中国管理科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (11): 203-214.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.0907cstr: 32146.14.j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.0907
姚升保, 古淼
收稿日期:2020-05-19
修回日期:2020-10-23
出版日期:2021-11-20
发布日期:2021-11-22
通讯作者:
姚升保(1977-),男(汉族),湖北黄冈人,中南财经政法大学工商管理学院,副教授,博士,研究方向:决策分析,Email: ysb@zuel.edu.cn.
E-mail:ysb@zuel.edu.cn
基金资助:YAO Sheng-bao, GU Miao
Received:2020-05-19
Revised:2020-10-23
Online:2021-11-20
Published:2021-11-22
Contact:
姚升保
E-mail:ysb@zuel.edu.cn
摘要: 群体成员之间的社会关系及其网络结构特征是影响群决策的重要因素。移情关系是客观存在于一些现实群决策问题中的一种社会关系,但目前考虑移情关系的群决策研究尚不多见。为拓展群决策模型的应用范围,面向移情网络环境提出一种群体共识决策方法,并揭示移情关系对群体共识决策的影响规律。首先,从偏好交互影响的角度出发,构建局部移情模型和全局移情模型,并由此确定移情关系影响下决策者偏好演化的结果。其次,利用个体偏好分解为内在偏好和移情偏好的结构特点,为群体共识达成过程设计一种有效的移情关系引导的反馈机制,该机制可以通过内在偏好层面的偏好调整实现个体偏好层面的共识收敛。最后,数值仿真分析表明:群体成员之间的移情关系提升了群体共识水平,而且全局移情关系比局部移情关系更有利于群体共识的达成;移情网络结构和群体规模是影响移情网络环境下群体共识达成的重要因素。相关决策模型和研究结论可为移情网络环境下的群体共识决策提供理论和方法支持。
中图分类号:
姚升保,古淼. 移情关系影响下的群体共识决策模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(11): 203-214.
YAO Sheng-bao,GU Miao. A Consensus Model for Group Decision Making under the Influence of Empathy[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(11): 203-214.
| [1] Hwang C, Lin M. Group decision making under multiple criteria: Methods and application[M]. Bermin: Springer, 1987. [2] Recio-García J, Quijano L, Díaz-Agudo B. Including social factors in an argumentative model for group decision support systems[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2013, 56: 48-55. [3] Pérez L, Mata F, Chiclana F, Kou G, Herrera-Viedma E. Modelling influence in group decision making[J]. Soft Computing, 2016, 20: 1653-1665. [4] Kamis N, Chiclana F, Levesley J. Preference similarity network structural equivalence clustering-based consensus group decision making model[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2018, 67: 706-720. [5] 石瑞丽, 郭春香, 顾新, 等. 社会网络视角下允许弃权的群决策权力分布研究.控制与决策, 2020, 35(11): 2599-2608.Shi Ruili, Guo Chunxiang, Gu Xin, et al. Power analysis of voting games with abstention based on social networks[J]. Control and Decision, 2020, 35(11): 2599-2608. [6] Gong Zaiwu, Wang Hui, Guo Weiwei, et al. Measuring trust in social networks based on linear uncertainty theory[J]. Information Sciences, 2020, 508: 154-172. [7] Victor P, Cornelis C, Cock M, et al. Practical aggregation operators for gradual trust and distrust[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2011, 184: 126-147. [8] Wu Jian, Xiong Ruoyun, Chiclana F. Uninorm trust propagation and aggregation methods for group decision making in social network with four tuple information[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2016, 96: 29-39. [9] Urea R, Kou Gang, Dong Yucheng, et al. A review on trust propagation and opinion dynamics in social networks and group decision making frameworks[J]. Information Sciences, 2019, 478: 461-475. [10] Liang Qian, Liao Xiuwu, Liu Jiapeng. A social ties-based approach for group decision-making problems with incomplete additive preference relations[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2017, 119: 68-86. [11] Capuano N, Chiclana F, Fujita H, et al. Fuzzy group decision making with incomplete information guided by social influence[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2018, 26(3): 1704-1718. [12] Alonso S, Perez I, Cabrerizo F. A linguistic consensus model for Web 2.0 communities[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2013, 13(1): 149-157. [13] Wu Jian, Chiclana F. A social network analysis trust-consensus based approach to group decision-making problems with interval-valued fuzzy reciprocal preference relations[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2014, 59: 97-107. [14] Urea R, Chiclana F, Melanon G, et al. A social network-based approach for consensus achievement in multiperson decision making[J]. Information Fusion, 2019, 47: 72-87. [15] Gupta M. Consensus building process in group decision making-an adaptive procedure based on group dynamics[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2018, 26(4): 1923-1933. [16] Liu Xia, Xu Yejun, Montes R, et al. Social network group decision making: Managing self-confidence-based consensus model with the dynamic importance degree of experts and trust-based feedback mechanism[J]. Information Sciences, 2019, 505: 215-232. [17] Dong Yucheng, Ding Zhaogang, Martinez L, et al. Managing consensus based on leadership in opinion dynamics[J]. Information Sciences, 2017, 397-398: 187-205. [18] Morente-Molinera J, Kou Gang, Peng Yi, et al, Herrera-Viedma E. Analysing discussions in social networks using group decision making methods and sentiment analysis[J]. Information Sciences, 2018, 447: 157-168. [19] Xu Xuanhua, Wang Bing, Zhou Yanju. A method based on trust model for large group decision-making with incomplete preference information[J]. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2016, 30: 3551-3565. [20] Wu Tong, Liu Xinwang, Liu Fang. An interval type-2 fuzzy TOPSIS model for large scale group decision making problems with social network information[J]. Information Sciences, 2018, 432: 392-410. [21] Liu Bingsheng, Zhou Qi, Ding Ruxi, et al. Large-scale group decision making model based on social network analysis: trust relationship-based conflict detection and elimination[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 275(2): 737-754. [22] 李磊, 张曙阳.共识条件下最小最大妥协的直觉模糊数集结方法研究[J].中国管理科学, 2021, 29(2): 168-176.Li Lei, Zhang Shuyang. Aggregation method of intuitionistic fuzzy numbers with minimized maximal compromise under consensus condition[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(2): 168-176. [23] 刘金培, 杨宏伟, 陈华友, 等. 基于交叉效率DEA与群体共识的区间乘性语言偏好关系群决策[J]. 中国管理科学,2020, 28(2): 190-198.Liu Jinpei, Yang Hongwei, Chen Huayou, et al. Group decision making with interval multiplicative linguistic preference relations based on cross-efficiency DEA and group consensus[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(2): 190-198. [24] Singer T. The neuronal basis and ontogeny of empathy and mind reading: review of literature and implications for future research[J]. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 2016, 30: 855-863. [25] 陈银飞, 茅宁. 涉他偏好理论研究评述[J]. 经济问题, 2008, 11: 2-7.Chen Yinfei, Mao Ning. Comments on theories of other-regarding preferences[J]. Economic Problems, 2008, 11:2-7. [26] Salehi-Abari A, Boutilier C, Larson K. Empathetic decision making in social networks[J]. Artificial Intelligence, 2019, 275, 174-203. [27] 徐泽水. 直觉模糊偏好信息下的多属性决策途径[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2007,27(11): 62-71.Xu Zeshui. Approaches to Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Preference Information[J]. System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2007,27(11): 62-71. [28] Atanassov K T. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Fuzzy Sets & Systems, 1986, 20(1): 87-96. [29] 燕蜻, 梁吉业. 混合多属性群决策中的群体一致性分析方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011,19(6): 133-140.Yan Qin, Liang Jiye. A method for consensus analysis in hybrid multiple attribute group decision making[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2011,19(6): 133-140. [30] Yager R. Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 1996, 11: 49-73. [31] 吴志彬. 群体共识决策理论与方法[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2017.Wu Zhibin. Consensus theory and methods for group decision making[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2017. [32] Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma, et al. A classification method of alternatives for multiple preference ordering criteria based on fuzzy majority[J]. Journal of Fuzzy Mathematics, 1996, 4: 801-814. |
| [1] | 聂慧芳, 朱建军. 考虑情绪演化下突发事件所致舆情危机的两阶段响应决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 112-125. |
| [2] | 张恒杰, 刘娟, 朱文凤, 董玉成. 基于最小成本反向图模型的双渠道供应链碳减排冲突研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 212-224. |
| [3] | 景熠, 刘威, 刘芹芹, 程凤娇, 张华荣. 突发事件冲击下应对供应中断的供应链响应计划研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 57-66. |
| [4] | 张发明, 韩江涛, 张淋茜, 朱姝琪. 社会信任网络下基于T2PLD算子的多属性大群体决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(9): 177-188. |
| [5] | 李聪聪, 梁海明, 董玉成. 多粒度语言环境下基于持续学习和行为建模的个性化语义共识决策模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(9): 201-212. |
| [6] | 景熠, 张闻秋, 曹柳. 电商购物平台与回收平台的“以旧换新”合作策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(8): 289-297. |
| [7] | 代业明, 于双. 碳税政策下考虑零售商双重行为偏好的再制造闭环供应链决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(8): 308-320. |
| [8] | 张侃, 刘思施, 魏华, 余鹏, 梁新. 基于CPSO改进的TOPSIS三维空间组合定权投影动态综合评价研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 117-127. |
| [9] | 董乾坤, 易平涛, 李伟伟, 王露. 基于多源混合评价信息的随机聚合指数及应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 128-138. |
| [10] | 李进, 江赫奇, 丁圣琪, 张海霞, 伍蓓. 碳交易机制下竞争型供应链最优减排与规制政策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 360-368. |
| [11] | 缑迅杰, 徐鑫茹, 徐泽水. 基于动态社会网络的能源转型路径评估多属性群决策建模研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(6): 346-359. |
| [12] | 罗世华, 刘俊. 拓展区间Fermatean模糊前景理论综合评价方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(6): 129-139. |
| [13] | 张磊, 韩可可, 叶鑫. 广义Z-numbers证据下考虑专家影响力和评价值一致性的应急决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(6): 160-170. |
| [14] | 常志朋, 王治莹, 陈闻鹤. 基于模糊影响图和前景理论的重大疫情防控策略决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(6): 171-181. |
| [15] | 赵程伟, 徐选华, 刘瑞环, 何继善. 模糊异构环境下考虑双重交互及不完全理性心理的多属性群决策及应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(6): 182-195. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
|
||