主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (9): 258-271.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2024.0106

• • 上一篇    下一篇

基于消费者等待行为的零售商自我保价策略研究

李行正1, 徐金鹏1(), 昝田芳1, 冯耕中2   

  1. 1.西安电子科技大学经济与管理学院,陕西 西安 710126
    2.西安交通大学管理学院,陕西 西安 710049
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-23 修回日期:2024-06-20 出版日期:2026-09-25 发布日期:2026-09-01
  • 通讯作者: 徐金鹏 E-mail:jpxu@xidian.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社科青年项目(22YJC630173);教育部人文社科青年项目(25YJC630070);西安市软科学一般项目(25RKYJ0046);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(KYFZ26020);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(KYFZ26029)

Posterior Price Matching of a Retailer Based on Consumers' Waiting Behavior

Xingzheng Li1, Jinpeng Xu1(), Tianfang Zan1, Gengzhong Feng2   

  1. 1.School of Economics& Management,Xidian University,Xi'an 710126,China
    2.School of Management,Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi'an 710049,China
  • Received:2024-01-23 Revised:2024-06-20 Online:2026-09-25 Published:2026-09-01
  • Contact: Jinpeng Xu E-mail:jpxu@xidian.edu.cn

摘要:

零售商提供自我保价政策有利于减少消费者购买时的等待行为,这在“双十一”等活动前期显得尤为重要。然而,零售商应如何科学地制定保价和定价决策尚不清楚。本文考虑市场上存在等待型和即期购买型两类消费者,在两周期框架下构建零售商的保价和定价决策模型,研究零售商在未采用和采用保价策略时的最优定价,分析了保价策略对最优定价和利润的影响机理,明确了保价策略的应用条件。结果表明,第二期潜在市场规模对零售商最优定价起着决定性作用,等待型消费者的存在会一定程度上促使未采用保价策略的零售商在第二期降价,消费者申请保价的行为会促使采用保价策略的零售商在第二期维持或提高价格,但仍有可能在第二期降价。零售商提供保价政策可在一定条件下降低整体价格水平并提高利润,使零售商和消费者同时受益。本文还考虑等待型消费者存在异质性和第二期潜在市场规模存在不确定性进行了扩展研究,主要贡献在于从消费者结构和行为的角度揭示了零售商是否采用自我保价策略对两期定价决策的作用机理,明确了零售商可以获益于自我保价策略的条件。本文研究结果不仅可以丰富自我保价策略的理论研究,还可为零售商保价和定价决策提供指导性建议。

关键词: 定价策略, 自我保价策略, 消费者等待行为, 消费者结构

Abstract:

With the evolution of e-commerce platforms, it has become common for consumers to delay purchases, anticipating future discounts. Posterior price matching policies help reduce this waiting behavior, especially before major sales events (e.g., Double 11 shopping festival). Under such a policy, consumers can request compensation from a retailer if they find a lower price for the same product within a specified period after purchase. The optimal strategy for a retailer to make scientific pricing and price matching decisions, considering consumer waiting behavior, remains unclear. The following questions are addressed: How should a retailer set prices without and with the posterior price matching policy? How does this policy influence the retailer's optimal pricing and profitability? What impact do factors such as consumer characteristics and future market size have on the retailer’s decision to adopt the policy?To address these questions, a market consisting of two consumer types is modeled: waiting and immediate purchase. A two-period framework for a retailer's pricing and price matching decisions is developed, analyzing two scenarios: non-adoption (Scenario N) and adoption (Scenario M) of the posterior price matching policy.The findings indicate that the potential market size in the second period significantly impacts the retailer's optimal pricing decision. The presence of waiting consumers prompts retailers without the price matching policy to lower prices in the second period. Conversely, retailers with the policy may maintain or increase prices due to compensation claims, though price reductions cannot be entirely ruled out. Additionally, the policy can lower overall price levels and increase profits under certain conditions, benefiting both retailers and consumers. The mechanisms and conditions under which a retailer adopts the posterior price matching policy from the perspective of consumer structure are examined. In other words, the main contribution of this study is to examine the retailer's optimal pricing strategies with and without the posterior price matching policy, and to analyze the mechanisms by which the policy affects optimal pricing and profitability as well as the conditions under which the retailer can benefit from the policy. It enriches theoretical research on price matching policies and offers practical guidance for retailers in this study. Specifically, retailers should fully investigate the utility loss and proportion of waiting consumers, the rate of compensation claims, and the potential market size of the second period in order to scientifically decide on the posterior price matching policy. At the same time, retailers should endeavor to create the image that they will not reduce prices when they adopt the posterior price matching policy in order to increase their profits. Market administrators are encouraged to promote the policy under suitable conditions, as it benefits both retailers and consumers. In addition, Individual consumers should utilize the policy judiciously and monitor post-purchase prices.

Key words: pricing strategy, posterior price matching policy, consumers' waiting behavior, consumer structure

中图分类号: