主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 345-356.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2023.1888cstr: 32146.14.j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2023.1888

• • 上一篇    下一篇

承诺视角下企业对人工智能推荐服务的策略性使用

刘慧慧1, 张浩哲2, 刘霖1()   

  1. 1.北京航空航天大学经济管理学院,北京 100191
    2.中国航空发动机集团财务有限公司,北京 100048
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-13 修回日期:2024-09-02 出版日期:2026-03-25 发布日期:2026-03-06
  • 通讯作者: 刘霖 E-mail:linliubh@buaa.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(72272149);国家自然科学基金项目(72271014);国家自然科学基金项目(72242101);北京航空航天大学经济管理学院航空航天专项启动经费项目

The Strategic Use of AI Recommendation Service from the Perspective of Commitment

Huihui Liu1, Haozhe Zhang2, Lin Liu1()   

  1. 1.School of Economics and Management,Beihang University,Beijing 100191,China
    2.AECC FINANCE CO. ,LTD,Beijing 100048,China
  • Received:2023-11-13 Revised:2024-09-02 Online:2026-03-25 Published:2026-03-06
  • Contact: Lin Liu E-mail:linliubh@buaa.edu.cn

摘要:

目前,基于人工智能(AI)的个性化推荐服务已经被企业广泛应用于市场营销的各个方面。企业利用AI对消费者的购买行为进行分析,通过用户画像了解消费者偏好,在未来的销售季度能够智能推荐更加符合消费者偏好的商品。一方面,AI可以帮助提升推荐商品和消费者偏好之间的匹配度,以刺激消费进而扩大市场,形成对销售的促进效应;另一方面,也可能导致策略性消费者形成未来会被推荐更合适商品的预期,进而助长观望情绪,由此带来延迟购买效应,这使得企业在利用AI进行个性化推荐时,变得更加谨慎。本文从企业采取的承诺策略这一视角出发,研究企业应该如何策略性地使用基于AI的个性化推荐服务。通过构建两期的动态博弈模型,本文考察两种承诺策略:(1)价格承诺策略,即企业提前告知两期商品的销售价格,对应现实中商家的价格保护策略等;(2)匹配承诺策略,即企业通过宣传自己的AI推荐,让消费者对未来被推荐商品的匹配精准度提升有正确的预期。承诺策略影响消费者对产品不同销售期的价值判断,进而调节购买行为,为AI推荐的实施形成策略性交互。研究结果表明,引入基于AI的个性化推荐服务,并不一定总是对企业有利,只有当原本的延迟购买效应较弱,或者AI带来的销量提升效应足够强时,AI推荐才能使企业受益。匹配承诺策略看似会加重消费者的观望情绪,促进延迟购买,实际上,反而会减弱该效应,而且,在这一策略下,企业只需提供较低的匹配提升预期。另外,企业对AI推荐的使用程度和其为匹配精度提升所付出的成本之间不一定是正相关的,即可能成本虽然高,企业反而应该大力推广AI推荐,提升商品匹配精度,这取决于在销量提升和延迟购买两个效应上的权衡。当提高匹配精度的成本相对较低时,匹配承诺策略相比于传统的价格承诺更具有优势。本文还比较了不同策略下的消费者剩余和总社会福利。

关键词: 人工智能推荐, 承诺, 匹配精度, 延迟购买, 博弈

Abstract:

AI-based personalized recommendation services are now widely used by companies in various marketing areas. Companies analyze consumers’ purchasing behavior using AI and understand their preferences through user profiling. It allows them to recommend better-match products to consumers in future sales periods. AI can improve matching accuracy between recommended products and consumers, stimulate consumption thus expanding the market and promoting sales. However, it also may lead strategic consumers to expect better product recommendations in the future, wait and delay their purchases, thus resulting profit loss. As a result, companies need to be more cautious using AI-based recommendations. How companies should strategically use AI-based personalized recommendation services is explored through commitment strategies. A two-period dynamic game model is used to explore two commitment strategies:(1)Price commitment strategy, where the company announces the product prices of two periods in advance, similar to real-world price protection strategies;(2)Enhanced-match commitment strategy, where companies promote their AI recommendations to ensure that consumers have accurate expectations about the enhanced-match precision of future recommended products. Commitment strategies influence consumers' value assessments of products across two sales periods, thereby regulating purchasing behavior and creating strategic interactions for AI-based recommendations. The results indicate that AI-based personalized recommendation service is not necessarily beneficial. Only when the originally existence of purchase delay is not severe or the sales-promotion effect is strong enough, can the adoption of AI benefit the firms. Interestingly, although Enhanced-match strategy may seem to encourage delayed purchases, it actually reduces this effect and requires only a modest improvement in matching accuracy. Additionally, the relationship between the AI use extent and the costs of enhanced-match accuracy is not necessarily positive. Companies may need to heavily promote AI-based recommendations to enhance product matching accuracy, even with high costs, depending on the trade-off between sales promotion and delayed purchase effects. When the cost of enhanced-match accuracy is relatively low, the Enhanced-match strategy plays better than traditional price commitment strategies. The consumer surplus and total social welfare are also compared under different strategies.

Key words: AI recommendation, commitment, matching accuracy, delayed purchase, game

中图分类号: