政府奖惩机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(7): 127-136.
[10]	马德青, 胡劲松. 具公平行为的零售商回收闭环供应链动态均衡策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(4): 70-78.
[11]	石纯来, 聂佳佳. 规模不经济下奖惩机制对闭环供应链制造商合作策略影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(3): 85-95.
[12]	张盼. 政府奖惩下闭环供应链中需求预测信息分享研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(2): 107-118.
[13]	张桂涛, 曲箫宇, 戴更新, 胡劲松, 王永波, 孙浩. 考虑再制造设计水平的多期闭环供应链网络均衡[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(8): 54-66.
[14]	李琰, 林欣怡, 达庆利. 基于再制造的多周期闭环营销投入及定价策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(8): 67-74.
[15]	谢家平, 梁玲, 杨光, 孔凡玉, 陈玉萍. 互补型闭环供应链的收益共享与成本共担契约协调优化[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(8): 94-105.