碳配额下碳交易对碳减排效应的影响及协调机制研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2023.0576

Abstract

Abstract:

In the face of escalating global concerns about climate change， industries ubiquitously confront the daunting task of mitigating their carbon footprints. The manufacturing sector， a pivotal arena for the attainment of the “dual carbon” objectives， is experiencing an exigent demand for holistic emission curtailment throughout its supply chain. This investigation elucidates the ramifications of carbon quota trading in refining carbon mitigation methodologies and their synergistic frameworks. Leveraging insights from carbon quota trading， models are formulated under a decentralized decision-making paradigm， wherein component vendors and manufacturers undertake emission reductions either in isolation or collaboratively. A centralized emission reduction decision-making model is also proposed. The carbon reduction magnitudes， product price structures， sales trajectories， and supply chain advantages are juxtaposed across these divergent emission curtailment models. Predicated on the intensity of emission abatement and value generation， the quintessential model for emission reduction within the ambit of carbon quota trading is indentified.Drawing on the example of a tire manufacturing supply chain， Company A （an upstream component purveyor） delivers essential rubber additives and adjuncts requisite for Company B's （a downstream tire producer） manufacturing processes. Collectively， this firm' strategic initiatives within the supply chain facilitate pronounced carbon reduction in products. The findings underscore that galvanizing supply chain stakeholders to coalesce via profit-sharing and cost-allocation agreements not only averts losses stemming from game-theoretic dynamics but also accentuates the scale of emission abatement and amplifies supply chain yields. Such insights proffer invaluable strategic direction for government entities striving to expedite emission reduction trajectories in the manufacturing domain， concurrently furnishing a theoretical scaffold for supply chain businesses aspiring for win-win synergies.The primary findings of the research are as follows　（1） Within the carbon quota trading framework， a centralized decision-making approach engenders a more pronounced product emission diminution than its decentralized counterpart. Notably， the concurrent emission abatement strategy within the decentralized model manifests the most substantial product emission curtailment. （2） Emission abatement endeavors spearheaded by both upstream and downstream entities in the supply chain augment product turnover and enhance the cumulative supply chain yield. Products' turnover and supply chain yields under a centralized framework conspicuously eclipse those under decentralized decision-making. （3） Pertaining to carbon quota trading， supply chain entities can actualize an optimal coordination blueprint intrinsic to the centralized model by mutually committing to emission reductions and initiating profit-sharing and cost-allocation compacts.

Key words: carbon quota trading, carbon emission reduction technology, coordination mechanism, supply chain

CLC Number:

F272

Biao Li,Xiqiang Xia,Qiuyue Li. Research on the Influence of Carbon Trading on Carbon Emission Reduction Effect and Coordination Mechanism under Carbon Quotas[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(8): 250-260.

Figures/Tables 8

符号	含义
决策变量
$p i$	表示碳减排投资模式为 $i$ 时，最终产品单位零售价格, $i ∈ {H O, H M, H U, H C, H N, H Z}$
$q i$	代表碳减排投资模式为 $i$ 时产品销售量, $i ∈ {H O, H M, H U, H C, H N, H Z}$
$w i$	表示碳减排投资模式为 $i$ 时，单位零部件产品价格， $i ∈ {H O, H M, H U, H N}$
$λ i m, λ i o$	表示碳减排模式为 $i$ 时，生产商与零部件商的碳减排水平, $i ∈ {H O, H M, H U, H C}$
相关参数
$m, o$	分别表示生产商及零部件商
$H O, H M, H U, H C$	分别表示零部件商进行碳减排投资、生产商进行碳减排投资、二者同时进行减排投资、集中决策碳减排投资情形
$H N, H Z$	分别表示供应链上下游均不进行减排投资时的分散决策与集中决策模式
$c m$	表示生产商生产单位产品所花费成本
$c o$	表示零部件商生产单位零部件所花费成本
$h$	表示碳减排投资带给单位产品的减排系数
$E$	代表碳配额交易下规定的总量碳配额
$p e$	碳交易市场购买/出售单位碳排放权所支付/收取的价格，也即碳交易价格
$e n$	表示单位最终产品对环境产生的影响
$π i m, π i o$	分别表示碳减排投资模式为 $i$ 时，生产商及零部件商利润， $i ∈ {H O, H M, H U, H C, H N, H Z}$

References 32

1	Kuo Y M， Goel A， Tsai W S， et al. Reclamation of cutting oil waste to refuse derived fuel： A life cycle assessment approach for a waste-to-energy system［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production， 2022， 333： 130144.
2	Ramzan M， Raza S A， Usman M， et al. Environmental cost of non-renewable energy and economic progress： do ICT and financial development mitigate some burden？［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production， 2022， 333： 130066.
3	Wang B， Liu Q， Wang L， et al. A review of the port carbon emission sources and related emission reduction technical measures［J］. Environmental Pollution， 2023，320： 121000.
4	Wei J， Wang C. Improving interaction mechanism of carbon reduction technology innovation between supply chain enterprises and government by means of differential game［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production， 2021， 296： 126578.
5	Zhu J， Dou Z， Yan X， et al. Exploring the influencing factors of carbon neutralization in Chinese manufacturing enterprises［J］. Environmental Science and Pollution Research， 2023，30（2）： 2918-2944.
6	Lin B， Huang C. Analysis of emission reduction effects of carbon trading： Market mechanism or government intervention？［J］. Sustainable Production and Consumption， 2022， 33： 28-37.
7	Dong Z， Xia C， Fang K， et al. Effect of the carbon emissions trading policy on the co-benefits of carbon emissions reduction and air pollution control［J］. Energy Policy， 2022， 165： 112998.
8	Zakeri A， Dehghanian F， Fahimnia B， et al. Carbon pricing versus emissions trading： A supply chain planning perspective［J］. International Journal of Production Economics， 2015， 164： 197-205.
9	Xu L， Wang C， Zhao J. Decision and coordination in the dual-channel supply chain considering cap-and-trade regulation［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production， 2018， 197： 551-561.
10	Liu H， Kou X， Xu G， et al. Which emission reduction mode is the best under the carbon cap-and-trade mechanism？［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production， 2021， 314： 128053.
11	Hasan M R， Roy T C， Daryanto Y， et al. Optimizing inventory level and technology investment under a carbon tax， cap-and-trade and strict carbon limit regulations［J］. Sustainable Production and Consumption， 2021， 25： 604-621.
12	刘名武，万谧宇，付红.碳交易和低碳偏好下供应链低碳技术选择研究［J］.中国管理科学，2018，26（1）：152-162.
	Liu M W， Wan M Y， Fu H. Research on low carbon technology selection in supply chain under carbon trading and low carbon preference［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science，2018，26（1）：152-162.
13	夏西强，朱庆华，刘军军.上下游绿色研发模式对比分析及协调机制研究［J］.系统工程理论与实践，2021，41（12）：3336-3348.
	Xia X Q， Zhu Q H， Liu J J. Comparative analysis of upstream and downstream green R&D models and research on coordination mechanism［J］. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice，2021，41（12）：3336-3348.
14	姚凡军，肖汉，高野，等.碳配额交易政策下考虑消费者偏好和成员行为的供应链微分博弈研究［J］.中国管理科学，2024，32（1）：231-241.
	Yao F J， Xiao H， Gao Y， et al. A study of supply chain differential game considering consumer preferences and members' behavior under carbon quota trading policy［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2024，32（1）：231-241.
15	夏良杰，柳慧，张萌，等.强制减排规制下基于碳减排利润增量分享契约的供应链协调研究［J］.运筹与管理，2019，28（5）：92-98+107.
	Xia L J， Liu H， Zhang M， et al. A study on supply chain coordination based on carbon emission reduction profit increment sharing contract under mandatory emission reduction regulation［J］. Operations Research and Management， 2019，28（5）：92-98+107.
16	张令荣，刘笑言，王锋，等.碳配额交易政策下闭环供应链谎报决策与协调研究［J/OL］.管理工程学报，2023，DOI：10.13587/j.cnki.jieem.2023.04.017 . doi: 10.13587/j.cnki.jieem.2023.04.017
	Zhang L R， Liu X Y， Wang F， et al. Research on decision making and coordination of closed-loop supply chain misreporting under carbon quota trading policy［J/OL］. Journal of Management Engineering，2023，DOI：10.13587/j.cnki.jieem.2023.04.017 . doi: 10.13587/j.cnki.jieem.2023.04.017
17	夏西强，路梦圆，郭磊.碳交易下碳配额分配方式对制造/再制造影响研究［J］.系统工程理论与实践，2022，42（11）：3001-3015.
	Xia X Q， Lu M Y， Guo L. Study on the impact of carbon quota allocation method on manufacturing/remanufacturing under carbon trading［J］. Systems Engineering- Theory & Practice，2022，42（11）：3001-3015.
18	张桂涛，王广钦，赵欣语，等.碳配额交易体系下闭环供应链网络的生产与碳交易策略研究［J］.中国管理科学，2021，29（1）：97-108.
	Zhang G T， Wang G Q， Zhao X Y， et al. Research on production and carbon trading strategy of closed-loop supply chain network under carbon quota trading system［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science，2021，29（1）：97-108.
19	Zhao S， Shi Y， Xu J. Carbon emissions quota allocation based equilibrium strategy toward carbon reduction and economic benefits in China's building materials industry［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production， 2018， 189： 307-325.
20	Shi B， Li N， Gao Q， et al. Market incentives， carbon quota allocation and carbon emission reduction： Evidence from China's carbon trading pilot policy［J］. Journal of Environmental Management， 2022，319： 115650.
21	孙嘉轶，杨露，姚锋敏.考虑低碳偏好及碳减排的闭环供应链回收及专利授权策略［J］.运筹与管理，2022，31（9）：120-127.
	Sun J Y， Yang L， Yao F M. A closed-loop supply chain recycling and patent licensing strategy considering low carbon preference and carbon reduction［J］. Operations Research and Management，2022，31（9）：120-127.
22	Sun L， Cao X， Alharthi M， et al. Carbon emission transfer strategies in supply chain with lag time of emission reduction technologies and low-carbon preference of consumers［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production， 2020， 264： 121664.
23	王珊珊，张李浩，范体军.基于碳减排技术的竞争供应链投资均衡策略研究［J］.中国管理科学，2020，28（6）：73-82.
	Wang S S， Zhang L H， Fan T J. Research on investment equilibrium strategy of competitive supply chain based on carbon reduction technology［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science，2020，28（6）：73-82.
24	Liu J， Ke H， Tian G. Impact of emission reduction investments on decisions and profits in a supply chain with two competitive manufacturers［J］. Computers & Industrial Engineering， 2020， 149： 106784.
25	Lou G X， Xia H Y， Zhang J Q， et al. Investment strategy of emission-reduction technology in a supply chain［J］. Sustainability， 2015， 7（8）： 10684-10708.
26	王冬冬，刘勇.考虑利他偏好和碳减排努力绩效的供应链决策［J］.工业工程与管理，2020，25（6）：116-125.
	Wang D D， Liu Y. Supply chain decision making considering altruistic preferences and performance of carbon reduction efforts［J］. Industrial Engineering and Management，2020，25（6）：116-125.
27	Liu Z， Huang Y Q， Shang W L， et al. Precooling energy and carbon emission reduction technology investment model in a fresh food cold chain based on a differential game［J］. Applied Energy， 2022， 326： 119945.
28	张李浩，董款，张荣.基于碳配额交易和减排技术的供应链策略选择［J］.中国管理科学，2019，27（1）：63-72.
	Zhang L H， Dong K， Zhang R. Supply chain strategy selection based on carbon allowance trading and emission reduction technology［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science，2019，27（1）：63-72.
29	Zhang W， Li G， Guo F. Does carbon emissions trading promote green technology innovation in China？［J］. Applied Energy， 2022， 315： 119012.
30	Chen W， Chen J， Ma Y. Renewable energy investment and carbon emissions under cap-and-trade mechanisms［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production， 2021， 278： 123341.
31	余佳，游达明.考虑风险厌恶特征的供应链竞合模式比较研究［J］.系统工程理论与实践，2019，39（8）：2091-2104.
	Yu J， You D M. A comparative study of supply chain competing models considering risk aversion characteristics ［J］. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice，2019，39（8）：2091-2104.
32	Karray S， Martín-Herrán G， Sigué S P. Cooperative advertising for competing manufacturers： The impact of long-term promotional effects［J］. International Journal of Production Economics， 2017， 184： 21-32.

