主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 276-286.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2023.0351cstr: 32146.14.j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2023.0351

• • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑供应风险的OEM/ODM供应链决策研究

许浩楠1,2, 刘家国1()   

  1. 1.大连海事大学航运经济与管理学院,辽宁 大连 116026
    2.重庆交通大学经济与管理学院,重庆 400074
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-03 修回日期:2023-05-20 出版日期:2026-04-25 发布日期:2026-03-27
  • 通讯作者: 刘家国 E-mail:liujiaguo@gmail.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年项目(72502028);中国博士后科学基金面上项目(2025MD774154)

Research on OEM/ODM Supply Chain Decision Making Considering Supply Risk

Haonan Xu1,2, Jiaguo Liu1()   

  1. 1.School of Maritime Economics and Management,Dalian Maritime University,Dalian 116026,China
    2.School of Management Science and Engineering,Chongqing Jiaotong University,Chongqing 400074,China
  • Received:2023-03-03 Revised:2023-05-20 Online:2026-04-25 Published:2026-03-27
  • Contact: Jiaguo Liu E-mail:liujiaguo@gmail.com

摘要:

在由原始设备制造商(OEM)、原始设计制造商(ODM)与合同制造商(CM)构成的供应链系统中,考虑上游供应风险构建基于竞合关系的多方博弈模型并求得均衡决策,进一步探析了规模经济、品牌优势等对供应链经营策略的影响。研究结果表明:即使CM存在供应风险,也会挤压ODM收益,而OEM通过上游竞争可获得收益提升。CM供应中断后,OEM品牌优势较小时,ODM选择参与终端市场竞争以进一步提升收益,当品牌优势较大时,ODM专注上游供应可以缓解终端竞争,但规模经济对ODM和OEM收益有异质影响,厂商应警惕规模经济可能带来的负面影响。值得关注的是,ODM与OEM决策始终处于“双输”状态,OEM作为“跟随者”,只能借助品牌优势等措施保证自身收益实现;而ODM决策可使其与社会福利可实现“双赢”。本研究不仅深入解构了供应风险对多元采购的冲击,也探索了供应中断对厂商决策的影响,为厂商面对风险经营环境如何决策提供了指导,也为政策管理部门应对供应风险、提升社会福利提供参考。

关键词: 供应风险, 供应中断, 规模经济, 竞合博弈

Abstract:

In the supply chain system comprising an Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM), an Original Design Manufacturer (ODM), and a Contract Manufacturer (CM), a multi-party game model based on competitive-cooperative relationships is developed to address upstream supply risks and determine equilibrium decisions. Furthermore, the impacts of economies of scale and brand advantage on supply chain management strategies are explored. The research findings indicate that even in the presence of supply risks, the CM can squeeze the profits of ODM, while the OEM can achieve profit gains through upstream competition. When the supply from the CM is disrupted, the ODM with weaker OEM brand advantage may choose to participate in end-market competition to further enhance profits. However, when the brand advantage of the OEM is significant, the ODM may focus on upstream supply to mitigate competition in the end market. Nevertheless, economies of scale have heterogeneous impacts on the profits of ODM and OEM, and manufacturers should be cautious of the potential negative effects that economies of scale may bring. It is noteworthy that the decision-making of ODM and OEM remains in a “lose-lose” situation, where the OEM as “follower” can only rely on measures such as brand advantage to ensure own profit realization, while the ODM’ decision can achieve a “win-win” outcome for both itself and social welfare. Not only a comprehensive understanding of the impact of supply risks on diversified procurement is provided but also the influence of supply disruptions on firm decision-making is explored. It offers strategic guidance for firms on decision-making in risk-operating environments and provides theoretical analysis for policy management departments in addressing supply risks and enhancing social welfare.

Key words: supply risks, supply disruption, large-scale economy, co-opetition game

中图分类号: