心理阈值协同视角下群体评价数据客观优化方法及验证分析

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.1775

中国管理科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (7): 237-245.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.1775cstr: 32146.14.j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.1775

心理阈值协同视角下群体评价数据客观优化方法及验证分析

周莹¹, ², 易平涛¹, 王露¹, 董乾坤¹

1.东北大学工商管理学院，辽宁沈阳110819; 2.沈阳建筑大学管理学院，辽宁沈阳110168

收稿日期:2021-09-07 修回日期:2021-12-16 出版日期:2023-07-17 发布日期:2023-07-17
通讯作者: 周莹(1990-)，女(汉族)，辽宁鞍山人，沈阳建筑大学管理学院，副教授，东北大学工商管理学院，博士后，研究方向：复杂系统评价，Email: zhou6437719 @163. com. E-mail:zhou6437719@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(72001151)；辽宁省教育厅高等学校基本科研项目(LJKR0213)；2022年辽宁省哲学社会科学青年人才培养对象委托课题(20221s1qnrcwtkt-48)；辽宁省社会科学规划基金项目(L21CGL023)

Objective Optimization Method and Verification Analysis of Group Evaluation Data from the Perspective of Psychological Threshold Coordination

ZHOU Ying¹, ², YI Ping-tao¹, WANG Lu¹, DONG Qian-kun¹

1. School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China;2. School of Management, Shenyang Jianzhu University, Shenyang 110168, China

Received:2021-09-07 Revised:2021-12-16 Online:2023-07-17 Published:2023-07-17
Contact: 周莹 E-mail:zhou6437719@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 面向群体评价中存在的心理阈值差异问题，提出一种心理阈值协同视角下的主观评价数据客观优化方法。首先，对评价者全局与局部心理阈值进行介绍并构建心理阈值贴近协同模型，从稳定性优胜值、稳定性优胜度、趋近真值优胜值和趋近真值优胜度等方面给出模型的有效性测度方法。然后，运用随机模拟算法验证本文方法的有效性并为其选取更为适配的信息集结算子，进一步分析了不同境景下方法有效性的变化趋势。最后，通过应急管理水平群体评价算例对上述研究内容进行求解和可行性说明。本文方法可用于存在群体心理阈值差异的评价问题快速求解，在引导评价相关者制定更为科学的评价流程的同时可得到相对高质量的群体评价数据信息。

关键词: 综合评价；群体评价；心理阈值；随机模拟；数据优化

Abstract: In group evaluation, the subjective evaluation information provided by different evaluators usually has some objective and subjective differences. Psychological threshold refers to the critical range that can just cause psychological qualitative change. It is an important part of the subjective difference. Considering that sometimes the subjective psychological threshold data is difficult to obtain and quantify, it is necessary to carry out more in-depth research on the objective psychological threshold coordination method which can reduce the impact of psychological threshold difference on the authenticity of evaluation data.

Key words: comprehensive evaluation; group evaluation; psychological threshold; stochastic simulation; data optimization

中图分类号:

C934

周莹,易平涛,王露, 等. 心理阈值协同视角下群体评价数据客观优化方法及验证分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(7): 237-245.

ZHOU Ying,YI Ping-tao,WANG Lu, et al. Objective Optimization Method and Verification Analysis of Group Evaluation Data from the Perspective of Psychological Threshold Coordination[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(7): 237-245.

参考文献

［1］苏为华. 多指标综合评价理论与方法问题研究［D］. 厦门: 厦门大学, 2000.Su Weihua. Research on theory and method of multi criterion comprehensive evaluation［D］. Xiamen: Xiamen University, 2000.
［2］王宗军. 综合评价的方法、问题及其研究趋势［J］. 管理科学学报, 1998(1): 75-81.Wang Zongjun. On the methods, problems and research trends of comprehensive evaluation［J］. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 1998(1): 75-81.
［3］陈衍泰, 陈国宏, 李美娟. 综合评价方法分类及研究进展［J］. 管理科学学报, 2004, 7(2): 69-79.Chen Yantai, Chen Guohong, Li Meijuan. Classification & research advancement of comprehensive evaluation methods［J］. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2004, 7(2): 69-79.
［4］宫诚举, 李伟伟, 郭亚军. 群体评价中的序关系分析法［J］. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(11): 152-156.Gong Chengju, Li Weiwei, Guo Yajun. Rank correlation analysis method in group evaluation［J］. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(11): 152-156.
［5］张发明. 区间标度群组序关系评价法及其运用［J］. 系统工程理论与实践, 2013, 33(3): 720-725.Zhang Faming. Interval scales rank correlation analysis group evaluation method and its application［J］. Systems Engineering Theory & Practice, 2013, 33(3): 720-725.
［6］董庆兴, 郭亚军, 单翔. 基于双重差异驱动的群体评价方法［J］. 系统管理学报, 2014, 23(3): 451-454.Dong Qingxing, Guo Yajun, Shan Xiang. Group comprehensive evaluation method based on dual differentiation［J］. Journal of Systems & Management, 2014, 23(3): 451-454.
［7］ Ren Peijia, Xu Zeshui, Wang Xinin, et al. Group decision making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations based on modified extent measurement［J］. Expert Systems with Applications, 2021, 171: 114235.
［8］ Tang Ming, Liao Huchang, Mi Xiaomei, et al. A hierarchical consensus reaching process for group decision making with noncooperative behaviors［J］. European Journal of Operational Research, 2020, 293(2): 632-642.
［9］ Rodriguez R M, Labella A, Dutta B, et al. Comprehensive minimum cost models for large scale group decision making with consistent fuzzy preference relations［J］. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2021, 215: 106780.
［10］ Zhong Xiangyu, Xu Xuanhua, Chen Xiaohong, et al. Large group decision-making incorporating decision risk and risk attitude: a statistical approach［J］. Information Sciences, 2020, 533: 120-137.
［11］ Liao Huchang, Jiang Lisheng, Fang Ran, et al. A consensus measure for group decision making with hesitant linguistic preference information based on double alpha-cut［J］. Applied Soft Computing, 2021, 98: 106890.
［12］周金明, 苏为华, 周蕾, 等. 基于距离测度的直觉模糊群组评价共识达成方法［J］. 数学的实践与认识, 2018, 48(19): 184-193.Zhou Jinming, Su Weihua, Zhou Lei, et al. Research on consensus with intuitionistic fuzzy group assessment via distance measure［J］. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2018, 48(19): 184-193.
［13］侯芳, 刁鹏. 具有预置群体激励特征的群组评价方法［J］. 系统工程理论与实践, 2019, 39(8): 2116-2125.Hou Fang, Diao Peng. Group evaluation method considering predefined groups of incentive characteristics［J］. Systems Engineering Theory & Practice, 2019, 39(8): 2116-2125.
［14］王伟明, 徐海燕, 朱建军. 基于复杂网络和语言信息的交互式大规模群体评价方法［J］. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(11):260-271.Wang Weiming, Xu Haiyan, Zhu Jianjun. Interactive large-scale group evaluation method based on complex network and linguistic information［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(11):260-271.
［15］张发明, 王伟明. 不确定语言信息下的大规模交互式群体评价方法及其应用［J］. 系统管理学报, 2018, 27(6): 1081-1092.Zhang Faming, Wang Weiming. Large-scale interactive group evaluation method based on uncertain linguistic information and its application［J］. Journal of Systems & Management, 2018, 27(6): 1081-1092.
［16］陈骥, 苏为华, 张崇辉. 基于属性分布信息的大规模群体评价方法及应用［J］. 中国管理科学, 2013, 21(3): 146-152.Chen Ji, Su Weihua, Zhang Chonghui. The method of scale-group evaluation based on distribution information of attribute-avalue and its application［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2013, 21(3): 146-152.
［17］邹树梁, 武良鹏. 基于心理阈值与心理期望的多属性决策方法研究［J］. 模糊系统与数学, 2016, 30(3): 97-104.Zou Shuliang, Wu Liangpeng. Method for multiple attribute decision-making based on psychological threshold and expectiation［J］. Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics, 2016, 30(3): 97-104.
［18］ Kamo T, Nagahisa R. Arrovian social choice with psychological thresholds［J］. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 2016, 63: 93-99.
［19］郭亚军, 周莹, 易平涛, 等. 基于全局信息的动态激励评价方法及激励策略［J］. 系统工程学报, 2017, 32(2): 282-288.Guo Yajun, Zhou Ying, Yi Pingtao, et al. Dynamic incentive evaluation based on overall information and incentive strategy［J］. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2017, 32(2): 282-288.
［20］ Zhou Ying, Li Weiwei, Yi Pingtao, et al. Behavioral ordered weighted averaging operator and the application in multiattribute decision making［J］. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2019, 34(3): 386-399.
［21］ Xu Xuanhua, Du Zhijiao, Chen Xiaohong. Consensus model for multi-criteria large-group emergency decision making considering non-cooperative behaviors and minority opinions［J］. Decision Support Systems, 2015, 79: 150-160.
［22］周莹, 易平涛, 郭亚军. 心理阈值协同视角下的群体评价方法及应用［J］. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(4): 158-163.Zhou Ying, Yi Pingtao, Guo Yajun. Group evaluation method and its application from the psychological threshold cooperation perspective［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017, 25(4): 158-163.
［23］万本庭, 路如意, 赖志卿. 区间值毕达哥拉斯模糊幂加权平均算子及群决策方法［J］. 计算机应用研究, 2020, 37(S2): 184-187.Wang Benting, Lu Ruyi, Lai Zhiqing. Interval valued Pythagorean fuzzy weighted average operator and its group decision making method［J］. Application Research of Computers, 2020, 37(S2): 184-187.

[1]	张发明, 林璐萍, 叶兆青. 群体智慧下考虑模块化不信任关系的多属性大群体决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(6): 215-227.
[2]	朱莉, 杨潇, 曹杰. 政府补贴下考虑不同风险偏好的政企联合应急储备决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(6): 91-102.
[3]	邓旭东, 黎婷, 马云峰, 杨习杰. 基于不确定需求的货位分配策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(5): 166-174.
[4]	李鹏, 王可, 徐志伟. 基于偏好—赞成结构与前景理论的双边匹配决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(3): 181-191.
[5]	陈雪龙, 王子睿, 李苗苗. 多周期应急资源调配主体冲突消解方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(3): 226-241.
[6]	赵川, 郭子扬, 王焜, 董康银. 社交电商中考虑有价市场信息的拼团规模与区别定价决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(3): 242-252.
[7]	吴阳, 郭海湘, 石咏, 张文凯, 王雷. 预算约束下传染病疫苗接种补贴差异化分配与补贴效果[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(3): 80-92.
[8]	景熠, 刘芹芹, 周林. 突发事件影响下考虑供应中断风险和消费者偏好的制造商采购策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(3): 93-103.
[9]	谭笑, 蔡嘉麒, 巩在武. “结构-信息”耦合网络下基于强化学习的群智共识决策建模研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(3): 357-368.
[10]	朱立龙, 徐艳萍. 区块链技术下医药企业质量管理决策Moran分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(2): 185-194.
[11]	袁红平, 张莉, 曹兵兵. 区块链技术赋能的馈赠型产品供应链隐私保护与信誉维护决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(2): 336-347.
[12]	郑强, 梁德翠, 付园园, 徐泽水. 基于三支冲突感知分析的群决策共识模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(1): 85-93.
[13]	王人龙, 申芮, 池宏, 邵雪焱, 高敏刚. 考虑帕累托最优识别的偏序优先多属性决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(12): 121-133.
[14]	郭东威, 朱英明, 陈玉磊, 张耀. 基于交叉熵赋权的大规模创新型竞赛评审的优化模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(12): 134-145.
[15]	吴健, 王增文, 张文雅. 基于概率犹豫模糊双边匹配的退役士兵自主就业引导策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(11): 288-298.

心理阈值协同视角下群体评价数据客观优化方法及验证分析

Objective Optimization Method and Verification Analysis of Group Evaluation Data from the Perspective of Psychological Threshold Coordination

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0