[1]	Liangjie Xia, Mengxian Gu, Youdong Li, Jun Wang. Pricing Strategies of Supply Chain with Asymmetric Demand Information Considering Equity Holding under Different Power Structures [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(6): 250-260.
[2]	Chengfu Wang, Xiangfeng Chen, Wei Jin, Wen Ding. Purchase Order Financing and Supply Chain Operations Strategies under Blockchain Smart Contract-driven Dynamitic Interest Rate Pricing [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(6): 319-330.
[3]	Shunyong Li, Maozeng Xu, Ligang Cui. Research on Sustainable Resilient Supply Chain Networks: A Review and Outlook [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(5): 272-284.
[4]	Qiuxiang Li, Shuge Zhang, Baofeng Huo, Zhaofang Mao, Yimin Huang. Research Dynamics of Supply Chain Signaling Theory: Perspectives, Veins, Controversies and Blind Spots [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(5): 295-309.
[5]	Yande Gong, Ji Kai, Zhe Wang. Research on Closed Loop Supply Chain Strategy Considering Fair Preference and Green Innovation [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(5): 310-321.
[6]	Hui Yu, Xiaoyi Li, Caihong Sun. Research on Decision Coordination Mechanism of Two-way Supply Chain between Mutual Customers and Suppliers [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(5): 322-331.
[7]	Xiaogang Cao, Bowei Cao, Hui Wen. Closed-loop Supply Chain Decision of Hybrid Recycling Channels Considering Fairness Concerns [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(4): 243-255.
[8]	Xiaohong Chen, Ningyi Yang, Yanju Zhou. Co-construction Strategy of New Energy Vehicle Industry [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(4): 256-265.
[9]	Xiaoye Yang, Xueqin Hu, Hua Song. Evolution Process and Optimal Decision of Dynamic Discounting Program in Supply Chain Finance [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(3): 159-169.
[10]	Qingming Zou, Wenfang Xie, Yuqiong Li. Financing and Pricing Decisions for a Green Supply Chain with Manufacturer's Overconfidence [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(3): 170-180.
[11]	Yuyan Wang, Junhong Gao, Yulin Sun, Ying Cui. Research on Service and Pricing in a Dual-channel Supply Chain Based on Demand Shift and Quality Perception Induced by Free-riding Behavior [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(3): 253-262.
[12]	Ying Feng, Shuting Wang, Yanzhi Zhang. The Impact of the Business Model on a Fresh Agri-product Supply Chain with Logistics Outsourcing [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(3): 263-274.
[13]	Tao Li, Jun Zhao, Yang Liu, Bin Liu. Pricing Strategy in a Competitive Supply Chain under Retailers’“Virtual Bargaining” [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(3): 275-285.
[14]	Daoming Dai, Yidu Wang. Photovoltaic Supply Chain Cooperation and Operational Decision under Renewable Portfolio Standard [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(3): 320-332.
[15]	Lu Liu, Lei Hu, Tao Jiang, Liwen Jiang. Selection, Conflict, and Mechanism Design of Platform Financing with Resilience Considerations [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(3): 57-68.

Research on the Influence of Carbon Trading on Carbon Emission Reduction Effect and Coordination Mechanism under Carbon Quotas

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 32

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0