主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (9): 326-336.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2023.1490

• • 上一篇    下一篇

不同权力结构下渠道选择与供应链透明度的互动关系研究

刘兴芬1,2, 周忠宝3(), 钟斐敏3   

  1. 1.贵州大学管理学院,贵州 贵阳 550025
    2.贵州大学数字化转型与治理协同创新实验室,贵州 贵阳 550025
    3.湖南大学工商管理学院,湖南 长沙 410082
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-07 修回日期:2024-10-05 出版日期:2026-09-25 发布日期:2026-09-01
  • 通讯作者: 周忠宝 E-mail:z.b.zhou@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重点项目(23AJY005);湖南省自然科学基金重点项目(2024JJ3015);数字化转型与治理协同创新实验室专项课题(GLSZ202412);贵州大学2025年度人文社会科学重点项目(GDZD2025006)

Interaction between Channel Selection and Supply Chain Transparency under Varying Power Structures

Xingfen Liu1,2, Zhongbao Zhou3(), Feimin Zhong3   

  1. 1.School of Management,Guizhou University,Guiyang 550025,China
    2.Collaborative Innovation Laboratory for Digital Transformation and Governance,Guizhou University,Guiyang 550025,China
    3.School of Business Administration,Hunan University,Changsha 410082,China
  • Received:2023-09-07 Revised:2024-10-05 Online:2026-09-25 Published:2026-09-01
  • Contact: Zhongbao Zhou E-mail:z.b.zhou@163.com

摘要:

近年来频发的产品安全事件显著削弱了消费者对产品质量的信任,其态度也由默认安全转向普遍质疑。在此背景下,企业日益重视信息披露,提高供应链透明度成为重要的战略选择。然而,信息披露不仅存在成本,其披露程度也并非越高越好,效果可能受到供应链权力结构、渠道策略与技术手段的交互影响,这些机制尚缺乏系统研究。基于此,本文构建包含制造商与零售商的两级供应链模型,制造商可选择是否开通直销渠道。在不同权力结构下,分析其渠道选择与透明度提升之间的互动关系,并进一步引入区块链技术以增强信息披露的可靠性,探讨其对供应链成员行为与利润分配的影响。研究表明,制造商的供应链透明度决策不受权力结构影响,其批发价决策则随其权力增强而上升;相比之下,零售商的最优定价策略高度依赖其权力强弱:权力较弱时倾向低价以维持竞争力,权力较强时则倾向高价以获取更高利润。提高供应链透明度有助于制造商开通直销渠道,但该作用在不同权力结构下表现出不同特征。随着制造商权力的增强 (零售商领导→权力相等→制造商领导),其开通直销渠道的意愿及透明度对渠道决策的影响先减弱后增强。在直销成本较高的情形下,制造商更倾向维持单一渠道结构,零售商可稳定获益,而制造商仅在溯源成本较低时才能获利。反之,若直销成本较低,制造商则倾向开通直销渠道,并能独占透明度提升所带来的收益,零售商此时则无法获利。因此,尽管当消费者对网络的接受度较低时,双渠道下的最优透明度较低,但制造商在双渠道下从提升供应链透明度中获利的概率总是更大。进一步研究还发现,零售商对区块链技术的采纳偏好取决于制造商的渠道选择,而制造商的采纳偏好则主要由区块链在提升信息披露可靠性方面的效率所决定。

关键词: 区块链技术, 供应链透明度, 双渠道, 权力结构, 产品溯源

Abstract:

In recent years, frequent product safety incidents have significantly undermined consumers’ trust in product quality, shifting their attitudes from assuming safety by default to adopting a more skeptical stance. Against this backdrop, firms have increasingly attached importance to information disclosure, making the improvement of supply chain transparency a key strategic choice. However, information disclosure not only incurs costs, but its optimal level is not necessarily the highest possible. Its effectiveness may be jointly influenced by the interaction among supply chain power structure, channel strategy, and technological means. Yet, these mechanisms have not been systematically studied. To fill this gap, a two-echelon supply chain model consisting of a manufacturer and a retailer is developed, in which the manufacturer can decide whether to open a direct-sales channel. Under different power structures, the interaction between channel choice and transparency improvement is analyzed, and further blockchain technology is incorporated to enhance the reliability of information disclosure, exploring its impact on the behavior of supply chain members and profit distribution. The results show that the manufacturer’s decision on supply chain transparency is not affected by the power structure, while its wholesale pricing decision increases as its bargaining power rises. In contrast, the retailer’s optimal pricing strategy is highly dependent on its relative power: when weaker, it tends to set lower prices to maintain competitiveness; when stronger, it prefers higher prices to obtain greater profits. Improving supply chain transparency facilitates the manufacturer’s adoption of a direct-sales channel, but this effect exhibits different characteristics under different power structures. As the manufacturer’s power increases (from Retailer-led to equal power to Manufacturer-led), both its willingness to open a direct-sales channel and the impact of transparency on channel choice first weaken and then strengthen. When direct-sales costs are high, the manufacturer prefers to maintain a single-channel structure, allowing the retailer to earn stable profits, while the manufacturer can profit only if traceability costs are low. Conversely, when direct-sales costs are low, the manufacturer is inclined to open a direct-sales channel and exclusively capture the benefits brought by improved transparency, leaving the retailer unable to profit. Therefore, although the optimal transparency level under a dual-channel structure may be lower when consumers’ online acceptance is low, the manufacturer is always more likely to profit from enhancing supply chain transparency in a dual-channel setting. Further analysis reveals that the retailer’s adoption preference for blockchain technology depends on the manufacturer’s channel choice, whereas the manufacturer’s adoption preference is mainly determined by blockchain’s efficiency in improving the reliability of information disclosure.

Key words: blockchain technology, supply chain transparency, dual-channel, power structure, product traceability

中图分类号: