技术创新、效率改进与企业高质量增长的技术路径

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2023.1979

Abstract

Abstract:

High-quality development is an important theme for China's economic development at present and in the coming period. It is also an important guarantee for the realization of Chinese-style modernization. As an important microeconomic entity in China， enterprises play an important role in driving China's economic development. High-quality growth of enterprises is crucial to realizing high-quality development of the Chinese economy. Therefore， it is of great practical significance to explore the theoretical and practical issues of realizing high-quality growth of enterprises.Data Envelopment Analysis （DEA） is an important technical tool to analyze the quality and efficiency of enterprises. DEA projection analysis is the most prominent highlight and advantage of this method. The traditional DEA model takes the production frontier constructed by effective decision-making units as a reference， and the effective level that decision-making units may reach can be predicted through DEA projection， which gives the direction and degree of adjustment of each evaluation index， and has a very prominent advantage. However， the DEA projection method also has some aspects that need to be improved.First of all， DEA projection can only provide effective improvement strategies for ineffective decision-making units， but cannot provide references for the stage-by-stage improvement goals of ineffective units. For example， the annual growth targets of listed companies in China are not always DEA effective， and DEA projection cannot provide improvement strategies for such targets. Second， in many cases， decision units are not always improved to DEA effective. For example， not every ordinary person can become a world champion through training. In fact， the probability of an average person becoming a world champion is negligible. If some almost unattainable goals are used as a guide for the decision unit's behavior， this will not only seriously mislead the decision unit's strategy formulation， but also may cause significant damage to the decision unit. Finally， the improvement information given by the DEA prediction also suffers from oversimplification of the improvement information and poor operability of the improvement program. In order to further solve the shortcomings of the DEA projection method and provide enterprises with improvement strategies based on a variety of expected goals， a DEA model is proposed based on different efficiency improvement goals. Then， the DEA projection formula based on different efficiency improvement goals is given. Secondly， a quantitative method for measuring the difficulty of efficiency improvement and technological innovation of decision-making units is proposed， and furthermore， the improvement strategies of decision-making units under multiple efficiency objectives are given. Finally， the method is applied to analyze the efficiency status and growth trend of Chinese Internet listed companies from 2018 to 2022. The results show that the method of this paper not only optimizes the traditional DEA projection method， but also enriches the inverse DEA model system， and provides technical support and reference for enterprises to achieve high-quality growth.

Key words: technological innovation, efficiency improvement, technological path of high-quality growth for enterprises, inverse DEA model, panel data

CLC Number:

Zhanxin Ma,Jie Bai,Yuzhen Tian. Technological Innovation, Efficiency Improvement and the Technological Path of High-quality Growth for Enterprises[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(7): 49-60.

Figures/Tables 16

References 26

[1]	马占新. 数据包络分析模型与方法［M］. 北京：科学出版社， 2010.
	Ma Z X. Data envelopment analysis model and method［M］. Beijing： Science Press， 2010.
[2]	马占新. 广义参考集DEA模型及其相关性质［J］. 系统工程与电子技术， 2012， 34（4）： 709-714.
	Ma Z X. DEA model with generalized reference set and its properties［J］. Systems Engineering and Electronics， 2012， 34（4）： 709-714.
[3]	Charnes A， Cooper W W， Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units［J］. European Journal of Operational Research， 1978， 2（6）： 429-444.
[4]	Banker R D， Charnes A， Cooper W W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis［J］. Management Science， 1984， 30（9）： 1078-1092.
[5]	Seth B， Saxena P， Arora S. Efficiency assessment of Indian passenger airlines using two-stage efficiency model： Non traditional DEA approach［J］. International Journal of Modelling and Simulation， 2021， 41（5）： 351-358.
[6]	Li B， Huo Y， Yin S. Sustainable financing efficiency and environmental value in China’s energy conservation and environmental protection industry under the double carbon target［J］. Sustainability， 2022， 14（15）： 9604.
[7]	肖仁桥，陈忠卫，钱丽. 异质性技术视角下中国高技术制造业创新效率研究［J］. 管理科学， 2018， 31（1）： 48-68.
	Xiao R Q， Chen Z W， Qian L. China’s high-tech manufacturing industries' innovation efficiency： Technology heterogeneity perspective［J］. Journal of Management Science， 2018， 31（1）： 48-68.
[8]	徐立平，姜向荣，尹翀. 企业创新能力评价指标体系研究［J］. 科研管理， 2015， 36（S1）： 122-126.
	Xu L P， Jiang X R， Yin C. Aresearch on the evaluation index system about innovation ability of enterprises［J］. Science Research Management， 2015， 36（S1）： 122-126.
[9]	王美强，常梅. 考虑资金运营方式的中国商业银行经营效率分析［J］. 中国管理科学， 2023， 31（7）： 140-152.
	Wang M Q， Chang M. Evaluating the operational performance for commercial banks in China considering the profit way［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2023， 31（7）： 140-152.
[10]	范德成，杜明月. 高端装备制造业技术创新资源配置效率及影响因素研究——基于两阶段StoNED和Tobit模型的实证分析［J］. 中国管理科学， 2018， 26（1）： 13-24.
	Fan D C， Du M Y. Research on technological innovation resource allocation efficiency and its influencing factors in high-end equipment manufacturing industries—Based on the empirical analysis of the two-stage StoNED-Tobit model［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2018， 26（1）： 13-24.
[11]	Fang S， Xue X， Yin G， et al. Evaluation and improvement of technological innovation efficiency of new energy vehicle enterprises in China based on DEA：Tobit model［J］. Sustainability， 2020， 12（18）： 7509.
[12]	Li T， Wen J， Zeng D， et al. Has enterprise digital transformation improved the efficiency of enterprise technological innovation？ A case study on Chinese listed companies［J］. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering， 2022， 19（12）： 12632-12654.
[13]	王鹏辉，王志强，刘伯凡. 政府研发资助与企业创新效率——基于倾向得分匹配法的实证检验［J］. 经济问题， 2021（4）： 87-95.
	Wang P H， Wang Z Q， Liu B F. Government R & D funding and enterprises innovation efficiency： Empirical test based on propensity score matching method［J］. On Economic Problems， 2021（4）： 87-95.
[14]	邢俊文，迟宝山，刘锋. 研发项目技术风险度的三参数量化模型研究［J］. 系统工程理论与实践， 2008， 28（10）： 131-137.
	Xing J W， Chi B S， Liu F. Research on the three-parameter technical risk quantification model for R & D project［J］. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice， 2008， 28（10）： 131-137.
[15]	Chen T Y. A novel risk evaluation method of technological innovation using an inferior ratio-based assignment model in the face of complex uncertainty［J］. Expert Systems with Applications， 2018， 95： 333-350.
[16]	Yan H， Wei Q， Hao G. DEA models for resource reallocation and production input/output estimation［J］. European Journal of Operational Research， 2002， 136（1）： 19-31.
[17]	Wei Q， Zhang J， Zhang X. An inverse DEA model for inputs/outputs estimate［J］. European Journal of Operational Research， 2000， 121（1）： 151-163.
[18]	Chen L， Wang Y M. Limitation and optimization of inputs and outputs in the inverse data envelopment analysis under variable returns to scale［J］. Expert Systems with Applications， 2021， 183： 115344.
[19]	Kalantary M， Saen R F. Assessing sustainability of supply chains： An inverse network dynamic DEA model［J］. Computers & Industrial Engineering， 2019， 135： 1224-1238.
[20]	Zhang X S， Cui J C. A project evaluation system in the state economic information system of China An operations research practice in public sectors［J］. International Transactions in Operational Research， 1999， 6（5）： 441-452.
[21]	Gattoufi S， Amin G R， Emrouznejad A. A new inverse DEA method for merging banks［J］. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics， 2014， 25（1）： 73-87.
[22]	Amin G R， Emrouznejad A， Gattoufi S. Modelling generalized firms’ restructuring using inverse DEA［J］. Journal of Productivity Analysis， 2017， 48（1）： 51-61.
[23]	Amin G R， Emrouznejad A， Gattoufi S. Minor and major consolidations in inverse DEA： Definition and determination［J］. Computers & Industrial Engineering， 2017， 103： 193-200.
[24]	Sayar T， Ghiyasi M， Fathali J. New inverse DEA models for budgeting and planning［J］. RAIRO - Operations Research， 2021， 55（3）： 1933-1948.
[25]	马占新，苏日古嘎. 基于前沿面修正的DEA-Malmquist指数方法研究［J］. 中国管理科学， 2025， 33（3）： 118-127.
	Ma Z X， Su R. Study of DEA-malmquist index method based on frontier surface modification［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2025， 33（3）： 118-127.
[26]	See K F， Ma Z， Tian Y. Examining the efficiency of regional university technology transfer in China： A mixed-integer generalized data envelopment analysis framework［J］. Technological Forecasting and Social Change， 2023， 197： 122802.

决策单元	A	B	C	D	E
投入（x）	2	4	4	8	8
产出（y）	2	6	2	6	6
效率值	1	1	0.5	0.5	0.5

决策单元	年度效率增长值			2023年预期
决策单元	最小值	平均值	最大值	效率目标值
C	0.05	0.10	0.15	0.6
D	0.02	0.05	0.10	0.6
E	-0.20	-0.10	-0.05	0.6

决策单元	效率值（θ）
企业A	1
企业B	0.80
企业C	0.75
企业D	0.32
行业平均	0.72

决策单元	效率值（θ）
企业A	1.2
企业B	1.0
企业C	1.0
企业D	0.72

企业名称	目标效率	投入投影	投入改进幅度（%）	产出投影
企业A	1.20	13.33	16.67	40
企业B	1.00	19.20	20.00	48
企业C	1.00	24.00	25.00	60
企业D	0.72	17.78	55.55	32

Technological Innovation, Efficiency Improvement and the Technological Path of High-quality Growth for Enterprises

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 16

References 26

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

企业	2022年	目标	改进	企业	2022年	目标	改进
编号	效率	效率	幅度（%）	编号	效率	效率	幅度（%）
E1	1.00	-	-	E21	0.69	1.00	44.93
E2	1.00	-	-	E22	0.69	1.00	44.93
E3	1.00	-	-	E23	0.65	1.00	53.85
E4	1.00	-	-	E24	0.65	1.00	53.85
E5	1.00	-	-	E25	0.64	1.00	56.25
E6	1.00	-	-	E26	0.61	1.00	63.93
E7	1.00	-	-	E27	0.60	1.00	66.67
E8	1.00	-	-	E28	0.58	1.00	72.41
E9	1.00	-	-	E29	0.57	1.00	75.44
E10	1.00	-	-	E30	0.56	1.00	78.57
E11	1.00	-	-	E31	0.54	1.00	85.19
E12	0.94	1.00	6.38	E32	0.52	1.00	92.31
E13	0.88	1.00	13.64	E33	0.51	1.00	96.08
E14	0.84	1.00	19.05	E34	0.51	1.00	96.08
E15	0.80	1.00	25.00	E35	0.46	1.00	117.39
E16	0.76	1.00	31.58	E36	0.43	1.00	132.56
E17	0.75	1.00	33.33	E37	0.42	1.00	138.10
E18	0.72	1.00	38.89	E38	0.39	1.00	156.41
E19	0.72	1.00	38.89	E39	0.39	1.00	156.41
E20	0.72	1.00	38.89	E40	0.30	1.00	233.33

企业名称	时间	目标效率	营业收入投影	改进值	改进幅度
E18	2023	0.81	4457.82	542.97	13.87%
	2024	0.91	5000.79	1085.94	27.74%
	2025	1.00	5543.76	1628.91	41.61%
E32	2023	0.59	1438.85	219.14	17.97%
	2024	0.65	1656.50	436.79	35.81%
	2025	0.72	1874.15	654.44	53.66%

企业名称	时间	目标效率	员工总数改进幅度(%)	资产总额改进幅度(%)	经营成本改进幅度(%)
E18	2023	0.81	11.40	11.39	11.39
	2024	0.91	20.43	20.45	20.45
	2025	1.00	27.84	27.83	27.83
E32	2023	0.59	79.96	11.37	11.37
	2024	0.65	82.00	20.41	20.41
	2025	0.72	83.68	27.78	27.78

[1]	Zhibing Lin, Weijun Cai, Chongjie Shen. Green Technology Innovation Decision-making Considering Technical Efficiency Uncertainty under Manufacturer Competition [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(7): 264-276.
[2]	Qiang Hu, Jiqing Xie, Guangsi Zhang, Ling Liang, Jiaping Xie. Contract Design of Government Incentives for Collaborative Innovation in Scientific and Technological Innovation Platforms: A Double Information Asymmetry Perspective [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(1): 153-166.
[3]	Jian Cao, Jinyi Chen, Qin Shao. Technical Input and Cooperation of Energy Enterprises under Renewable Portfolio Standard [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(9): 291-300.
[4]	Chengchao Lv, Yanjie Jiang, Jiahao He. Carbon Emission Reduction Effect of Green Financial Policies: Evidence from the Green Financial Reform and Innovation Pilot Zone [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(3): 360-368.
[5]	WU Bai-yu, ZHONG Wei-jun, MEI Shu-e. Is the Subcontractors’ Altruism really Beneficial to Public Goods Technological Innovation under Dual Dependence? [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(2): 182-194.
[6]	WEN Shu-yang, LIN Ze-fu, LIU Xi-liang. Green Finance and Economic Growth Quality: Construction of General Equilibrium Model with Resource Constraints and Empirical Test [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(3): 55-65.
[7]	OUYANG Xiao-ling, ZHANG Jun-hao, DU Gang. Environmental Regulation and Green Technological Innovation: Impact Mechanism Analysis and Spatial Spillover Effects [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(12): 141-151.
[8]	HU Jun, WU Jun-min, WU Jie, SHENG Yong-xiang, SHI Qin-fen. Research on the Competition and Coordination of Photovoltaic Industry Supply Chain Driven by Innovation ——Based on Government Competition Policy [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(10): 256-264.
[9]	SU Yuan, LI Guang-pei. Green Technological Innovation Ability, Product Differentiation and Enterprise Competitiveness: Analysis of Energy Saving and Environmental Protection Industry Listed Companies [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(4): 46-56.
[10]	ZHAO Gong-min, YU Li-ping, DAI Hua-yong. Innovation Quantity, Innovation Quality and Foreign Trade Export [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(2): 61-68.
[11]	HUANG Li-qing, ZHANG Gong-liang. Research on Strategic Consumer Innovation Perception and Product Pricing and Rollover Strategy [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(2): 89-98.
[12]	WANG Sheng-quan, CHEN Lang-nan, LIU Ren-hao. Asset Bubbles, Technological Innovation and Economic Growth [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(10): 1-12.
[13]	WANG Yu-ze, LUO Neng-sheng. The Effect of Outward Foreign Direct Investment on the Income Inequality in Home Country: A Study Based on Transnational Panel Data [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(4): 1-12.
[14]	SUN Bo, LIU Shan-shi, JIANG Jun-hui, GE Chun-mian, ZHOU Huai-kang. The Financial Constraints and Firm Innovation: From the Perspective of Human Capital Network [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(4): 179-189.
[15]	CHEN Ye-ting, ZHU Rui, SONG Zhi-gang, YAN Dong. Research of the Impact of Financial Reform on Total Factor Productivity-based on the Empirical Data of 5 National Financial Reform Test Areas [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(9): 19-28.